HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Supermicro is ranked #11. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.8% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 138 HPE BladeSystem reviews

2,279 Views
1,588 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

787 Views
628 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 20, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and Supermicro SuperBlade are competitive products in the modular server market. Supermicro SuperBlade seems to have the upper hand with advanced features, whereas HPE BladeSystem offers better pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Features: HPE BladeSystem provides seamless integration, scalability, and robust management capabilities, which are beneficial for enterprise environments. Supermicro SuperBlade focuses on high-density computing, enhanced performance features, and efficient use of resources, making it ideal for high-demand applications.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could improve by enhancing performance features, reducing complexity in network integration, and expanding high-demand capabilities. Supermicro SuperBlade could benefit from simplifying its management interface, better documentation for ease of deployment, and reducing compatibility issues with different software environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem is known for easy integration and efficient customer service, enabling smoother deployment. Supermicro SuperBlade, while requiring a learning curve, offers strong post-deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem is noted for competitive setup costs, offering solid long-term ROI. Supermicro SuperBlade requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant returns through efficient task handling.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

138

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 13.8%, down from 17.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 6.6%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

JuanDuque

Manager of Capacity and Control Management at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up

It is very straightforward to set up. It's not complex. The length of deployment depends on the way that you configure the Blades. For example, if you're going to work with VMware, the time could be at least 25 to 30 minutes. It is not going to depend on the BladeSystem; it is going to depend on the time of the operate system deployed. The number of people you need for maintenance depends on the monitoring system that you have. For example, if you have a good monitoring system for this platform you're going to need less than ten specialists, but if you don't have a monitoring system to check the platform, probably you're going to need more than ten people.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its ease of management, consolidation, connectivity, power, and cooling are the most valuable features."

"The solution is very fast and the power consumption is great."

"Remote management features are valuable."

"The most valuable feature of the HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management and the robust design."

"One of the most valuable features I have found to be the enclosure. It is really easy to manage and everything is integrated. You are able to upgrade the software quite easily."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"Currently, we're using HPE BladeSystem BL460, but we're planning to migrate to the Synergy System as part of our strategy since the OEM support for the BL460 will eventually end. The most valuable features are its high computing capability and availability. Additionally, the ability to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView solution that comes with the HP Converge system is incredibly beneficial. The efficientand unique environment makes it an excellent fit for our needs."

"It is not expensive."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

Cons

"I would like to see the upgrade path a little bit smoother."

"HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring."

"They are not selling BladeSystem anymore. The end of the sale of this platform was this year, 2020."

"The only side that must be improved is the active-passive interconnect module architecture."

"We would like to see OneView software features as an additional feature."

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest enhancing the stability of the HPE BladeSystem, especially regarding network connectivity. We once had an issue where a system didn’t communicate with the network, and it took a while to diagnose the problem. Eventually, we discovered it was a motherboard issue, but we initially thought it was the network card. Improving the onboard administratordashboard to provide more granular insights, like clearly identifying faultycomponents, would make troubleshooting much more efficient. Aside from that, the system is superb and has been reliable."

"I am not sure if iLO is included or if there is a separate license. If it is not included, it should be included in the license. It is such a valuable feature especially because people are working remotely."

"The servers are a little bit huge, so it would be great if they could renew the size."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"The solution does not scale well."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

"The price for HPE BladeSystem can vary between $100,000 to $1 million or above. The price can be high."

"The licenses for HPE BladeSystem are perpetual."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."

"Regarding the cost, HPE BladeSystem is not cheap. The solution and its support are costly, and there are challenges with renewal and pricing, especially in Nigeria, due to the dollar rate and FX issues. However, it is reliable. I don't have specific figures for licensing costs, as the procurement and finance departments handle them."

"Their licensing program is pretty simple."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 61% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 12% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 21% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 21% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 21% of the time

HPE Integrity vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 12% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

March 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

March 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

SuperBlade

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Prace

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

March 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.