Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE System Management Homepage vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Microsoft are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.3% mindshare in SM, compared to Microsoft’s 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
HPE System Management Homepage
Read 8 HPE System Management Homepage reviews
  • 630 Views
  • 533 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 80 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 3,078 Views
  • 2,330 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 20, 2024

Microsoft Configuration Manager and HPE System Management Homepage are both widely used for enterprise IT management, but they have different strengths and weaknesses. Microsoft Configuration Manager has the upper hand in terms of breadth of features and customer service quality, while HPE System Management Homepage offers simpler deployment and is initially more budget-friendly.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager is highly valued for its scalability, rich feature set, and seamless integration with other Microsoft products. Users appreciate its advanced software update capabilities and comprehensive hardware and software inventory functions. HPE System Management Homepage is praised for its centralized monitoring and management features, especially in heterogeneous environments. However, HPE's feature set isn't as extensive as Microsoft's when it comes to endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager users frequently mention the need for a more modern, intuitive setup process and better automation capabilities. HPE System Management Homepage users express the need for improved reporting functionalities and more simplified navigation. While both products have specific areas that need enhancement, Microsoft's areas seem to be more about usability, whereas HPE's are more about enhancement of existing features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager's deployment model is perceived as somewhat complex but robust, with strong support options available. Customers find the initial setup challenging but are satisfied with the efficient customer service. HPE System Management Homepage offers a more straightforward deployment and good integration support, but users express mixed feelings about the responsiveness of customer service. Microsoft Configuration Manager has a slight edge in customer service quality but trails HPE in deployment simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: Users report that Microsoft Configuration Manager has a higher initial setup cost but delivers a good return on investment due to its comprehensive capabilities and efficiency gains. HPE System Management Homepage is seen as more budget-friendly initially, but users feel the ROI is slightly lower due to its narrower feature set. Despite Microsoft Configuration Manager being pricier, its extensive features make it worth the investment for many enterprises.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE System Management Homepage
Ranking in Server Monitoring
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Server Monitoring
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (3rd), Patch Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 3.3%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 9.5%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

JE
Feb 14, 2024
Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part
The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
Read full review
Sachin Vinay - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 12, 2022
We can specialize the policies related to each device group which ensures that each group has access to the applications they need for their work and non-work hours
I give the solution a nine out of ten. Maintenance is required for some client requests because a few of our cases involve clients reporting issues with their applications. We need to maintain their laptops because they usually run into issues while running other applications. However, in the case of personal computers, there is no problem. We can maintain them with only 20% of the typical maintenance requirements. I would recommend that everyone try out the Endpoint Manager solution from Microsoft. It is a great product because it integrates well with Microsoft products, which most organizations use. This reduces the number of integration and troubleshooting problems. Even if Microsoft products are not used in an organization, I still recommend this product. Other solutions are available but there may be some integration and troubleshooting problems.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a good product and I recommend it."
"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."
"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."
"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."
"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is very scalable."
"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."
"The tool's most valuable features include security updates and patch management, which are critical functions for maintaining security. The automated software distribution and the ability to manage deployments are also highly useful. Enforcing compliance with set policies on systems is another key functionality we leverage."
"Software deployment and WSUS are most valuable."
"This solution captures all the devices in our infrastructure."
"The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging."
"Technical support is very helpful and very responsive."
"There have to be made some improvement in WSUS and control in other non-Microsoft products updates."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
 

Cons

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."
"I think that support integration could be improved."
"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."
"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."
"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."
"Their compliance reporting is not accurate, and they admitted it on the phone when we had a call with them. We were trying to understand why their numbers didn't match on our compliance reports. It is not accurate and you cannot depend on the compliance reports. The numbers just don't match, and we can't figure out why. We called Microsoft and they said, "Yeah, that's a known issue." But there is no word that they're working on it."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could improve the integration."
"In terms of scalability, I believe there's room for improvement. While SCCM is capable of handling our current needs effectively, scalability could be enhanced to accommodate future growth and larger deployments."
"The setup was complex and I faced a lot of problems initially because I was new to the solution."
"The solution should be more compatible with different versions of Linux."
"Based on my experience with SCCM 2016, the main, big issue is not having a good user-friendly environment. It needs much better GUI."
"With Microsoft Premier Support, you get what you pay for. There's Third Tier Support that you pay for. If you pay for that, you get excellent support, and if you don't pay for that, then you get the less experienced staff."
"Microsoft should extend support for additional platforms."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is fair."
"The license was included when we purchased the server."
"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."
"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."
"Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing."
"Presently, I am using a free trial version."
"The solution is expensive. Microsoft Configuration Manager would likely be considered high-priced for small businesses because they may not fully utilize all of its features and capabilities."
"The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive."
"The price model is different for every client."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"For enterprises, there is an annual license required to use this solution. The price of the solution could be cheaper. However, this is mostly because of the exchange rate from the dollar to the Nigerian currency."
"Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE System Management?
The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?
My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HPE System Management?
The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage Logo
Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage
Compared 100% of the time
More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 7% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 6% of the time
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
October 2024
HPE System Management Homepage reportDownload HPE System Management Homepage product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
October 2024
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
 

Also Known As

System Management, Operations Center, HP System Management
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
 

Learn More

Video not available
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Microsoft
 

Overview

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

 

Sample Customers

Infotec
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Buyer's Guide
HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
October 2024
Free Report: HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.