HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Supermicro is ranked #9. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.9% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 139 HPE BladeSystem reviews

1,900 Views
1,881 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

870 Views
705 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 25, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and Supermicro SuperBlade compete within the server infrastructure market. Supermicro SuperBlade holds an advantage in advanced features, while HPE BladeSystem shines in customer support and competitive pricing.

Features: HPE BladeSystem offers versatility, integration capabilities, and powerful virtualization features. Supermicro SuperBlade features a comprehensive modular design, high-density computing, and advanced scalability.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could enhance its modularity and expandability options and improve its web management interface. Supermicro SuperBlade can work on simplifying deployment, reducing initial costs, and streamlining configuration options for easier use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem provides streamlined deployment processes and robust support. Supermicro SuperBlade, while requiring more technical adjustments during deployment, offers responsive customer service to address these challenges.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem is a budget-friendly choice with a reasonable ROI. In contrast, Supermicro SuperBlade demands a higher upfront investment but promises significant ROI through enhanced computing capacity.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 13.9%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 6.2%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Fatai Akinwande

Specialist Datacenter and Server at IHS Towers

Enables you to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView feature

In terms of improvements, I'd suggest enhancing the stability of the HPE BladeSystem, especially regarding network connectivity. We once had an issue where a system didn’t communicate with the network, and it took a while to diagnose the problem. Eventually, we discovered it was a motherboard issue, but we initially thought it was the network card. Improving the onboard administratordashboard to provide more granular insights, like clearly identifying faultycomponents, would make troubleshooting much more efficient. Aside from that, the system is superb and has been reliable.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is its upgradability and centralized configuration."

"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is simplified management."

"The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use."

"HPE BladeSystem provides good commuting performance."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"The robustness and the connectivity between all servers and the storage aspect are the most beneficial features of HPE BladeSystem."

"The product has a lot of options for checking servers and IoT ports using artificial intelligence."

"The density of the BladeSystem, that we can keep adding blades as we need more VMs."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

Cons

"In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors."

"The scalability is limited because you only have a 16-server by chassis."

"We would like to see OneView software features as an additional feature."

"HPE BladeSystems is an old technology that cannot fit all of the dynamic organizational needs of our company."

"I'd like to see an all-in-one packet in the future."

"They should provide open learning materials and seminars for detailed knowledge of the product."

"The latest version of this system is called Synergy from HPE, and it comes with more advanced features. This is currently the most advanced solution available in the market. One of its key features is its energy efficiency, which optimizes energy usage."

"The only side that must be improved is the active-passive interconnect module architecture."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"The solution does not scale well."

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."

"The pricing is competitive."

"Their licensing program is pretty simple."

"Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."

"When you purchase HPE BladeSystem you have to pay for the support service. The first three years are covered under the warranty, and for any further support, you have to pay annually. When comparing the cost of HPE BladeSystem to other vendors, the fees are less expensive."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 62% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 7% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge M vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 24% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 18% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 13% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

July 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

July 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

SuperBlade

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Prace

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

July 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.