Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

IBM Cloud Identity Service and IBM Security Verify Access are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. IBM Cloud Identity Service is ranked #30, while IBM Security Verify Access is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM Cloud Identity Service holds a 0.4% mindshare in IAMS, compared to IBM Security Verify Access’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM Cloud Identity Service users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM Security Verify Access users who would recommend it.
IBM Cloud Identity Service
Read 3 IBM Cloud Identity Service reviews
  • 215 Views
  • 136 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IBM Security Verify Access
Read 7 IBM Security Verify Access reviews
  • 783 Views
  • 519 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

IBM Cloud Identity Service and IBM Security Verify Access compete in identity and access management. IBM Security Verify Access offers advanced security features and flexibility, appealing to organizations seeking robust access control, while IBM Cloud Identity Service offers competitive pricing and support.

Features: IBM Cloud Identity Service provides seamless integration with cloud environments, straightforward identity management, and a focus on user convenience. IBM Security Verify Access offers risk-based access control, multifactor authentication, and prioritizes enterprise-level security and compliance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Identity Service is known for quick cloud-based deployment and accessible customer support, simplifying onboarding and troubleshooting. IBM Security Verify Access offers customizable on-premises deployments, requiring more setup time and expertise but is complemented by robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Cloud Identity Service is cost-effective with a lower upfront setup cost, delivering satisfactory ROI through cloud management. IBM Security Verify Access has higher initial costs but offers superior security capabilities and long-term value suitable for organizations prioritizing high-grade security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Identity Service vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Identity Service vs. IBM Security Verify Access
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Identity Service
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
30th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Security Verify Access
Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
18th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th), Identity Management (IM) (24th), Access Management (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Identity Service is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 1.8%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

AS
All of its features are valuable but the support needs improvement
It is multiple identity and access management, so all of the applications are valuable. It's also part of the automated process The support needs improvement.  I have been using IBM Cloud Identity Service for the last five years.  It is stable.  It is scalable.  We have 5,000 users using this…
Read full review
Jared Ochieng - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords
The authentication process with IBM Security Verify Access is good and is considered one of the best identity and access management solutions. It helps with multi-factor authentication. It offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords, enhancing security. It also includes features like password vaults and single sign-on, streamlining the access process for remote and local users across different solutions. The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options. The policy control feature allows you to set authentication measures and policies for your organization's identity governance. This feature helps create standardized policies and organize them into groups based on departments or specific needs. It simplifies access management for both administrators and users. IBM Security Verify Access can be integrated with almost any solution using APIs. The time required for integration depends on whether the solution is out of the box or custom. Out-of-the-box solutions can be integrated quickly, typically within a few days or hours, while custom solutions may require additional steps and take longer to integrate.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of IBM Cloud Identity Service is that it delivers integrations with the commercial SaaS software that's available."
"It is multiple identity and access management, so all of the applications are valuable. It's also part of the automated process."
"It is stable. We can automate many of our daily operations with it, and we don't have to manage many things manually."
"Its stability and UI are most valuable."
"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."
"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."
"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."
"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."
"It's a good solution for identification and access management."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."
 

Cons

"Everything can be more stable and secure. There could also be more account features. I would like to be able to do more things through it to manage users' accounts."
"The initial setup is complex, it's not straightforward. It takes months because it's not straightforward."
"IBM Cloud Identity Service is going in the right direction with the product. They need to keep building out the integrations and having the library is very critical."
"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."
"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."
"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."
"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."
"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."
"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."
"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive for non-enterprise companies. IBM's always going to be a little more expensive, you're going to be paying a premium. However, depending on the organization's needs, there's probably a benefit there to do even with the price being the way it is."
"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."
"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."
"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Insurance Company
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?
The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?
The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 25% of the time
Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 9% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access
Compared 9% of the time
More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
January 2025
IBM Cloud Identity Service reportDownload IBM Cloud Identity Service product report
Buyer's Guide
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
January 2025
IBM Security Verify Access reportDownload IBM Security Verify Access product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM
 

Overview

Whether your applications are custom, your business processes complex, or you're looking for world-class professional services and project management to coordinate each step of your project, IBM Cloud Identity Service is uniquely suited to serve organizations with out-of-the box challenges.

IBM Cloud Identity Service can be designed to help with the full lifecycle of implementation and operations, including discovery, planning, project management, integration engineering and more – expertly delivered by IBM's global staff of identity professionals.

IBM

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Baxter Healthcare, 
POST Luxembourg
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Identity Service vs. IBM Security Verify Access
January 2025
Free Report: IBM Cloud Identity Service vs. IBM Security Verify Access
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Identity Service vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Cloud Identity Service vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.