HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition comparison

HCLSoftware and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. HCLSoftware is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9, while PortSwigger is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Additionally, 83% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

621 Views
492 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Read 12 PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition reviews

196 Views
123 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024

HCL AppScan and PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are top contenders in the application security testing market. Despite both offering comprehensive security features, user reviews favor Burp Suite for effectiveness and satisfaction, while HCL AppScan is noted for ease of use and deployment.

Features: HCL AppScan offers automated scanning capabilities, extensive reporting features, and integration with various development tools. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition includes advanced vulnerability detection, customizable scanning options, and thorough scanning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users seek improved scan speeds, better false-positive management, and enhanced performance. PortSwigger Burp Suite needs easier user training, a better knowledge base, and improved user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer support. PortSwigger Burp Suite has a more complex deployment but offers extensive documentation and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan has high setup costs but provides value over time with robust features. PortSwigger Burp Suite also has higher initial costs but its feature set correlates with high ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (15th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (22nd)

Featured Reviews

AnshulTomar

Cyber Security Architect and Presales Consultant at Kyndryl

Scalable platform with efficient static and dynamic testing features

We use the product for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). By integrating AppScan into our CI/CD pipelines, aligned with Agile methodologies, we ensure that security testing becomes an integral part of the software development lifecycle The…

Read full review

Hasan Abufreiha

Cyber security enthusiast at a university with 51-200 employees

Used for web application auditing and security audits for web applications

I would advise users to limit Burp Suite usage to specific scenarios and applications. Users should use the solution as an expert testing tool instead of using it as a general scanner or for information gathering in general. The tool might be overwhelming initially for new users, but it will be easy after you get used to the UI, features, and options. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition has been doing an amazing job for years compared to other similar tools. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The HCL AppScan turnaround time for Burp Suite or any new feature request is pretty good, and that is why we are sticking with the HCL."

"The security and the dashboard are the most valuable features."

"IBM AppScan has made our work easy, as we can do four to five scans of websites at a time, which saves time when it comes to vulnerability."

"It provides a better integration for our ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman."

"AppScan is stable."

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"Technical support is helpful."

More HCL AppScan pros

"The most valuable part of it was probably the ability to intercept and modify calls."

"This tool helps identify vulnerabilities. We then provide the report to the developers, who address the issues identified automatically. Its most valuable feature is CI/CD integration."

"The product is easy to use."

"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."

"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."

"The tool is loaded with many features that give us ROI."

"Its automated scanning feature saves time."

"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition pros

Cons

"If HCL AppScan is able to alert the clients over email once the scan is complete, it would be great. Right now, HCL AppScan doesn't let me know if the scanning part is finished or not, because of which I have to come back and check mostly."

"There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. "

"They have to improve support."

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"The product has some technical limitations."

"We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future."

"I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers."

"The tool should improve its output. Scanning is not a challenge anymore since there are many such tools available in the market. The product needs to focus on how its output is being used by end users. It should be also more user-friendly. One of the major challenges is in the tool's integration with applications that need to be scanned. Sometimes, the scanning is not proper."

More HCL AppScan cons

"It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively."

"From my personal experience, the solution's performance could be improved."

"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition should incorporate a static code analysis feature. One main issue we encounter is false positives. False positives can be challenging for developers."

"It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"The product needs to have the ability to evaluate more."

"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"The price is very expensive."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is reasonable and costs around 400 dollars per year."

"Although the solution can be a bit expensive for small companies, its pricing is fairly reasonable for its capabilities."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is neither a cheap nor an expensive product. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is a good tool for companies."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is expensive compared to other solutions."

"For Professional, it's about $400 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

I am using the Community Edition, which is free, however, I understand there might be extra expenses for additional features or services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 34% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 3% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

January 2025

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

January 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

No data available

Learn More

HCLSoftware

PortSwigger

Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is an automated web vulnerability scanner, designed to enable enterprises to scale security across their web portfolios and achieve DevSecOps. Automate trusted Burp scans, integrate web security testing with development, and free your application security to support software development.

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Nasa, Disney, Dow Jones, Iberia Bank, IBM, Ernest and Young, Apple, Ryanair, Thyssenkrupp, Delivery Hero

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

December 2024

Free Report: HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.