HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Supermicro is ranked #8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 10.5% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 139 HPE BladeSystem reviews

2,114 Views
2,072 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

869 Views
747 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and Supermicro SuperBlade compete in the server blade market, each offering distinct advantages. HPE BladeSystem stands out for its support and integration capabilities, while Supermicro SuperBlade is appealing for advanced features that cater to technical needs.

Features: HPE BladeSystem features robust management tools, seamless integration within HPE’s ecosystem, and comprehensive centralized management. In contrast, Supermicro SuperBlade offers scalability, cutting-edge processor support, and high-performance features that address intensive computational tasks.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem may improve in areas of cost-efficiency and embracing newer technologies. While HPE focuses on integration, advancements in processor performance could enhance its appeal. Supermicro SuperBlade could enhance user-friendliness and customer support options, while addressing integration challenges with other systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem provides thorough installation support with excellent customer service, ensuring seamless integration. Supermicro SuperBlade offers deployment options tailored to high-performance needs but may require more technical expertise. HPE emphasizes ease of integration, whereas Supermicro is geared towards performance-focused setups.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem typically involves a higher initial cost with a focus on long-term value and support ROI. Supermicro SuperBlade offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to performance-oriented clients, leading to quicker ROI in such environments. The key contrast lies in HPE’s investment in support services versus Supermicro’s cost-effective raw performance.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 10.5%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 8.0%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE BladeSystem	10.5%
Supermicro SuperBlade	8.0%
Other	81.5%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Reliability and reasonable pricing enhance data center management

I researched on peerspot.com about IT solutions, specifically about HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy, because we are already using HP servers in our state data center. In HP Cloud System, we are using a converged infrastructure to connect LAN and SAN connectivity across the network. Regarding Virtual Connect technology, there is a noticeable impact on network management. For day-to-day operations, we use various applications such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams to connect virtually. Using HPE BladeSystem Virtual Connect technology in HP Cloud System, we achieve efficient network management with well-defined LAN and SAN connectivity. We already have a defined modular architecture in place designed by the HP team for our data center. My company name is National Institute for Smart Government, also called NISG, under the National e-Governance Division. My title is Technology Management Consultant. I would rate HPE BladeSystem as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very easy to use."

"The virtual connect and network management port is a valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of the HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management and the robust design."

"The most valuable feature, of course, is its size as I can build a huge compute resource on it."

"We were pleased with the stability of the system as there were no downtimes for the last ten years due to hardware failures."

"The product has a lot of options for checking servers and IoT ports using artificial intelligence."

"I like the stability."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ease of management with the hardware."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

Cons

"HPE BladeSystem could improve the communication between the server and the storage."

"The servers are a little bit huge, so it would be great if they could renew the size."

"If you compare it with Lenovo systems, the pricing is too high."

"The management side of this solution could be improved."

"I am not sure if iLO is included or if there is a separate license. If it is not included, it should be included in the license. It is such a valuable feature especially because people are working remotely."

"It will be discontinued so we will have to change to another product shortly."

"OA updates and upgrades have to be made simpler."

"Creating an integrated solution could make HPE BladeSystem more appealing."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"The solution does not scale well."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have access to your financial information or the specific details of this solution's pricing. There are no additional fees. It is the hardware and the support."

"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."

"BladeSystem is a little bit cheaper."

"The HPE BladeSystem is an expensive solution."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"The price for HPE BladeSystem can vary between $100,000 to $1 million or above. The price can be high."

"The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."

"The price of HPE BladeSystem could improve. They need to reduce the price to be able to compete better with other vendors, such as Dell."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	103

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 57% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 7% of the time

Dell PowerEdge C- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 5% of the time

HPE NonStop vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 21% of the time

NEC Sigmablade-H vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 14% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Integrity vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 6% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

December 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

December 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

SuperBlade

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Prace

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

December 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.