HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Superdome X comparison

HPE BladeSystem and HPE Superdome X are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. HPE BladeSystem is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while HPE Superdome X is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. HPE BladeSystem holds a 11.7% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to HPE Superdome X’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of HPE BladeSystem users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of HPE Superdome X users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 139 HPE BladeSystem reviews

2,114 Views
2,072 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

HPE Superdome X

Read 11 HPE Superdome X reviews

1,095 Views
1,084 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

HPE Superdome X

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and HPE Superdome X are competing in enterprise server solutions. While HPE BladeSystem is favored for pricing and management simplicity, HPE Superdome X holds an advantage with its advanced features for high-demand, data-intensive environments.

Features: HPE BladeSystem offers a modular design, ease of integration, and centralized management through a single interface. HPE Superdome X provides high-performance capabilities, advanced reliability features, and superior data processing power.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could enhance high-computation processing power and add more advanced reliability features. There is also room to improve its efficiency in data-intensive environments. HPE Superdome X could use a more straightforward deployment process, greater budget accessibility, and improved modularity for better adaptability in smaller infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem excels in fast deployment and simple integration, often preferred in less complex environments. HPE Superdome X, although more complex in setup, benefits from comprehensive support and customer service to manage its sophisticated deployment.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem is appealing with its lower initial setup cost, providing immediate returns for organizations with limited budgets. HPE Superdome X, although requiring greater investment, promises significant ROI through enhanced performance for intensive computing tasks.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Superdome X Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Superdome X

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Superdome X

Ranking in Blade Servers

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 11.7%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Superdome X is 8.6%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE BladeSystem	11.7%
HPE Superdome X	8.6%
Other	79.7%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Reliability and reasonable pricing enhance data center management

I researched on peerspot.com about IT solutions, specifically about HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy, because we are already using HP servers in our state data center. In HP Cloud System, we are using a converged infrastructure to connect LAN and SAN connectivity across the network. Regarding Virtual Connect technology, there is a noticeable impact on network management. For day-to-day operations, we use various applications such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams to connect virtually. Using HPE BladeSystem Virtual Connect technology in HP Cloud System, we achieve efficient network management with well-defined LAN and SAN connectivity. We already have a defined modular architecture in place designed by the HP team for our data center. My company name is National Institute for Smart Government, also called NISG, under the National e-Governance Division. My title is Technology Management Consultant. I would rate HPE BladeSystem as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2056329

Professor at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Robust product, helped with workload management and offers remote configuration

In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful. One other problem is energy consumption. We are forced to use both chassis even when we only need, for example, all four processors. It's not always used at full capacity every day. When underutilized, we still need to have both chassis powered, which creates an energy consumption issue. While the machine can be configured to reduce consumption, the idea of having different possible configurations with varying chassis usage, similar to the Flex version, could be interesting for this model, too. This model leverages specific features of the Intel MAP board, so switching like in the Flex might be difficult due to the motherboard switching involved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very scalable."

"The product has been simple to set up."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its high availability."

"The solution has high performance."

"HPE BladeSystem is very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of the HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management."

"They are reliable, and it's relatively easy to manage them. They also regularly provide patching for the servers."

"One of the most valuable features I have found to be the enclosure. It is really easy to manage and everything is integrated. You are able to upgrade the software quite easily."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"This product is very reliable."

"The most valuable features of HPE Superdome X are speed, performance, and resilience."

"We've got a few of them, because we needed some really large machines. So far, they've been working pretty good."

"One of the really cool things about Superdome is, depending on the model you choose, you can put 8-16 blades in it."

"I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable."

"Superdome X is a system that can compete in terms of performance and uptime, but it's now standard. That is the great value. There are competitors like IBM, for example, but IBM has a propietary operating system. With Superdome X, you have a system that can run Windows, Red Hat, or VMware, but in a mission critical server."

"SDX gave us a very large RAM and we need that for the large-scale graph-handling applications."

Cons

"The solution could improve by having more automation, such as the automatic mapping feature that is available in the Synergy Blade series."

"For me, the product is okay, but I would probably suggest improvement in their services or technical support. They need to work harder in the preventative maintenance of the system. They need to improve in terms of how quickly can we get attention and how quickly problems are resolved. Its price could also be lower."

"They could include some embedded software for container technology."

"It could always use new tools."

"HPE BladeSystem that we are using is currently very old. It's not too good. We haven't renewed it. I would like the solution to have more updates."

"HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring."

"I rate the stability of HPE BladeSystem a nine out of ten."

"The problem is that when want to expand with a new chassis, you have to do everything manually. It's not automatic."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"HPE Superdome X can improve by adding a lot of cloud capabilities to allow this solution to be cloud-ready in case the customer wants to move it to the cloud."

"I know we support Windows and I think it's Red Hat, and I'd like to see more OSs supported."

"I'd like to see the onboarding of some storage class memory to really expand the already very large RAM, into something that could be even much bigger."

"What would make it better from my point of view is if HPE spent more time on testing with the actual built-in Red Hat Linux drivers, as opposed to always trying to say, "Use our driver.""

"It would be helpful if you could do the maintenance completely online."

"In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be cheaper."

"The price of HPE BladeSystem is less expensive than some other solutions, such as Dell. The cost of replacement equipment is expensive."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

"Its pricing was good. We selected this solution because it was within our budget. We paid just once when we bought it. We never bought any license."

"The product’s price is high compared to one of its competitors."

"The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive."

"There is a very expensive one-time cost with no licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	103

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE Superdome X?

I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Superdome X?

The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Superdome X?

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 57% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 14% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Dell PowerEdge C- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 30% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 17% of the time

Lenovo Flex System vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Integrity vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerEdge C- Series vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Superdome X Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

December 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

December 2025

Download HPE Superdome X product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

HP Integrity Superdome, HP Superdome X

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

HPE Superdome X is an HPE server that represents a new category of x86 modular, mission-critical systems to consolidate all tiers of critical applications on a common platform. Engineered with trusted Superdome 2 reliability, the HPE Superdome X includes a modular, bladed design, and shares HPE BladeSystem efficiencies including a common server management framework, supported from x86 to Superdome 2. With breakthrough innovations such as the fault-tolerant Crossbar Fabric and Error Analysis Engine coupled with hard partitioning capabilities, Superdome X sets the standard for mission-critical x86 computing.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Pella

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Superdome X

December 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Superdome X

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Superdome X and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Superdome X report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.