Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while JFrog is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 16.4% mindshare in CR, compared to JFrog’s 30.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 15 Amazon ECR reviews

4,465 Views
3,933 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog Container Registry

Read 3 JFrog Container Registry reviews

5,995 Views
5,694 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

JFrog Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry compete in the container registry solutions category. JFrog seems to have an edge due to its advanced features and user satisfaction, despite Amazon ECR's favorable pricing and integration.

Features: Amazon ECR features seamless integration with AWS, scalable architecture, and excellent security. JFrog Container Registry offers robust support for multiple artifact types, superior multi-cloud performance, and an extensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Amazon ECR could improve cross-region replication, support for non-AWS platforms, and user interface intuitiveness. JFrog Container Registry can focus on enhancing its management tools, simplifying user interface navigation, and addressing some efficiency issues based on user feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon ECR's deployment model is integrated within AWS and offers reliable customer support. JFrog Container Registry provides flexible deployment options across environments but may face more challenges in customer support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR is competitively priced, seen as cost-effective for AWS users, providing clear ROI. JFrog Container Registry is more expensive but is considered worth the investment for its features and cross-platform utility, reflecting a higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

2nd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 16.4%, down from 19.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Container Registry is 30.1%, up from 22.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Helps to store Docker containers and images but deployment can be complex

If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option. Setting up this product initially does take quite a bit of time, and maintaining it also requires effort. Doing it via command line would be challenging, so I find it easier to manage through the interface.

Read full review

Sai Balaji Bonagiri

DevOps Engineer at Infosys

Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns

In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started. However, once you gain some experience, working with JFrog becomes much easier. Overall, it's manageable for beginners, but there might be a bit of a learning curve. I'd call myself an intermediate user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."

"The most valuable feature is that Amazon ECR is very simple and useful."

"The integration with AWS services is very easy, and the deployment and initial setup are pretty straightforward."

"The solution is very stable."

"The most valuable aspect of ECR is its user-friendliness."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."

"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."

More Amazon ECR pros

"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."

"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."

Cons

"Amazon ECR should include integration with Docker Hub."

"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."

"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."

"Deeper integration with other security tools would enhance usability."

"The Amazon ECR interface could benefit from improvements to enhance user experience."

"If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option."

"Amazon ECR's manipulation capability of tags needs to be improved."

"There is no room for improvement mentioned; it's good as is."

More Amazon ECR cons

"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."

"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."

"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."

"JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

The pricing of ECR is average compared to its competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

There is no room for improvement mentioned; it's good as is.

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Container Registry?

It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Container Registry?

JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution’s pricing a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Container Registry?

The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly. The documentation is mostly for the on-prem services, and there's no documentation for the clo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 31% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 13% of the time

Google Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon ECR

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 56% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

More JFrog Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

November 2024

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

November 2024

Download JFrog Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

JFrog

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

October 2024

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.