HPE Superdome X vs HPE Synergy comparison

HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. HPE Superdome X is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while HPE Synergy is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. HPE Superdome X holds a 8.0% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to HPE Synergy’s 14.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HPE Superdome X users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of HPE Synergy users who would recommend it.

HPE Superdome X

Read 11 HPE Superdome X reviews

1,106 Views
1,095 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Synergy

Read 91 HPE Synergy reviews

3,312 Views
2,186 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HPE Superdome X

HPE Synergy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy compete in the enterprise IT market. HPE Synergy has the upper hand in resource management and scalability, while HPE Superdome X excels in performance capabilities.

Features: HPE Superdome X offers high reliability, scalability, and advanced performance in mission-critical environments. It enables the use of large RAM for intensive applications like genomics and machine learning, providing a robust and stable platform. HPE Synergy features an integrated composable infrastructure, which allows easy re-allocation of resources for different workloads. Its central management with HPE OneView simplifies operational integration and enhances flexibility within the IT environment.

Room for Improvement: HPE Superdome X could improve in ease of integration and deployment processes, and could benefit from more intuitive management tools. The complex setup procedures could be streamlined to enhance user experience. HPE Synergy needs improvements in versatility for mixed environments and advanced applications. Enhancing inter-frame storage capabilities and further developing its Image Streamer could add more value to its offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Synergy’s modular architecture facilitates smoother deployment and integration, providing more flexibility and excellent customer support. HPE Superdome X, while reliable, presents a more complex setup process but offers dedicated support services for users. The seamless integration feature is an area where HPE Superdome X could further enhance.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Superdome X entails higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI through its performance in critical applications. HPE Synergy comes with lower initial costs and provides a faster ROI due to its scalable design and reduced deployment expenses, making it a cost-effective solution for dynamic IT environments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,315 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Superdome X

Ranking in Blade Servers

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Synergy

Ranking in Blade Servers

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Composable Infrastructure (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE Superdome X is 8.0%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Synergy is 14.6%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Synergy	14.6%
HPE Superdome X	8.0%
Other	77.4%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

reviewer2056329

Professor at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Robust product, helped with workload management and offers remote configuration

In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful. One other problem is energy consumption. We are forced to use both chassis even when we only need, for example, all four processors. It's not always used at full capacity every day. When underutilized, we still need to have both chassis powered, which creates an energy consumption issue. While the machine can be configured to reduce consumption, the idea of having different possible configurations with varying chassis usage, similar to the Flex version, could be interesting for this model, too. This model leverages specific features of the Intel MAP board, so switching like in the Flex might be difficult due to the motherboard switching involved.

Read full review

Msheroz S

Works at Saudi Telecom Company

Manage servers efficiently with an integrated view while reducing downtime

My use case is to serve the complete IT environment of the telecom, including all cloud applications. I use HPE Synergy servers for my private cloud and for network management systems. 70% of my workload is running on HPE servers The integrated view, such as managing complete servers and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SDX gave us a very large RAM and we need that for the large-scale graph-handling applications."

"One of the really cool things about Superdome is, depending on the model you choose, you can put 8-16 blades in it."

"The most valuable features of HPE Superdome X are speed, performance, and resilience."

"We've got a few of them, because we needed some really large machines. So far, they've been working pretty good."

"Superdome X is a system that can compete in terms of performance and uptime, but it's now standard. That is the great value. There are competitors like IBM, for example, but IBM has a propietary operating system. With Superdome X, you have a system that can run Windows, Red Hat, or VMware, but in a mission critical server."

"I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable."

"This product is very reliable."

"Support is very helpful."

"We've found the scalability to be reasonable if you are ready to invest in it."

"It allows for easy management."

"The benefit is that it's going to be maintained, contrary to what we had last year, when the maintenance went off for the last generation of the servers that we had there."

"Valuable features include its dependability, reliability, and the ease of managing the system."

"We like that the solution can be arranged for an all-in-one single pane of glass, something our customers find important."

"We have more control over the firmware and how we are managing our physical servers."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the ease of management and the integration with OneView."

More HPE Synergy pros

Cons

"In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful."

"It would be helpful if you could do the maintenance completely online."

"HPE Superdome X can improve by adding a lot of cloud capabilities to allow this solution to be cloud-ready in case the customer wants to move it to the cloud."

"I'd like to see the onboarding of some storage class memory to really expand the already very large RAM, into something that could be even much bigger."

"I know we support Windows and I think it's Red Hat, and I'd like to see more OSs supported."

"What would make it better from my point of view is if HPE spent more time on testing with the actual built-in Red Hat Linux drivers, as opposed to always trying to say, "Use our driver.""

"The pricing can be improved as it is a costly solution due to sanctions in Iran."

"It has been in the external integrations to other platforms that we have, which aren't HPE, where some of our challenges have been. I would like to see some integrations with non-HPE platforms."

"I would like the ability to take the storage tray that is in a chassis and share it out to multiple chassis, not just the servers within the same chassis. This would be more efficient with resources."

"The expansion was complex, because adding a second frame onto the original frame caused an outage."

"ICMs could be better in this model. When you look at its competitors, the most critical point is the throughput. HPE is the best with the ICM module, which is an interconnect module that connects the servers of the frames to the LAN and SAN. HPE Synergy should also support the latest processors provided by Intel."

"We had some challenges during the implementation and a few issues afterward, but they were all sort of related to how Synergy interacts with Nexus. Our Nexus on the network side is managed by another group, and they had just gotten Nexus, so they weren't really familiar with how Nexus even worked. Getting these two to interact well was the majority of our issues. It really didn't have anything to do with Synergy. It points to know the environment that you are putting it in and making sure you are dotting all your i's and crossing all your t's when you are figuring out what their requirements are to communicate."

"The main challenge we faced was that when it was installed it just did not work. There were faulty components and it took weeks of troubleshooting to find the faulty components, get them replaced. Getting help from HPE was difficult. Nobody knew about the product. It was a brand-new product and people had not been trained on it. That part was not a great experience."

"Having a seamless DR implementation would help significantly."

More HPE Synergy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a very expensive one-time cost with no licensing fees."

"The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive."

"We do CAPEX."

"The price point is a little high. We were able to get a good deal on a promotion, to go with it. It would be nice to see the prices come down a little bit."

"When we made the purchase of the hardware, we added Professional Services to it."

"We don't have to pay for Synergy because it's part of our plan."

"We outright purchased Synergy."

"We have already paid once. It is just the price for the permit and its use. It seems you don't have to keep paying for it, but I am not sure."

"It costs us around $60,000 a year."

"There was at least about a 20 percent savings in cost over our purchase based on the purchase price of the compute modules themselves versus what we've had to pay before. It was significantly less."

More HPE Synergy pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Superdome X?

I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Superdome X?

The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Superdome X?

See all answers

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Synergy?

As far as the prices are concerned, rack mount solutions are less expensive than HPE Synergy prices; however, HPE Synergy prices are higher but justify themselves as the solution accommodates all t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Synergy?

In my opinion, for future improvements in HPE Synergy, there should be better management of power consumption complexity as well as an increase in the number of servers that can fit in a single Syn...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 28% of the time

Lenovo Flex System vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 14% of the time

HPE Integrity vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 12% of the time

HPE NonStop vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 10% of the time

Fujitsu CX1000 vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE Superdome X Competitors

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Synergy

Compared 22% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Synergy

Compared 20% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 9% of the time

Lenovo ThinkAgile CP Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Synergy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

December 2025

Download HPE Superdome X product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Synergy

January 2026

Download HPE Synergy product report

Also Known As

HP Integrity Superdome, HP Superdome X

No data available

Overview

HPE Superdome X is an HPE server that represents a new category of x86 modular, mission-critical systems to consolidate all tiers of critical applications on a common platform. Engineered with trusted Superdome 2 reliability, the HPE Superdome X includes a modular, bladed design, and shares HPE BladeSystem efficiencies including a common server management framework, supported from x86 to Superdome 2. With breakthrough innovations such as the fault-tolerant Crossbar Fabric and Error Analysis Engine coupled with hard partitioning capabilities, Superdome X sets the standard for mission-critical x86 computing.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Pella

HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United

Buyer's Guide

HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

December 2025

Free Report: HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.