Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Rhapsody vs OpenText ALM Octane comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
IBM Rhapsody's support is valued but faces delays; users suggest better online resources alongside local vendor reliance.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
IBM Engineering Rhapsody needs better reporting, user interfaces, tutorials, customization, integration, stability, and Git for enhanced user experience.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Engineering Rhapsody is scalable for various team sizes, though potential issues may arise with larger user numbers and integration.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
3.2
IBM Engineering Rhapsody is costly, but users value its features and maintain long-term use despite the price.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
IBM Engineering Rhapsody is generally stable, but experiences vary, with some users reporting occasional bugs and performance issues.
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText ALM Octane is stable and reliable, frequently updated, with minor deployment issues quickly resolved, highly rated by users.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
IBM Engineering Rhapsody enhances planning with Scrum, Git integration, compliance, and cost-effective collaboration via a customizable, cloud-based platform.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Rhapsody
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
13th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText ALM Octane
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Rhapsody is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ALM Octane is 6.3%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Harold Pogue - PeerSpot reviewer
A complex deployment that is not stable, but is cloud-based
The team of 15 to 20 software engineers uses IBM Rational ALM and Jira for testing. They coupled different online packages together because the Duration Enterprise was impossible to use IBM Rational ALM did not help the organization and we ended up moving to another solution. The most valuable…
Raghunathan Govindarajapuram - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution used for test management that is perceived to be an outdated tool by its customers
The number of individuals participating in the deployment process varies. Our company provides testing services, employs 34,000 individuals, and many of our clients utilize Micro Focus ALM Octane. This implies that many people use this tool, after considering 34,000 end-users from our company's end who are using Micro Focus ALM Octane. For deployment, the number of required tech engineers depends on the size of the project. For installation, one or two people may suffice. However, for usage, there will be many others who need to use it. The tool itself does not require any maintenance. However, it may require customization based on the specific needs of each customer. Workflows may need to be customized to meet the unique requirements of each customer. It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ALM?
The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex. For business users with no experience in IT, it can be particularly challenging to understand the UI and create test cas...
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational ALM?
We use IBM Rational ALM as part of our overall application suite for our manufacturing company. It is used by our engineering team to capture requirements, perform testing, and manage defects. Spec...
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The tool's price is extremely high. When I was using Micro Focus, there were ten licenses, costing around 1,38,000, which was outrageous.
 

Also Known As

Rational ALM, MKS
Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst
Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Rhapsody vs. OpenText ALM Octane and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.