Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Registry category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while JFrog is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 16.9% mindshare in CR, compared to JFrog’s 30.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Amazon ECR

Read 20 Amazon ECR reviews

4,198 Views
3,569 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JFrog Container Registry

Read 3 JFrog Container Registry reviews

6,254 Views
5,929 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Amazon ECR

JFrog Container Registry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Amazon ECR and JFrog Container Registry are competing in the realm of container management and storage in cloud environments. Amazon ECR is advantageous for its seamless AWS integration and pricing, while JFrog Container Registry provides a broader feature set suitable for multiple environments.

Features: Amazon ECR is noted for its tight integration with AWS services, scalability, and pricing model. JFrog Container Registry supports multiple environments, offers compatibility with various programming languages, and possesses a robust feature set suitable for hybrid and multi-cloud scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon ECR offers a seamless deployment within the AWS suite, facilitating an easy experience for AWS users. Its customer service is responsive and efficient. JFrog Container Registry provides customizable deployment options for on-premise and hybrid clouds, paired with customer service known for technical expertise and support in complex cases.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon ECR uses a straightforward pay-as-you-go pricing model that effectively aligns with AWS service usage, minimizing upfront costs. While JFrog Container Registry may require a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive features, it potentially offers better ROI with its flexibility and support for diverse environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon ECR

Ranking in Container Registry

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Container Registry

Ranking in Container Registry

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Amazon ECR is 16.9%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Container Registry is 30.9%, up from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

Rikin Parekh

Backend Engineer at Northeastern University

Helps to store Docker containers and images but deployment can be complex

If there were a way to use containers as tasks directly, that would simplify things. Currently, when we use EC2 instances, scaling horizontally means increasing the instance count by five times, which might not be cost-effective. Maybe using containers directly for tasks could be a better option. Setting up this product initially does take quite a bit of time, and maintaining it also requires effort. Doing it via command line would be challenging, so I find it easier to manage through the interface.

Read full review

Sai Balaji Bonagiri

DevOps Engineer at Infosys

Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns

In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started. However, once you gain some experience, working with JFrog becomes much easier. Overall, it's manageable for beginners, but there might be a bit of a learning curve. I'd call myself an intermediate user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"The main feature I value is the ability to deposit and retrieve images."

"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."

"The most valuable feature is that Amazon ECR is very simple and useful."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning of images for vulnerabilities."

"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."

"The integration with AWS services is very easy, and the deployment and initial setup are pretty straightforward."

More Amazon ECR pros

"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."

"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."

Cons

"Deeper integration with other security tools would enhance usability."

"There is no room for improvement mentioned; it's good as is."

"I suggest making it more aligned with the Docker registry version two API specification."

"Amazon ECR should include integration with Docker Hub."

"The documentation could be improved."

"There were a few issues related to the roles, policies, and retrieval of data when trying to fetch images for deployment on Amazon ECS. This can involve permissions and configuration complexities."

"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."

"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."

More Amazon ECR cons

"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."

"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."

"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon ECR does not have a high cost."

"The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective."

"The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US."

"The solution's price is reasonable compared to its competitors"

"My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."

"JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon ECR?

One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utili...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon ECR?

In the ECR setup, we use a container registry per region. All accounts are within a shared account, which we call a shared account. We share the container registry across various accounts within ou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon ECR?

I suggest making it more aligned with the Docker registry version two API specification. If they achieve this, it would be excellent. Eli is an example of such an implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Container Registry?

It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Container Registry?

JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution’s pricing a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Container Registry?

The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly. The documentation is mostly for the on-prem services, and there's no documentation for the clo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 30% of the time

Harbor vs Amazon ECR

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

DigitalOcean Container Registry vs Amazon ECR

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs Amazon ECR

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon ECR Competitors

Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 54% of the time

Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry

Compared 2% of the time

More JFrog Container Registry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

March 2025

Download Amazon ECR product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Registry

March 2025

Download JFrog Container Registry product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Container Registry

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) is a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. Amazon ECR is integrated with Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS), simplifying your development to production workflow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

March 2025

Free Report: Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon ECR vs. JFrog Container Registry report.

See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.