HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while Supermicro is ranked #8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 9.9% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 140 HPE BladeSystem reviews

2,492 Views
2,442 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

944 Views
831 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and Supermicro SuperBlade compete in the server blade market, each offering distinct advantages. HPE BladeSystem stands out for its support and integration capabilities, while Supermicro SuperBlade is appealing for advanced features that cater to technical needs.

Features: HPE BladeSystem features robust management tools, seamless integration within HPE’s ecosystem, and comprehensive centralized management. In contrast, Supermicro SuperBlade offers scalability, cutting-edge processor support, and high-performance features that address intensive computational tasks.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem may improve in areas of cost-efficiency and embracing newer technologies. While HPE focuses on integration, advancements in processor performance could enhance its appeal. Supermicro SuperBlade could enhance user-friendliness and customer support options, while addressing integration challenges with other systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem provides thorough installation support with excellent customer service, ensuring seamless integration. Supermicro SuperBlade offers deployment options tailored to high-performance needs but may require more technical expertise. HPE emphasizes ease of integration, whereas Supermicro is geared towards performance-focused setups.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem typically involves a higher initial cost with a focus on long-term value and support ROI. Supermicro SuperBlade offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to performance-oriented clients, leading to quicker ROI in such environments. The key contrast lies in HPE’s investment in support services versus Supermicro’s cost-effective raw performance.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,606 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

140

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 9.9%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 8.2%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE BladeSystem	9.9%
Supermicro SuperBlade	8.2%
Other	81.9%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Reliability and reasonable pricing enhance data center management

I researched on peerspot.com about IT solutions, specifically about HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy, because we are already using HP servers in our state data center. In HP Cloud System, we are using a converged infrastructure to connect LAN and SAN connectivity across the network. Regarding Virtual Connect technology, there is a noticeable impact on network management. For day-to-day operations, we use various applications such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams to connect virtually. Using HPE BladeSystem Virtual Connect technology in HP Cloud System, we achieve efficient network management with well-defined LAN and SAN connectivity. We already have a defined modular architecture in place designed by the HP team for our data center. My company name is National Institute for Smart Government, also called NISG, under the National e-Governance Division. My title is Technology Management Consultant. I would rate HPE BladeSystem as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable, dependable solution."

"HPE BladeSystem provides good commuting performance."

"It is not expensive."

"The solution uses less cabling and less space in the data center."

"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is simplified management."

"The most valuable feature of the HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management."

"For me, the most valuable features are integration and simple defining."

"With just one cable, for redundancy let's say two, you can feed sixteen servers in a single c7000 chassis."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

Cons

"For me, the product is okay, but I would probably suggest improvement in their services or technical support. They need to work harder in the preventative maintenance of the system. They need to improve in terms of how quickly can we get attention and how quickly problems are resolved. Its price could also be lower."

"We would like to see OneView software features as an additional feature."

"We sometimes have compatibility issues depending on the browser that you are using. For example, sometimes you have to switch between Edge, Mozilla, Internet Explorer, or Chrome to have things operating correctly."

"There have been some hardware failures with them. These failures have since been solved by HPE support partners."

"I rate the stability of HPE BladeSystem a nine out of ten."

"It will be discontinued so we will have to change to another product shortly."

"HPE BladeSystems is an old technology that cannot fit all of the dynamic organizational needs of our company."

"The support from HPE has not been satisfactory in the last two to three years."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"The solution does not scale well."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price for HPE BladeSystem can vary between $100,000 to $1 million or above. The price can be high."

"The pricing is competitive."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"Regarding the cost, HPE BladeSystem is not cheap. The solution and its support are costly, and there are challenges with renewal and pricing, especially in Nigeria, due to the dollar rate and FX issues. However, it is reliable. I don't have specific figures for licensing costs, as the procurement and finance departments handle them."

"The HPE BladeSystem is an expensive solution."

"We have an annual license."

"The price of HPE BladeSystem could improve. They need to reduce the price to be able to compete better with other vendors, such as Dell."

"The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	104

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 38% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 6% of the time

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 5% of the time

Intel MFSYS25 vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 18% of the time

NEC Sigmablade-H vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 7% of the time

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 7% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

February 2026

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

February 2026

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

SuperBlade

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Supermicro SuperBlade offers a scalable and efficient server solution designed to maximize performance and reduce operational costs, making it ideal for dynamic IT environments.

Recognized for its modular architecture, Supermicro SuperBlade enhances computing performance, facilitating seamless workloads in high-demand industries. Its innovative design allows organizations to efficiently handle complex operations with reduced power consumption and optimized resource allocation.

What are the most important features?

Modular Design: Enables seamless integration and scalability to meet growing IT demands.
High-Density Computing: Maximizes space usage with increased compute density.
Flexible Configuration: Supports diverse hardware configurations for various application needs.
Reduced Power Consumption: Offers energy-efficient operations, lowering operational expenses.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure and maintenance costs through optimized resource use.
Scalability: Provides the capability to expand IT capacity without significant downtime.
Performance Optimization: Enhances performance with high-density design tailored for demanding workloads.
Energy Savings: Lowers electricity usage, contributing to sustainability goals.

In sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology, Supermicro SuperBlade is implemented to support critical data processing and complex computational tasks. Its adaptability and robust performance cater to industry-specific applications and IT infrastructure demands, ensuring reliable and scalable operations.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Prace

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

February 2026

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.