Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Helix ALM vs IBM Rational Focal Point comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Helix ALM is praised for its scalability, integration, and stable performance, making it ideal for large, growing teams and projects.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Helix ALM excels in managing requirements, tracking issues, and test management with flexibility, customization, robust traceability, and integration capabilities.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
7.0
Users find Helix ALM slow, unintuitive, with limited reporting, poor integration, and inadequate documentation.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.5
Helix ALM's customer service is praised for being responsive, knowledgeable, and efficient, aiding users with excellent support and onboarding.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
Helix ALM is praised for its robust performance, reliability, and high responsiveness, especially during complex tasks and updates.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Helix ALM provides scalable, flexible pricing with per-user costs based on modules, and discounts for higher user counts.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Helix ALM
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
7th
Average Rating
6.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (18th), Test Management Tools (14th)
IBM Rational Focal Point
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Helix ALM is 4.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational Focal Point is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management
 

Featured Reviews

Harold Pogue - PeerSpot reviewer
Helix ALM is insanely configurable, with great traceability, and flexibility
The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility. One thing that distinguishes Helix ALM from other solutions is that it is a hybrid cloud model. Helix ALM is not a full cloud implementation like Valerian, Jira Jama, or Atlassian, where we just go through a browser onto the cloud. In the case of Helix, we have code that goes on our computer and then that communicates to the cloud. We have the backup and distribution capability of the cloud, but we have code executing on our machine, and we don't need to worry much about speed and internet lag problems.
Use IBM Rational Focal Point?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Helix ALM?
I rate the product price a nine on a one to ten scale, where one is low price and ten is high price.
What needs improvement with Helix ALM?
Helix ALM should be able to integrate with other systems better. Helix ALM should also have an easier user interface, and the solution needs to have drag-and-drop tools included in it.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

TestTrack
Rational Focal Point
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForce
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.