Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hugging Face vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.7
Improve Hugging Face by enhancing search, security, documentation, cloud data, collaboration, deployment customization, and model details.
Sentiment score
4.7
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio requires better integration, enhanced features, cost clarity, improved security, and more user-friendly resources.
In future updates, I would appreciate improvements in integration and more AI features.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Hugging Face is seen as versatile and scalable, though some question its production readiness and focus on knowledge scaling.
Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is praised for its scalable cloud-based platform, efficiently supporting varying user sizes and tasks.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.3
Hugging Face provides flexible pricing models with open-source options but cloud deployment may incur additional costs.
Sentiment score
5.4
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio pricing varies with options from free to enterprise, affecting cost-effectiveness based on usage.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Hugging Face is rated as stable and reliable, with minor issues like rate-limited APIs noted by some users.
Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is stable and reliable, with occasional data-related hiccups and security environment concerns.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Hugging Face provides open-source AI tools, rich documentation, and an easy interface for efficient exploration and model comparison.
Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers a user-friendly, scalable platform with drag-and-drop, no-code development, and robust data integration.
Machine Learning Studio is easy to use, with a significant feature being the drag and drop interface that enhances workflow without any complaints.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio provides varying support with strengths in consultancy and documentation, though first-line response delays exist.
 

Categories and Ranking

Hugging Face
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Machine Lea...
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the AI Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hugging Face is 7.9%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is 12.1%, down from 17.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

AshishKumar11 - PeerSpot reviewer
Open-sourced, reliable, and enables organizations to finetune data for business requirements
Hugging Face is a website that provides various open-source models. We use them to finetune models for our business. It is just like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT has paid sources. If we have to call an API, we must pay for it. However, Hugging Face has various open-source models like Llama 2 and Llama 3…
Klaus Lozie - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good integration and used for data labeling
Lately, we have had some issues with the solution regarding labeling jobs. We can create a label job, but we still have to use the Azure Machine Learning REST APIs, which are not yet supported in the Python SDK version 2. Microsoft has a lot of documentation, but you can do it using the CLI, UI, or Python SDK version 2. You can have 100 ways of working, while I would like to have one way of working. It's very difficult to know what is best, according to Microsoft.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hugging Face?
My preferred aspects are natural language processing and question-answering.
What needs improvement with Hugging Face?
Hugging Face could improve by implementing a search engine or chat bot feature similar to ChatGPT. This would aid developers in easily finding how to fine-tune models with specific data or get mode...
What is your primary use case for Hugging Face?
I use Hugging Face primarily to work with open LLM models. I recently started using the open LOM models and also use embedding models. I use these models to train custom data and monitor our deskto...
Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?
The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure Machine Learning, MS Azure Machine Learning Studio
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Schneider Electric, BP
Find out what your peers are saying about Hugging Face vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.