HPE System Management Homepage vs Zabbix comparison

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"There is less computing power needed for scaling."

"The best feature is that Zabbix can report everything, and everything in Zabbix is free."

"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."

"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."

"The solution allows you to configure and customize how you want to collect information from servers or other systems."

"The product is very stable."

"Zabbix is a cost-effective solution. We're a small organization with a few dozen devices to monitor, and it was available for free. We can see what we need. We haven't done an in-depth analysis on it, but we're currently okay with the product."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the ease with which we can set it up at customer sites with our custom Zabbix proxy and tools."

"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"When using this solution in enterprise monitoring, you are able to see that there are some issues with equipment that could be causing a problem. Sometimes you want to make a root command that you do not want to be executed automatically. What we have tried to do is open an SSH session directly from the solution's interface but it is not possible."

"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."

"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."

"There are areas of improvement. The database grows really fast. So, when you install Zabbix, you have to deal with some issues, like the database. We become pretty big very fast."

"Zabbix is not easy to configure, and upgrading is also an issue."

"Its UI needs to be improved a little bit more so that an end-user is also able to handle it. I can handle it, but others should also be able to handle it in a better way. It becomes complex when we are growing and need to add proxies. We need more scalability features and documentation for different use cases. A lot of articles are available, but they need to be in proper documentation. For example, when you have thousands of servers that have to be monitored in different regions of the world, there should be some kind of documentation to describe how you can create proxies and add them. Sometimes, when you are using the database, it can get overloaded. When the network is growing, the number of transactions becomes very high, and the database gets overloaded. There should be information about how to reduce the load on the MySQL database, which is what Zabbix is using. The market is growing a lot, and it should be enhanced for a lot more things. We are currently bringing enhancements at our end for different use cases. For example, when dockerization is going on, how can we check the logs inside the Dockers. We should also be able to monitor and check the number of logins and add features such as SSO login and two-factor authentication as a protocol. These are the security features and concerns that we have to deal with. Currently, we are developing modules to add features to Zabbix, but they should also work on these features."

"The stability could be better."

"The price of this product is fair."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"For pricing, it's free. We don't pay anything for it. They open-source the code, and people pay for support."

"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

"There is a license required for this solution and we pay annually for our license."

"Zabbix is an open-source tool, and it's free to use."

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"If you have 20,000 hosts, the support costs around €95,000 for a year."