IBM Security Verify Access vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

IBM and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Ping Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 2.5% mindshare in SSO, compared to Ping Identity’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

2,277 Views
979 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

6,348 Views
2,666 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and IBM Security Verify Access are leading solutions in the identity and access management space. User reviews indicate that IBM provides better policy enforcement and security measures.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers seamless integration capabilities, advanced authentication mechanisms, and versatile deployment options. IBM Security Verify Access provides comprehensive policy enforcement, robust security protocols, and flexible access controls.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Ping Identity Platform improve its reporting functionalities, administration process, and user interface. IBM Security Verify Access needs improvements in simplified deployment, better documentation, and user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform is known for its straightforward deployment model but lacks responsive customer service. IBM Security Verify Access has complex deployment but offers effective customer support when needed.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform has a higher initial setup cost but offers competitive ROI due to its efficiency and feature set. IBM Security Verify Access is relatively cost-effective to set up and delivers satisfactory ROI driven by its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Verify Access vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,880 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

15th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

17th

Ranking in Access Management

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (17th)

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

4th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

6th

Ranking in Access Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 5.6%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	5.6%
IBM Security Verify Access	2.5%
Other	91.9%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

"I like PingFederate."

"The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering."

"It's pretty stable as a product."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."

"It is a very stable solution."

"It offers robust features and customization options that justify the cost."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product."

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

"For external customers, they do have challenges, although there are solutions for that available, as well."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"Sometimes, there are issues with its stability."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"The product is costly."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?

We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automatio...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingFederate?

PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingFederate?

It requires some expertise to set up and manage. Also, having dedicated support is helpful. It's not something anyone can just set up and run without assistance – ideally, a team using PingFederate...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingFederate?

We use PingFederate to provide SSO (Single Sign-On) solutions to enterprise applications. We support protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language), OAuth, and OpenID Connect. For example...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 6% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access

March 2026

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

POST Luxembourg

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Ping Identity Platform

April 2026

Free Report: IBM Security Verify Access vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Verify Access vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Security Verify Access vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.