HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition comparison

HCLSoftware and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. HCLSoftware is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9, while PortSwigger is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. HCLSoftware holds a 16.3% mindshare in DAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 13.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 43 HCL AppScan reviews

571 Views
433 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Read 12 PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition reviews

255 Views
154 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024

HCL AppScan and PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition are top contenders in the application security testing market. Despite both offering comprehensive security features, user reviews favor Burp Suite for effectiveness and satisfaction, while HCL AppScan is noted for ease of use and deployment.

Features: HCL AppScan offers automated scanning capabilities, extensive reporting features, and integration with various development tools. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition includes advanced vulnerability detection, customizable scanning options, and thorough scanning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan users seek improved scan speeds, better false-positive management, and enhanced performance. PortSwigger Burp Suite needs easier user training, a better knowledge base, and improved user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is known for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer support. PortSwigger Burp Suite has a more complex deployment but offers extensive documentation and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan has high setup costs but provides value over time with robust features. PortSwigger Burp Suite also has higher initial costs but its feature set correlates with high ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (14th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 16.3%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is 13.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Rishi Anupam

Senior Manager at Airtel

A stable and scalable scanning solution with good reporting feature

The solution is used for the vulnerabilities scan on the network side The reporting part is the most valuable feature. The penetration testing feature should be included. I have been using the solution for four years. It is a stable solution. I rate it seven out of ten. It is a scalable…

Read full review

Hasan Abufreiha

Cyber security enthusiast at a university with 51-200 employees

Used for web application auditing and security audits for web applications

I would advise users to limit Burp Suite usage to specific scenarios and applications. Users should use the solution as an expert testing tool instead of using it as a general scanner or for information gathering in general. The tool might be overwhelming initially for new users, but it will be easy after you get used to the UI, features, and options. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition has been doing an amazing job for years compared to other similar tools. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

"This is a stable solution."

"It highlights, with several grades of severity, the types of vulnerabilities, so we can focus on the most severe security vulnerabilities in the code."

"The security and the dashboard are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the scanning or security part."

"We use it as a security testing application."

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"The solution is cheap."

More HCL AppScan pros

"The product is easy to use."

"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."

"This tool helps identify vulnerabilities. We then provide the report to the developers, who address the issues identified automatically. Its most valuable feature is CI/CD integration."

"The most appreciated functionality of PortSwigger Burp Suite is its ability to perform brute force attacks automatically."

"I like normal dynamic scanning, general web applications scanning, and vulnerability assessments."

"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable part of it was probably the ability to intercept and modify calls."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition pros

Cons

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good."

"If HCL AppScan is able to alert the clients over email once the scan is complete, it would be great. Right now, HCL AppScan doesn't let me know if the scanning part is finished or not, because of which I have to come back and check mostly."

"Improvement can be done as per customer requirements."

"They should have a better UI for dashboards."

"In future releases, I would like to see more aggressive reports. I would also like to see less false positives."

"IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use."

"Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its features."

More HCL AppScan cons

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively."

"From my personal experience, the solution's performance could be improved."

"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."

"Scalability could be better."

"The stability of the scans could be improved."

"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition should incorporate a static code analysis feature. One main issue we encounter is false positives. False positives can be challenging for developers."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"The price is very expensive."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"The tool was expensive."

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is expensive compared to other solutions."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is neither a cheap nor an expensive product. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is a good tool for companies."

"For Professional, it's about $400 per year."

"Although the solution can be a bit expensive for small companies, its pricing is fairly reasonable for its capabilities."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable and costs around 400 dollars per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

AppScan needs to improve its handling of false positives. It also requires enhancements in customer support, similar to what Veracode provides. Regularly scheduling calls with clients to discuss fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

The primary use case for AppScan is for security purposes. I compare AppScan with other tools such as Veracode. We use AppScan for vulnerability detection and auto-remediation of vulnerabilities wi...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

I am using the Community Edition, which is free, however, I understand there might be extra expenses for additional features or services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 12% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 10% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

OWASP Zap vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 31% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 17% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 4% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

April 2025

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

April 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

No data available

Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

HCLSoftware

Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is an automated web vulnerability scanner, designed to enable enterprises to scale security across their web portfolios and achieve DevSecOps. Automate trusted Burp scans, integrate web security testing with development, and free your application security to support software development.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Nasa, Disney, Dow Jones, Iberia Bank, IBM, Ernest and Young, Apple, Ryanair, Thyssenkrupp, Delivery Hero

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

March 2025

Free Report: HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.