Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE System Management Homepage vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Microsoft are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.2% mindshare in SM, compared to Microsoft’s 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
HPE System Management Homepage
Read 8 HPE System Management Homepage reviews
  • 728 Views
  • 619 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 80 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 3,418 Views
  • 2,625 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 20, 2024

Microsoft Configuration Manager and HPE System Management Homepage are both widely used for enterprise IT management, but they have different strengths and weaknesses. Microsoft Configuration Manager has the upper hand in terms of breadth of features and customer service quality, while HPE System Management Homepage offers simpler deployment and is initially more budget-friendly.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager is highly valued for its scalability, rich feature set, and seamless integration with other Microsoft products. Users appreciate its advanced software update capabilities and comprehensive hardware and software inventory functions. HPE System Management Homepage is praised for its centralized monitoring and management features, especially in heterogeneous environments. However, HPE's feature set isn't as extensive as Microsoft's when it comes to endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager users frequently mention the need for a more modern, intuitive setup process and better automation capabilities. HPE System Management Homepage users express the need for improved reporting functionalities and more simplified navigation. While both products have specific areas that need enhancement, Microsoft's areas seem to be more about usability, whereas HPE's are more about enhancement of existing features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager's deployment model is perceived as somewhat complex but robust, with strong support options available. Customers find the initial setup challenging but are satisfied with the efficient customer service. HPE System Management Homepage offers a more straightforward deployment and good integration support, but users express mixed feelings about the responsiveness of customer service. Microsoft Configuration Manager has a slight edge in customer service quality but trails HPE in deployment simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: Users report that Microsoft Configuration Manager has a higher initial setup cost but delivers a good return on investment due to its comprehensive capabilities and efficiency gains. HPE System Management Homepage is seen as more budget-friendly initially, but users feel the ROI is slightly lower due to its narrower feature set. Despite Microsoft Configuration Manager being pricier, its extensive features make it worth the investment for many enterprises.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: July 2024).
Buyer's Guide
HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
July 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 800,688 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE System Management Homepage
Ranking in Server Monitoring
20th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Server Monitoring
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (3rd), Patch Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 3.2%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 9.3%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

JE
Feb 14, 2024
Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part
The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
Read full review
PC
Jan 31, 2023
An integrated solution for managing all of your devices with a useful reporting feature
We use Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager for application deployment and patching. We run the gamut, and we use it for quite a bit To do what we are doing with the configurations manager manually would be impossible. We have over 100,000 systems, and it simplifies a lot of what we are…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."
"This is a good product and I recommend it."
"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."
"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."
"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."
"The tool's most valuable features are easy patch management and software deployment."
"The dashboards have information about our assets."
"The ability to make collections and deploy to them has been great."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur."
"The cloud account management is a valuable feature."
"One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined process has significantly improved our software distribution workflows."
"SCCM is a stable solution."
"Technical support was helpful and responsive."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
 

Cons

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."
"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."
"I think that support integration could be improved."
"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."
"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."
"The configuration of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could be improved, it is a bit complicated."
"There is no asset management package included."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
"Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell."
"This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could improve the integration."
"In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."
"The license was included when we purchased the server."
"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."
"The price of this product is fair."
"The solution operates on a licensing model that can be expensive."
"Presently, I am using a free trial version."
"The price model is different for every client."
"Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works."
"We have a support license from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager and the overall price of the solution is reasonable."
"I would rate the cost as eight out of ten."
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
"There is an annual license needed to use the solution."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Healthcare Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE System Management?
The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?
My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HPE System Management?
The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage Logo
Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage
Compared 93% of the time
Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage Logo
Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage
Compared 7% of the time
More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 12% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 7% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 6% of the time
Quest KACE Systems Management vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Quest KACE Systems Management vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
August 2024
HPE System Management Homepage reportDownload HPE System Management Homepage product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
August 2024
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
 

Also Known As

System Management, Operations Center, HP System Management
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
 

Learn More

Video not available
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Microsoft
 

Overview

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

 

Sample Customers

Infotec
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Buyer's Guide
HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
July 2024
Free Report: HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.