Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements comparison

Perforce and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. Perforce is ranked #7 with an average rating of 5.5, while Siemens is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Perforce holds a 4.6% mindshare in ARM, compared to Siemens’s 15.6% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Helix ALM

Read 7 Helix ALM reviews

1,089 Views
867 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Polarion Requirements

Read 13 Polarion Requirements reviews

3,072 Views
2,598 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Helix ALM

Polarion Requirements

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Helix ALM and Polarion Requirements based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Helix ALM

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

7th

Average Rating

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (18th), Test Management Tools (14th)

Polarion Requirements

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Helix ALM is 4.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion Requirements is 15.6%, up from 15.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Harold Pogue

Global IT Director of Digital Platforms. Digital and Connected Commerce at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 7, 2022

Helix ALM is insanely configurable, with great traceability, and flexibility

The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility. One thing that distinguishes Helix ALM from other solutions is that it is a hybrid cloud model. Helix ALM is not a full cloud implementation like Valerian, Jira Jama, or Atlassian, where we just go through a browser onto the cloud. In the case of Helix, we have code that goes on our computer and then that communicates to the cloud. We have the backup and distribution capability of the cloud, but we have code executing on our machine, and we don't need to worry much about speed and internet lag problems.

Read full review

JuanCarlos Lopez

Chief Technology Officer at Maval

Aug 25, 2023

Defines, builds, tests and manages complex software systems

We encountered numerous challenges, such as issues with requirements, project management, timing, and planning. The main problem with Polarion at the outset, I believe, was our limited understanding of the planning phase. During that time, we were more focused on change management related to requirements. Recognizing the importance of planning has been a key realization for us. Another mistake we made was not comprehending the need to document these requirements to manage all the work items effectively. Now, we understand the significance of this documentation. As a result of these insights, we have started to see a growing number of competitors from Polarion in this field. One potential improvement could be enabling Polarion to export work items not just to Microsoft Office but also to other office tools

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration."

"The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility."

"The tool offers high stability."

"The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively."

"I like the way this solution is structured."

"My company mainly utilizes the product for documenting internal standards, guidelines, and requirements. Currently, we're focusing on using it for internal purposes, but the vision is to expand its usage to include contract requirements and tracking functionalities. While we're not there yet, it has proven effective for managing our internal documentation needs."

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

"It is easier to produce documents using the platform."

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

"Polarion Requirements' most valuable features are link tracing, book entry, and sequence training features."

More Polarion Requirements pros

Cons

"It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge."

"Helix ALM should be able to integrate with other systems better. Helix ALM should also have an easier user interface, and the solution needs to have drag-and-drop tools included in it."

"The accountability and the equivalent to using, acting, editing, working with Word, and also importing and exporting from Word needs improvement."

"The usability of the solution should also be improved."

"In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users."

"The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult. For different roles, you will need different license models. That seems a little bit difficult for us. Especially when you introduce such a complex system, you want to know the right way is to do licensing. It's not clear what that best way would be. The solution will be here for a long time, and I just think it could be more clear."

"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."

"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management."

"Integration can be a little tricky if you're not aware of basic computer science or programming language."

"Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually."

"The platform's review process for the documents could be better."

More Polarion Requirements cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I give the solution a nine out of ten for pricing."

"I rate the product price a nine on a one to ten scale, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"The product's price is high."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

30%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Helix ALM?

The tool offers high stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Helix ALM?

I rate the product price a nine on a one to ten scale, where one is low price and ten is high price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Helix ALM?

Helix ALM should be able to integrate with other systems better. Helix ALM should also have an easier user interface, and the solution needs to have drag-and-drop tools included in it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Polarion Requirements?

In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have work...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polarion Requirements?

I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion Requirements?

In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily under...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Helix ALM

Compared 63% of the time

Jira vs Helix ALM

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Helix ALM

Compared 8% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Helix ALM

Compared 6% of the time

Jama Connect vs Helix ALM

Compared 4% of the time

More Helix ALM Competitors

IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 62% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 20% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 8% of the time

Jira vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 8% of the time

More Polarion Requirements Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Helix ALM

October 2024

Download Helix ALM product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion Requirements

October 2024

Download Polarion Requirements product report

Also Known As

TestTrack

No data available

Learn More

Perforce

Siemens

Overview

Helix ALM is a comprehensive Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) software platform offered by Perforce. It provides organizations with tools and features to manage the entire lifecycle of software development and product engineering. Helix ALM combines requirements management, test management, issue tracking, and version control into a unified solution, enabling teams to collaborate effectively and ensure the delivery of high-quality software products.

Helix ALM Features:

Requirements Management: Helix ALM allows for capturing, organizing, and managing requirements, ensuring clarity, traceability, and alignment with stakeholders.
Test Management: The platform provides tools for creating, executing, and tracking tests, enabling comprehensive test coverage and quality assurance.
Issue and Defect Tracking: Helix ALM offers robust issue and defect tracking capabilities, allowing teams to log, track, and resolve issues throughout the software development lifecycle.
Version Control Integration: It integrates with version control systems, such as Helix Core, enabling teams to manage source code, track changes, and maintain version history.
Traceability and Impact Analysis: Helix ALM establishes relationships between requirements, tests, defects, and code changes, facilitating traceability and impact analysis to understand the impact of changes and make informed decisions.
Collaboration and Workflow Management: The platform supports collaboration among team members, streamlines workflows, and provides notifications and approvals to ensure efficient progress and timely delivery.
Reporting and Analytics: Helix ALM offers reporting and analytics capabilities to gain insights into project status, quality metrics, and overall performance, aiding in decision-making and process improvement.

Helix ALM Benefits:

Streamlined Development Process: Helix ALM provides a centralized platform that streamlines the software development process, promoting efficient collaboration and coordination among team members.
Improved Collaboration and Communication: The platform facilitates effective collaboration and communication among cross-functional teams, reducing miscommunication and fostering better teamwork.
Enhanced Requirement Management: Helix ALM helps ensure clear, traceable, and well-managed requirements, leading to better understanding and fulfillment of customer needs.
Comprehensive Test Management: With Helix ALM, teams can create, execute, and track tests, ensuring comprehensive test coverage, early defect detection, and improved product quality.
Effective Issue and Defect Tracking: Helix ALM's issue and defect tracking features enable teams to log, track, and resolve issues throughout the development process, ensuring timely issue resolution and reducing the risk of defects in the final product.
Regulatory Compliance Support: Helix ALM provides features to support compliance with industry regulations and standards, offering documentation, audit trails, and version control to meet regulatory requirements.
Increased Visibility and Control: Helix ALM offers transparency and visibility into project status, metrics, and performance, empowering teams with actionable insights to make informed decisions and manage projects effectively.
Scalability and Customization: Helix ALM is a flexible solution that can be tailored to fit the specific needs of different organizations and projects. It scales to accommodate growing teams and supports customization to align with unique processes and workflows.

Reviews from Real Users

Harold Pogue, Global IT Director of Digital Platforms, says that, “The initial setup is complexly straightforward. The vendor offers support where they come and set up the solution for a fee”, and also adds, "The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility.

Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.

Sample Customers

Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForce

NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements

October 2024

Free Report: Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements

Find out what your peers are saying about Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.