HPE System Management Homepage vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Microsoft are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.9% mindshare in SM, compared to Microsoft’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

HPE System Management Homepage

Read 8 HPE System Management Homepage reviews

570 Views
470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 81 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

2,467 Views
1,942 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

HPE System Management Homepage

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager and HPE System Management Homepage are leading solutions in enterprise IT management. Microsoft Configuration Manager holds an advantage with its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, especially for Microsoft-centric environments.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers robust application deployment, powerful patch management, and comprehensive reporting features. Its integration with Microsoft Azure and Intune further enhances system management and security. HPE System Management Homepage provides efficient system monitoring, a straightforward interface, and reliable remote management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could improve by enhancing PowerShell integration, updating non-Microsoft products, and optimizing compliance reporting. Users wish for a more intuitive platform with better Linux patch support. HPE System Management Homepage would benefit from increased processing capacity and faster deployment speeds, with improved support for non-Windows platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers flexible deployment options, supporting both hybrid and cloud environments, with extensive online resources. HPE System Management Homepage is mainly on-premises, providing well-received support and good customer feedback on service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager is considered expensive with complex licensing but offers good ROI through its extensive features and strategic IT automation. HPE's pricing is seen as fair, appealing to those seeking long-term predictability, although it could improve in processing and deployment efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE System Management Homepage

Ranking in Server Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (3rd), Patch Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 1.9%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 6.6%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Juan Esteban

Consultant at Freelance

Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part

The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

MikeNelson2

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

Deployment recovery works well but requires configuration improvements

While I do not use the product frequently, many issues were due to configuration rather than the product itself. I cannot give an exact recommendation as it is not my area of responsibility. The team that uses it finds it adequate. It is presently good enough for us not to investigate other options. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."

"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well."

"Software deployment and WSUS are most valuable."

"The product is very stable compared to older versions."

"Valuable features include configurations enforcement, compliance data gathering, and deployment of a standardized OS."

"I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."

"The solution is stable."

"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

Cons

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."

"Microsoft should extend support for additional platforms."

"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."

"Some of the capabilities aren't fully developed yet. It's an ongoing work in progress. I think they are making some steps in the right direction as far as managing workstations centrally, like Intune."

"Management of Linux devices could be improved."

"We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users."

"The solution does not support remote devices so the CMG is still required."

"There's no way to say, "I want this maintenance window to be on the second Tuesday of the month." It's strict. This window is this and that's it. You can't fluctuate."

"I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

"The price of this product is fair."

"The price of SCCM depends on the size of the organization. The price is competitive."

"The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive."

"Its licensing is quite complicated because we are getting the license not only for SCCM but for the full Microsoft package. We don't need to pay for a separate license. We need to have one license that includes everything we need, such as Windows, Microsoft 365, SCCM, encryption, and so on. So, we don't have a specific price for it. Perhaps, it is good that it includes the full suite of licensing of Microsoft. It is expensive, but we are getting a lot of features."

"Presently, I am using a free trial version."

"The license price could be reduced for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager They should make the price more affordable for smaller companies, most companies would be able to use the solution if it was priced better. There are more people on this cloud because you don't have to have either a server room or an on-premise server. You can have one IT person handle this without any local infrastructure."

"We have a support license from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager and the overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free."

"We have to pay for a license."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE System Management?

The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?

My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE System Management?

The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 89% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 11% of the time

More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 8% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

February 2025

Download HPE System Management Homepage product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

March 2025

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Also Known As

HP System Management

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )

Overview

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Infotec

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Buyer's Guide

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

March 2025

Free Report: HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.