HPE Superdome X vs HPE Synergy comparison

HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. HPE Superdome X is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while HPE Synergy is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. HPE Superdome X holds a 7.4% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to HPE Synergy’s 12.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HPE Superdome X users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of HPE Synergy users who would recommend it.

HPE Superdome X

Read 11 HPE Superdome X reviews

1,154 Views
1,142 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Synergy

Read 91 HPE Synergy reviews

3,502 Views
2,276 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HPE Superdome X

HPE Synergy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy compete in the enterprise IT market. HPE Synergy has the upper hand in resource management and scalability, while HPE Superdome X excels in performance capabilities.

Features: HPE Superdome X offers high reliability, scalability, and advanced performance in mission-critical environments. It enables the use of large RAM for intensive applications like genomics and machine learning, providing a robust and stable platform. HPE Synergy features an integrated composable infrastructure, which allows easy re-allocation of resources for different workloads. Its central management with HPE OneView simplifies operational integration and enhances flexibility within the IT environment.

Room for Improvement: HPE Superdome X could improve in ease of integration and deployment processes, and could benefit from more intuitive management tools. The complex setup procedures could be streamlined to enhance user experience. HPE Synergy needs improvements in versatility for mixed environments and advanced applications. Enhancing inter-frame storage capabilities and further developing its Image Streamer could add more value to its offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Synergy’s modular architecture facilitates smoother deployment and integration, providing more flexibility and excellent customer support. HPE Superdome X, while reliable, presents a more complex setup process but offers dedicated support services for users. The seamless integration feature is an area where HPE Superdome X could further enhance.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Superdome X entails higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI through its performance in critical applications. HPE Synergy comes with lower initial costs and provides a faster ROI due to its scalable design and reduced deployment expenses, making it a cost-effective solution for dynamic IT environments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Superdome X

Ranking in Blade Servers

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Synergy

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Composable Infrastructure (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE Superdome X is 7.4%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Synergy is 12.7%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Synergy	12.7%
HPE Superdome X	7.4%
Other	79.9%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

reviewer2056329

Professor at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Robust product, helped with workload management and offers remote configuration

In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful. One other problem is energy consumption. We are forced to use both chassis even when we only need, for example, all four processors. It's not always used at full capacity every day. When underutilized, we still need to have both chassis powered, which creates an energy consumption issue. While the machine can be configured to reduce consumption, the idea of having different possible configurations with varying chassis usage, similar to the Flex version, could be interesting for this model, too. This model leverages specific features of the Intel MAP board, so switching like in the Flex might be difficult due to the motherboard switching involved.

Read full review

Msheroz S

Works at Saudi Telecom Company

Manage servers efficiently with an integrated view while reducing downtime

My use case is to serve the complete IT environment of the telecom, including all cloud applications. I use HPE Synergy servers for my private cloud and for network management systems. 70% of my workload is running on HPE servers The integrated view, such as managing complete servers and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've got a few of them, because we needed some really large machines. So far, they've been working pretty good."

"I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable."

"Superdome X is a system that can compete in terms of performance and uptime, but it's now standard. That is the great value. There are competitors like IBM, for example, but IBM has a propietary operating system. With Superdome X, you have a system that can run Windows, Red Hat, or VMware, but in a mission critical server."

"One of the really cool things about Superdome is, depending on the model you choose, you can put 8-16 blades in it."

"The most valuable features of HPE Superdome X are speed, performance, and resilience."

"SDX gave us a very large RAM and we need that for the large-scale graph-handling applications."

"This product is very reliable."

"The solution is built very well. It's very robust and durable."

"It is really easy to use, because it's GUI-based. It is not command line based, like mainframes."

"For me, this is the best frame server technology available in the market. We can compare it to Cisco UCS. It is robust and stable, and it is also easy to deploy and scale. Their support is the best."

"In terms of managing our IT landscape, it helps by reducing complexity... We've taken one of our virtualization guys and turned him into a Synergy guy, and he's been able to understand the networking, he's been able to understand the OneView, he's been able to understand the Synergy. He manages all of those rather than our having to have multiple teams associated with it."

"The solution help us to implement new business requirements quickly, since it is easy and quick to upgrade our capacity."

"The price is reasonable, and the stability and scalability are okay. We bought the solution because it suits our needs."

"There is no problem with the scalability."

"The initial setup is fine."

More HPE Synergy pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if you could do the maintenance completely online."

"I'd like to see the onboarding of some storage class memory to really expand the already very large RAM, into something that could be even much bigger."

"HPE Superdome X can improve by adding a lot of cloud capabilities to allow this solution to be cloud-ready in case the customer wants to move it to the cloud."

"In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful."

"I know we support Windows and I think it's Red Hat, and I'd like to see more OSs supported."

"What would make it better from my point of view is if HPE spent more time on testing with the actual built-in Red Hat Linux drivers, as opposed to always trying to say, "Use our driver.""

"It would be nice if the updates were not accompanied by downtime."

"It has affected the productivity of our development team in a bad way. When we first stood the hardware up 18 months ago, the image streaming capacity and capability were not very good at all. We had hoped that it would allow us to be more composable and be able to switch over from one version of an operating system to another version of an operating system. However, it wasn't ready for prime time yet. Therefore, we had to go back to a deployment of bare metal install. We are still waiting and trying to figure out how we can do the composable infrastructure."

"Technical support for this solution has a very good initial response; however, escalation takes time, and most of the time the first level of support cannot solve your case."

"The possibility of using storage directly in the frame in order to have bigger storage directly there, and not having an attached storage like SAN or NAS. That would be helpful."

"When templates are created, there are some steps where you need to reboot the machines. Being in production, this is not a good idea. For example, if you reconfigure the network, you should not have to reboot the machine. You should just apply the new template and that's it."

"They have not improved their product since it was purchased."

"The setup was a bit complex."

"Over the two years of using HPE Synergy, we have found some hardware failures that are frequent in the SOP models, CNA cards, and converged network adapters. These failures are frequently happening for a lot of the customers."

More HPE Synergy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a very expensive one-time cost with no licensing fees."

"The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive."

"In our whole environment, the cost is in the millions. On this particular chassis, the annual cost is 12 blades times approximately $40,000."

"The cost is high and that is a drawback for some customers."

"The solution has reduced our IT infrastructure costs by 50 percent."

"We don't have to pay for Synergy because it's part of our plan."

"Nutanix was really hard to implement, and it was very pricey compared to what we get from Synergy."

"There is a perpetual license given when you purchase HPE Synergy."

"Synergy has lowered our total cost of ownership significantly. I would say ballpark around 25 percent, maybe more."

"For temporal use, when you throw on the fact that you're essentially doubling your capacity, right there you could claim a 50 percent TCO reduction."

More HPE Synergy pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Superdome X?

I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Superdome X?

The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Superdome X?

See all answers

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Synergy?

As far as the prices are concerned, rack mount solutions are less expensive than HPE Synergy prices; however, HPE Synergy prices are higher but justify themselves as the solution accommodates all t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Synergy?

In my opinion, for future improvements in HPE Synergy, there should be better management of power consumption complexity as well as an increase in the number of servers that can fit in a single Syn...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 24% of the time

Lenovo Flex System vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Integrity vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 10% of the time

HPE NonStop vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 9% of the time

Fujitsu CX1000 vs HPE Superdome X

Compared 7% of the time

More HPE Superdome X Competitors

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Synergy

Compared 21% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Synergy

Compared 19% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE Synergy

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs HPE Synergy

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE Synergy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

January 2026

Download HPE Superdome X product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Synergy

January 2026

Download HPE Synergy product report

Also Known As

HP Integrity Superdome, HP Superdome X

No data available

Overview

HPE Superdome X is an HPE server that represents a new category of x86 modular, mission-critical systems to consolidate all tiers of critical applications on a common platform. Engineered with trusted Superdome 2 reliability, the HPE Superdome X includes a modular, bladed design, and shares HPE BladeSystem efficiencies including a common server management framework, supported from x86 to Superdome 2. With breakthrough innovations such as the fault-tolerant Crossbar Fabric and Error Analysis Engine coupled with hard partitioning capabilities, Superdome X sets the standard for mission-critical x86 computing.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Pella

HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United

Buyer's Guide

HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

December 2025

Free Report: HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Superdome X vs. HPE Synergy report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.