HPE System Management Homepage vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Microsoft are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.7% mindshare in SM, compared to Microsoft’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

HPE System Management Homepage

Read 8 HPE System Management Homepage reviews

578 Views
566 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 82 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

11,776 Views
1,884 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

HPE System Management Homepage

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager and HPE System Management Homepage are competitors in the system management domain. While Microsoft Configuration Manager holds a slight edge due to its software management capabilities, HPE excels in hardware monitoring.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager emphasizes OS deployment, patch management, and compliance reporting. Its centralized console and integration with WSUS and mobile management are noteworthy. Conversely, HPE System Management Homepage concentrates on hardware monitoring and server management, delivering impressive system health insights.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager needs enhanced Linux support, reduced resource consumption, and more seamless integration with non-Microsoft products. HPE System Management Homepage requires improved processing capability, faster deployment, and better integration with varied server environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager supports broad deployment options, including on-premises, hybrid, and cloud, but it can be resource-intensive. HPE System Management Homepage offers simpler deployment, primarily in on-premises or hybrid settings. Both provide good documentation, though Microsoft's support effectiveness varies based on issue complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager’s robust features come with high costs and complex licensing, potentially limiting smaller enterprises despite favorable ROI. HPE's more affordable licensing model, with permanent licenses after initial fees, offers a cost-effective solution for those focusing on physical hardware management.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE System Management Homepage

Ranking in Server Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (4th), Patch Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 1.7%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 5.3%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Juan Esteban

Consultant at Freelance

Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part

The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

MikeNelson2

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

Deployment recovery works well but requires configuration improvements

While I do not use the product frequently, many issues were due to configuration rather than the product itself. I cannot give an exact recommendation as it is not my area of responsibility. The team that uses it finds it adequate. It is presently good enough for us not to investigate other options. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."

"There have to be made some improvement in WSUS and control in other non-Microsoft products updates."

"Technical support was helpful and responsive."

"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."

"It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer."

"The technical support is good."

"It works well for the endpoints for the customer I'm consulting. It has a bunch of knobs, and you can tune it to do lots of things."

"SCCM does everything from A to Z for a Windows operating system."

"The most valuable feature of SCCM is the application distribution."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

Cons

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."

"There is no asset management package included."

"Based on my experience with SCCM 2016, the main, big issue is not having a good user-friendly environment. It needs much better GUI."

"Built in PowerShell cmdlets would be a nice feature because managing clients remotely can be a pain without knowing the WMI calls to run."

"The assets have reached their end-of-life, and patching them is a complex and laborious task. It would be highly advantageous if there were an integrated solution that provided distinct options for each end-of-life asset, streamlining the process and facilitating comprehension."

"The time the solution takes for updating systems could be quicker. For example, the system information status is not updating as it should. Additionally, the database synchronization querying is slow and could be improved."

"A lot of experience is needed in terms of troubleshooting, as this is one of the most difficult tasks in MECM. We were seven people in a group and I was the only one that had the patience to do the troubleshooting at times."

"The solution does not support remote devices so the CMG is still required."

"Management of Linux devices could be improved."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is fair."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

"Its licensing is quite complicated because we are getting the license not only for SCCM but for the full Microsoft package. We don't need to pay for a separate license. We need to have one license that includes everything we need, such as Windows, Microsoft 365, SCCM, encryption, and so on. So, we don't have a specific price for it. Perhaps, it is good that it includes the full suite of licensing of Microsoft. It is expensive, but we are getting a lot of features."

"I would rate the cost as eight out of ten."

"The price of SCCM depends on the size of the organization. The price is competitive."

"Microsoft provides a steep price for their enterprise products, but they offer very competitive pricing for their legacy customers."

"Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing."

"The price is competitive and reasonable."

"The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive."

"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Real Estate/Law Firm

11%

Retailer

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE System Management?

The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?

My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE System Management?

The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 77% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 14% of the time

More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 8% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

July 2025

Download HPE System Management Homepage product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

June 2025

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Also Known As

HP System Management

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )

Overview

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Infotec

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Buyer's Guide

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

July 2025

Free Report: HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE System Management Homepage vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.