HPE System Management Homepage vs Zabbix comparison

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"Overall as a management tool to see a complete overview of the entire HP hardware infrastructure, this is an excellent tool."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"I think it's stable and flexible, and it's secure too."

"It is a smart system management tool that enables businesses to manage their operations more effectively."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."

"One of the real benefits is the API; you can do anything with an API, it makes life much easier."

"The flexible licensing model is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. It really allows for great flexibility for companies."

"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."

"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."

"The overall functionality of Zabbix is very good. The monitoring of bank applications that Zabbix provides is great. The information is displayed on a dashboard that is easily viewed."

"The performance and bandwidth are valuable features."

"There is less computing power needed for scaling."

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful."

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"I really do not like this solution, almost all of its features are awful."

"For us, the initial setup was complex."

"Its UI needs to be improved a little bit more so that an end-user is also able to handle it. I can handle it, but others should also be able to handle it in a better way. It becomes complex when we are growing and need to add proxies. We need more scalability features and documentation for different use cases. A lot of articles are available, but they need to be in proper documentation. For example, when you have thousands of servers that have to be monitored in different regions of the world, there should be some kind of documentation to describe how you can create proxies and add them. Sometimes, when you are using the database, it can get overloaded. When the network is growing, the number of transactions becomes very high, and the database gets overloaded. There should be information about how to reduce the load on the MySQL database, which is what Zabbix is using. The market is growing a lot, and it should be enhanced for a lot more things. We are currently bringing enhancements at our end for different use cases. For example, when dockerization is going on, how can we check the logs inside the Dockers. We should also be able to monitor and check the number of logins and add features such as SSO login and two-factor authentication as a protocol. These are the security features and concerns that we have to deal with. Currently, we are developing modules to add features to Zabbix, but they should also work on these features."

"I would like to see a more flexible mobile client, and better HA out of the box."

"In the next release, I'm hoping for features targeted towards larger users with more customizable options. Despite this, I think pre-canned reports that can be used straight out of the box would be beneficial rather than having to configure each report individually. Additionally, a deeper dive into software configurations on the machines would be useful, although I understand there may be challenges in implementing this due to scripting requirements. More documentation would also be appreciated."

"Cloud monitoring can be a bit easier, and the Zabbix dashboard can be developed a little bit more."

"The server monitoring could be better."

"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines."

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

"The price of this product is fair."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"Zabbix and Grafana are both open source products, we only needed to go to their website and download the application and we began to use them. The solutions are free."

"We are using the free, open-source version."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"It is open source. If you want to have a subscription or official support, you can pay for it. They have different plans, which are not that expensive. The plans are based on per monitoring server, not per monitored equipment. So, it is not at all expensive, and you can also live without the support if you want a cheaper option."

"I use the tool's free version."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"There are no licenses."

"I was using the free, Community Edition."