HPE Superdome X vs HPE Synergy comparison

HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. HPE Superdome X is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while HPE Synergy is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. HPE Superdome X holds a 8.0% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to HPE Synergy’s 14.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HPE Superdome X users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of HPE Synergy users who would recommend it.

HPE Superdome X

Read 11 HPE Superdome X reviews

1,106 Views
1,095 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Synergy

Read 91 HPE Synergy reviews

3,312 Views
2,186 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HPE Superdome X

HPE Synergy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy compete in the enterprise IT market. HPE Synergy has the upper hand in resource management and scalability, while HPE Superdome X excels in performance capabilities.

Features: HPE Superdome X offers high reliability, scalability, and advanced performance in mission-critical environments. It enables the use of large RAM for intensive applications like genomics and machine learning, providing a robust and stable platform. HPE Synergy features an integrated composable infrastructure, which allows easy re-allocation of resources for different workloads. Its central management with HPE OneView simplifies operational integration and enhances flexibility within the IT environment.

Room for Improvement: HPE Superdome X could improve in ease of integration and deployment processes, and could benefit from more intuitive management tools. The complex setup procedures could be streamlined to enhance user experience. HPE Synergy needs improvements in versatility for mixed environments and advanced applications. Enhancing inter-frame storage capabilities and further developing its Image Streamer could add more value to its offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Synergy’s modular architecture facilitates smoother deployment and integration, providing more flexibility and excellent customer support. HPE Superdome X, while reliable, presents a more complex setup process but offers dedicated support services for users. The seamless integration feature is an area where HPE Superdome X could further enhance.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Superdome X entails higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI through its performance in critical applications. HPE Synergy comes with lower initial costs and provides a faster ROI due to its scalable design and reduced deployment expenses, making it a cost-effective solution for dynamic IT environments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,282 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Superdome X

Ranking in Blade Servers

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Synergy

Ranking in Blade Servers

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Composable Infrastructure (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE Superdome X is 8.0%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Synergy is 14.6%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Synergy	14.6%
HPE Superdome X	8.0%
Other	77.4%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

reviewer2056329

Professor at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Robust product, helped with workload management and offers remote configuration

In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful. One other problem is energy consumption. We are forced to use both chassis even when we only need, for example, all four processors. It's not always used at full capacity every day. When underutilized, we still need to have both chassis powered, which creates an energy consumption issue. While the machine can be configured to reduce consumption, the idea of having different possible configurations with varying chassis usage, similar to the Flex version, could be interesting for this model, too. This model leverages specific features of the Intel MAP board, so switching like in the Flex might be difficult due to the motherboard switching involved.

Read full review

Msheroz S

Works at Saudi Telecom Company

Manage servers efficiently with an integrated view while reducing downtime

My use case is to serve the complete IT environment of the telecom, including all cloud applications. I use HPE Synergy servers for my private cloud and for network management systems. 70% of my workload is running on HPE servers The integrated view, such as managing complete servers and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable."

"SDX gave us a very large RAM and we need that for the large-scale graph-handling applications."

"This product is very reliable."

"We've got a few of them, because we needed some really large machines. So far, they've been working pretty good."

"The most valuable features of HPE Superdome X are speed, performance, and resilience."

"One of the really cool things about Superdome is, depending on the model you choose, you can put 8-16 blades in it."

"Superdome X is a system that can compete in terms of performance and uptime, but it's now standard. That is the great value. There are competitors like IBM, for example, but IBM has a propietary operating system. With Superdome X, you have a system that can run Windows, Red Hat, or VMware, but in a mission critical server."

"The processing time has been about 50 times faster and allows us to do AI models."

"It is helping us sort of bridge a gap that we are having moving off of old legacy systems, like HP-UX systems and trying to move over to x86. So, it is helping fill a hardware gap that a lot of our platforms have needed in the past."

"The hyper-converged infrastructure where everything is stateless is valuable. Basically, you have your compute storage and networking management."

"We bought it with the intent to replace the c7000 workstation blades. It is bigger than the workstation blades in core count, memory, and graphical capabilities. So, it has broadened us in that regard, and we have more capabilities."

"The stability of the solution is very reliable."

"We're able to provision different applications, different demonstrations, add cloud-like speeds on-prem, which is unheard of in the industry."

"We have more control over the firmware and how we are managing our physical servers."

"The Synergy environment provides us with one view. We're able to manage the entire stack, top to bottom, from that single view."

More HPE Synergy pros

Cons

"I know we support Windows and I think it's Red Hat, and I'd like to see more OSs supported."

"It would be helpful if you could do the maintenance completely online."

"HPE Superdome X can improve by adding a lot of cloud capabilities to allow this solution to be cloud-ready in case the customer wants to move it to the cloud."

"What would make it better from my point of view is if HPE spent more time on testing with the actual built-in Red Hat Linux drivers, as opposed to always trying to say, "Use our driver.""

"In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful."

"I'd like to see the onboarding of some storage class memory to really expand the already very large RAM, into something that could be even much bigger."

"Product documentation is disorganized."

"Over the two years of using HPE Synergy, we have found some hardware failures that are frequent in the SOP models, CNA cards, and converged network adapters. These failures are frequently happening for a lot of the customers."

"The lowest echelon of HPE technical support is sadly uninformed, unknowledgeable, and dependent on wrote scripts. They won't answer a question without going through their script. It's not like you're actually talking to somebody who has any depth or time using any of the equipment."

"The stability is not good right now. We have had a couple of outages where we have receive very good support from HPE. However, we have not been able to come up with cut and dried reasons for why the outages have occurred. They have not been able to be reproduced, so it has been difficult getting our trust back."

"The deployment time of a system through OneView is pretty slow, but apparently that's being addressed in an upcoming update."

"One of the issues that we that we have been having is with the firmware baselining. So, we need to just making sure that we get that working. However, we are in the early stages. It may well be that we just tweak a few things."

"There is certainly a feature or two missing."

"The Synergy platform is HPE-specific and more for on-premises. You're kind of locked in with VMware and the HPE with the VMs. The Nutanix offering is a bit more flexible."

More HPE Synergy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a very expensive one-time cost with no licensing fees."

"The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive."

"Nutanix was really hard to implement, and it was very pricey compared to what we get from Synergy."

"When we made the purchase of the hardware, we added Professional Services to it."

"Our IT infrastructure costs have gone up each year by 20 percent."

"We pay for licensing on the fibre channel uplinks, on the Virtual Connect, which is an add-on."

"We outright purchased Synergy."

"We bought everything outright to start with. We don't do much consumption-based stuff."

"We pay about £500 for the solution."

"We do a biannual renewal. I know how much that renewal is, but I don't know how much it breaks down to be just Synergy, since we have our VMware, all of our physical equipment, etc. all rolled up into one renewal, which is a little over $300,000 every two years. However, only a subset of that is the Synergy product."

More HPE Synergy pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Superdome X?

I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Superdome X?

The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Superdome X?

See all answers

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Synergy?

As far as the prices are concerned, rack mount solutions are less expensive than HPE Synergy prices; however, HPE Synergy prices are higher but justify themselves as the solution accommodates all t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Synergy?

In my opinion, for future improvements in HPE Synergy, there should be better management of power consumption complexity as well as an increase in the number of servers that can fit in a single Syn...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 25% of the time

Lenovo Flex System vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Integrity vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 11% of the time

HPE NonStop vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 10% of the time

Fujitsu CX1000 vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 7% of the time

More HPE Superdome X Competitors

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Synergy

Compared 22% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Synergy

Compared 20% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 8% of the time

Lenovo ThinkAgile CP Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Synergy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

January 2026

Download HPE Superdome X product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Synergy

January 2026

Download HPE Synergy product report

Also Known As

HP Integrity Superdome, HP Superdome X

No data available

Overview

HPE Superdome X is an HPE server that represents a new category of x86 modular, mission-critical systems to consolidate all tiers of critical applications on a common platform. Engineered with trusted Superdome 2 reliability, the HPE Superdome X includes a modular, bladed design, and shares HPE BladeSystem efficiencies including a common server management framework, supported from x86 to Superdome 2. With breakthrough innovations such as the fault-tolerant Crossbar Fabric and Error Analysis Engine coupled with hard partitioning capabilities, Superdome X sets the standard for mission-critical x86 computing.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Pella

HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United

Buyer's Guide

HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

December 2025

Free Report: HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.