Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Heap vs Mixpanel comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Heap
Ranking in Web Analytics
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mixpanel
Ranking in Web Analytics
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Web Analytics category, the mindshare of Heap is 6.6%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mixpanel is 6.9%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Janelle Block - PeerSpot reviewer
Monitors testing activities and perform roadmaps and ad-hoc requests
Heap is quite user-friendly, featuring a primarily no-code interface for primary stakeholders. Some technical skills are required for administrators. However, based on my experience, Heap's design effectively supports a self-service model, making it feasible for users to manage on their own Your data is only as good as how well you maintain it. If you want to keep a lean development team, you must invest in the right tools. In some business situations, where the team is small, and there is limited support for analytics, a highly effective tool is crucial. It is one of the fastest tools I've used for gaining insights without spending excessive time chasing data. I've resolved most issues on my own in a reasonable timeframe, improving the speed of servicing requests. Given its effectiveness, especially for teams with constraints, it's a worthwhile investment if you need a powerful tool that delivers insights quickly. Heap's recent acquisition by ContentSquare adds to its value, providing extensive integration options. Additionally, tools like Optimizely enable real-time testing and monitoring, helping to address common issues with testing programs, such as delays in analysis. This ensures that insights are surfaced and shared efficiently. As long as the backend data is properly tagged, a layperson seeking data can access insights quickly. They can generate reports and find the information they need within minutes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight-point five out of ten.
Use Mixpanel?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Insurance Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Educational Organization
38%
Computer Software Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Heap?
It's pretty costly, and they use the common model of impressions. It's impression-based pricing, which can be costly for websites with high traffic.
What needs improvement with Heap?
From a user perspective, customizing the interface could offer more flexibility. Customizing and branding the visuals a little bit better would take them to the next level.
What advice do you have for others considering Heap?
Heap is quite user-friendly, featuring a primarily no-code interface for primary stakeholders. Some technical skills are required for administrators. However, based on my experience, Heap's design ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zendesk, Marketo, Ernst & Young, Salesforce
DocuSign, Uber, Rakuten Viber, Twitter, Skyscanner, Lemonade, Expedia, ZipRecruiter. Meet our customers: https://mixpanel.com/customers
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Amplitude, Matomo and others in Web Analytics. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.