HeadSpin vs Testim comparison

HeadSpin and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. HeadSpin is ranked #30, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. HeadSpin holds a 0.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HeadSpin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

HeadSpin

Read 6 HeadSpin reviews

581 Views
316 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,629 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HeadSpin

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

HeadSpin and Testim are competitive products in the field of application testing and monitoring. HeadSpin appears to have the upper hand in scalability and comprehensive network support, whereas Testim leads in intelligent test automation.

Features: HeadSpin provides robust network performance monitoring, real-time data analysis, and cross-platform versatility. Testim offers AI-driven test creation, easy maintenance capabilities, and efficient automated testing strategies.

Room for Improvement: HeadSpin could enhance its initial setup process, offer more cost-effective pricing options, and improve integration capabilities with more third-party applications. Testim might benefit from expanding its network performance monitoring features, offering more comprehensive platform support, and enhancing real-time data analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HeadSpin supports flexible cloud-based deployments and offers extensive customer support options, appealing to larger enterprises. In contrast, Testim provides streamlined SaaS deployment with quick implementation, coupled with highly responsive support services.

Pricing and ROI: HeadSpin involves a substantial setup cost but promises ROI through network optimization and performance insights. Conversely, Testim offers a cost-effective solution aimed at companies seeking efficient automation without high initial investments, emphasizing immediate ROI through its test automation.

To learn more, read our detailed HeadSpin vs. Testim Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin vs. Testim

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HeadSpin

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

30th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (7th), Mobile App Testing Tools (11th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of HeadSpin is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Abhishek-Mehta

Associate Vice President at Onnivation

An advanced platform that provides visibility into the performance in the real world and enables us to test AV content

There is definitely room for improvement in terms of marketing. Marketing is something that is not that great. If you look at some of the other companies in the space, they have a lot of published case studies and tested models. They make a lot of noise. They have got some of their best customers talking about them, which is where HeadSpin needs to work. They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process. There is a great scope to improve professional services. The time to deploy is quite long. They can increase and improve the scope of their professional services and set up automation through scripts. They do it at this stage, but they're very expensive. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing for companies that are startups or low on funds. Apart from these, they have been on top of the game in terms of features. I can't think of any other new set of features at this point in time because they're already on top in terms of innovation.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of HeadSpin was very easy and user-friendly. It was easy to configure and write a script."

"The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform."

"The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to. We can use Zoom or Google Meet to interact with them directly, and if there is an issue in our system, they will help us by reproducing the issue in their machines and trying to figure out a solution. The support is really smooth, and we like that they're very supportive."

"The most valuable features of the product are the performance parameters it gives us."

"The most valuable feature of HeadSpin it's the integration with other solutions. It is great. I can search for an element or do a quick debugging on the application right on HeadSpin. It's very useful."

"It has an interesting feature called AV box testing. A lot of companies that are in the OTT segment don't really understand what their streaming is like. They can't test for streaming quality. There are restrictions where you cannot simulate live streaming. For example, on Netflix, you can't simulate how a movie is being streamed on a remote device. That's why HeadSpin has got this AV box testing feature. It is a patented feature. They send an AV box to your location, and you can test live streaming, which is something that no other company does."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The product is easy to use."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"It is a highly stable solution."

More Testim pros

Cons

"Support and pricing could be improved."

"If you want to do some testing or check the devices manually or check the application in a particular device manually, it is really laggy. That's a disappointment because sometimes we would like to do manual testing when our local devices are not available."

"HeadSpin needs to improve the hardware. With the mobile, the battery life reduces and must be continuously charged."

"HeadSpin could improve on the user interface because it is very poor. The checks that are done on the iOS devices are very difficult, but for Android, it runs great. For all iOS devices, the user interface and how it interacts with the device are very poor."

"Sometimes, devices go offline and some features are not functioning on some devices, specifically on iOS."

"They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a yearly license. There is no other option. It is expensive. There are a lot of other cheaper players in the market, but it is like a Mercedes. You pay an extra premium for it, but you get the benefits. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing. Companies that are low on funds or new-age can do with pricing that is easily digestible. They can give them a pricing model for three months. They can provide a startup package."

"We have a yearly license for 16 devices."

"I believe the licensing cost is cheap because it's a total solution, hardware, license and software."

"It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs HeadSpin

Compared 60% of the time

BrowserStack vs HeadSpin

Compared 40% of the time

More HeadSpin Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 51% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin

April 2025

Download HeadSpin product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

March 2025

Download Testim product report

Overview

Headspin is a data science-driven Mobile APM platform that leverages an AI platform to combine global device infrastructure, test automation, machine learning-driven performance, and quality of experience analytics. HeadSpin was founded to answer the demand for a global testing, performance monitoring, and quality of experience (QoE) management platform to assist businesses in ensuring optimal digital experiences across mobile, audio, online, and video delivery channels.

Headspin facilitates seamless collaboration between product managers, SREs, developers, QA/release engineers, and support staff to:

Quicken development times using intelligent automation in test and production.
Optimize digital performance across devices, networks, and apps.
Automate insights discovery with practical, context-aware AI and analytics.

Headspin Features

Headspin has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Global device infrastructure allows end-to-end monitoring and testing with thousands of devices in numerous locations on real carrier and WiFi networks around the world. SDK is not required.
Test automation and APIs integrate into CI/CD workflows to enable functional and performance testing pre and post release. Support for all testing frameworks.
Performance, QoE, and machine learning automatically expose issues and points to underlying root causes across all layers of the stack, from quantifying audio/video quality of experience to code and packet visibility.
Insights-to-actions delivers regression and aggregation insights throughout the digital experience lifecycle. These insights take you from planning and development to troubleticketing and operations. Trending, alerts, and analytics.

More features include:

Hosted Device Cloud
On-prem Device Appliance
Performance & Experience Analytics
Professional Services & Support
Education, Certification & Training

Headspin Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Headspin. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Use data science to identify problems and root cause analysis

Empower QA and DevOps teams with data science insights and test automation

Global teams can work together using remote access

Capture performance and UX issues

Reviews from Real Users

Headspin stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its easy setup, scalability, and robust customer support. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

Abhishek M., Associate Vice President at Onnivation, notes, “A lot of companies that are using other solutions do not get access to the kind of metrics that HeadSpin captures…HeadSpin is highly advanced. It has got all the performance structures to provide visibility into how my app is performing in the real world. It also helps to identify the gaps.”

Shiba S., Automation Engineer at GlobalLogic India, writes, “The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to…They support multiple devices. Plus, they support distribution testing.”

HeadSpin

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Sample Customers

Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, Telstra

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

HeadSpin vs. Testim

March 2025

Free Report: HeadSpin vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about HeadSpin vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HeadSpin vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.