HP Wolf Security vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

HP and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while SonicWall is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0. HP holds a 6.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

8,798 Views
7,341 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 9 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,762 Views
1,258 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

SonicWall Capture Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and SonicWall Capture Client are two leading security solutions. While HP Wolf Security receives higher marks for pricing and customer support, SonicWall Capture Client's advanced features justify its higher price.

Features: HP Wolf Security reviews highlight its robust protection against malware, strong isolation capabilities, and excellent pricing. SonicWall Capture Client is praised for its advanced threat detection, seamless integration with various security tools, and comprehensive suite of features.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest HP Wolf Security could improve by enhancing reporting tools, reducing resource consumption, and expanding integration capabilities. SonicWall Capture Client users seek better user training resources, more frequent updates, and improved customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security users report an easy deployment process and commendable customer service. SonicWall Capture Client also has a straightforward deployment with mixed reviews about customer service effectiveness. HP Wolf Security's superior customer service gives it an advantage here.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is considered more cost-effective with a favorable ROI due to its lower setup costs. SonicWall Capture Client, while more expensive, is deemed worth the investment by users for its extensive features. HP Wolf Security provides better immediate ROI, but SonicWall's ROI improves over time with ongoing protection and advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

31st

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

33rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

47th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

44th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 6.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

LUIZ FERNANDO MARIANO SILVA

Data Office Protect - DPO at DATATRUSTY TECNOLOGIA

Enables faster updates and provides an easy-to-use user interface

I have an advanced license that includes all features. Though we have the license, we cannot use it completely because it is not enabled in the Microsoft tier. It does not make sense. We do not want to buy it separately because the price is different if we buy separate licenses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."

"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."

"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."

"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."

"The threat protection feature of SonicWall Capture Client is most valuable."

"The product’s interface is easy to use."

"The solution serves as a very stable platform."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

Cons

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."

"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

"It takes technical support too long to resolve an issue."

"They should improve their user interface."

"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."

"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."

"The implementation is not easy."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

"The product is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Educational Organization

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client could benefit from an improved graphical user interface with more modern and minimal icons. Additionally, one of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier lic...

See all answers

Comparisons

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 16% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 14% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 7% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

April 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

April 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Valspar

Luton College

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client

April 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.