Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Polarion Requirements Logo

Polarion Requirements pros and cons

Vendor: Siemens
3.7 out of 5
997 followers
Post review
 

Polarion Requirements Pros review quotes

NK
Mar 7, 2024
We can easily customize it because of the web services and open APIs. Also, the APIs are available. We integrated Polarion with one of Siemens' products, Teamcenter, which is especially useful for automotive industries. There is an open API for integration with Jira as well, so for me, customization is a strong point.
Read full review
IZ
Oct 13, 2019
I like the way this solution is structured.
Read full review
it_user793713 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 5, 2019
The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now.
Read full review
Buyer's Guide
Polarion Requirements
December 2024
Free Report: Polarion Requirements Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about Polarion Requirements. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IZ
Jan 15, 2020
A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization.
Read full review
Sutapa Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 14, 2023
The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2024
In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 20, 2020
Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable.
Read full review
reviewer2009157 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 11, 2022
I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is.
Read full review
reviewer2264979 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 19, 2024
My company mainly utilizes the product for documenting internal standards, guidelines, and requirements. Currently, we're focusing on using it for internal purposes, but the vision is to expand its usage to include contract requirements and tracking functionalities. While we're not there yet, it has proven effective for managing our internal documentation needs.
Read full review
Priya Gupta - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2023
Polarion Requirements' most valuable features are link tracing, book entry, and sequence training features.
Read full review
Show 2 more reviews (out of 12)
 

Polarion Requirements Cons review quotes

NK
Mar 7, 2024
The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management.
Read full review
IZ
Oct 13, 2019
If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable.
Read full review
JuanCarlos Lopez - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 25, 2023
We encountered numerous challenges, such as issues with requirements, project management, timing, and planning. The main problem with Polarion at the outset, I believe, was our limited understanding of the planning phase. During that time, we were more focused on change management related to requirements. Recognizing the importance of planning has been a key realization for us. Another mistake we made was not comprehending the need to document these requirements to manage all the work items effectively. Now, we understand the significance of this documentation. As a result of these insights, we have started to see a growing number of competitors from Polarion in this field. One potential improvement could be enabling Polarion to export work items not just to Microsoft Office but also to other office tools.
Read full review
Buyer's Guide
Polarion Requirements
December 2024
Free Report: Polarion Requirements Reviews and More
Learn what your peers think about Polarion Requirements. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user793713 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 5, 2019
The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult. For different roles, you will need different license models. That seems a little bit difficult for us. Especially when you introduce such a complex system, you want to know the right way is to do licensing. It's not clear what that best way would be. The solution will be here for a long time, and I just think it could be more clear.
Read full review
IZ
Jan 15, 2020
It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts.
Read full review
Sutapa Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 14, 2023
The usability of the solution should also be improved.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2024
In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users.
Read full review
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 20, 2020
Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature.
Read full review
reviewer2009157 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 11, 2022
One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration.
Read full review
reviewer2264979 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 19, 2024
Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually.
Read full review
Show 3 more reviews (out of 13)

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Requirements Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Jira vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jira vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements
3SL Cradle vs Polarion Requirements Logo
3SL Cradle vs Polarion Requirements
See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Requirements Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Jira vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jira vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements Logo
IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements Logo
Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements
3SL Cradle vs Polarion Requirements Logo
3SL Cradle vs Polarion Requirements
See all alternatives
Related questions
  • 44
Serena Dimensions RM vs. IBM DOORS
  • 32
How would you compare IBM Rational DOORS with other Application Requirements Management solutions for IT projects?