Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codebeamer vs OpenText ALM Octane comparison

PTC and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. PTC is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.4, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. PTC holds a 7.7% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of PTC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Codebeamer
Read 12 Codebeamer reviews
  • 3,524 Views
  • 2,892 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
OpenText ALM Octane
Read 40 OpenText ALM Octane reviews
  • 5,713 Views
  • 3,075 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Codebeamer and OpenText ALM Octane compete in the application lifecycle management space. Codebeamer appears to have the upper hand in terms of pricing and support, while OpenText ALM Octane excels in advanced project management functionalities for complex projects.

Features: Codebeamer offers effective third-party integrations, comprehensive requirements management, and robust traceability across its platform. OpenText ALM Octane is strong in agile project management, DevOps integration, and advanced analytics and reporting capabilities, suitable for complex, large-scale projects.

Room for Improvement: Codebeamer could enhance its analytics and reporting tools, improve its collaborative features further, and expand its agile project management functionalities. OpenText ALM Octane could boost its pricing model attractiveness, simplify its customization process for novice users, and improve its scalability and flexibility for different deployment models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM Octane offers cloud-based deployment for easy scalability and provides extensive training resources to boost customer service. Codebeamer supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, known for personalized support but may face slower deployment compared to OpenText ALM Octane.

Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer's cost-effective setup allows companies to begin without significant financial investment, improving ROI with efficient performance. In contrast, OpenText ALM Octane may require a higher initial investment, yet it potentially provides a superior ROI via its advanced feature set for managing complex projects.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. OpenText ALM Octane Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Codebeamer vs. OpenText ALM Octane
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Codebeamer's customer support is praised for transparency and speed, with users suggesting a hotline chat for improvement.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Codebeamer is scalable across platforms, rated favorably against competitors, effective but requires effort to adapt to features.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Codebeamer is praised for its reliability and stability, earning high ratings despite occasional minor glitches.
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText ALM Octane is stable and reliable, frequently updated, with minor deployment issues quickly resolved, highly rated by users.
 

Room For Improvement

Codebeamer requires enhanced features, usability, integration, international support, documentation, intuitive interface, and improved marketing and compatibility strategies.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users view Codebeamer pricing as competitive and aligned with industry standards, despite not being the cheapest option.
 

Valuable Features

Codebeamer excels in traceability, customization, and integrations, ideal for automotive and pharmaceuticals, replacing tools like IBM DOORS.
 

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText ALM Octane
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 7.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ALM Octane is 6.3%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Kandurwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement
In my current company, we previously used multiple tools for requirement management, test management, and tracking, such as Arvines, a hardware list for test management, and Jira for tracking purposes. However, these tools were part of a segregated environment, and management decided to upgrade them due to their outdated functionalities. Consequently, my team and I evaluated various tools for requirement management and chose CodeBeamer for its flexibility. We found it is more adaptable to our organization's needs and processes, making it a suitable choice for our migration efforts. During the evaluation process, we considered features compatibility with our business processes and flexibility to accommodate changes. This aspect was crucial to minimizing adjustment time and ensuring a smooth transition to the new tool.
Read full review
Raghunathan Govindarajapuram - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution used for test management that is perceived to be an outdated tool by its customers
The number of individuals participating in the deployment process varies. Our company provides testing services, employs 34,000 individuals, and many of our clients utilize Micro Focus ALM Octane. This implies that many people use this tool, after considering 34,000 end-users from our company's end who are using Micro Focus ALM Octane. For deployment, the number of required tech engineers depends on the size of the project. For installation, one or two people may suffice. However, for usage, there will be many others who need to use it. The tool itself does not require any maintenance. However, it may require customization based on the specific needs of each customer. Workflows may need to be customized to meet the unique requirements of each customer. It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
31%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?
The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?
As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?
Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup, which could be improved.
See all answers
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The tool's price is extremely high. When I was using Micro Focus, there were ten licenses, costing around 1,38,000, which was outrageous.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

PTC Integrity vs Codebeamer Logo
PTC Integrity vs Codebeamer
Compared 30% of the time
Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer Logo
Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer
Compared 22% of the time
Jira vs Codebeamer Logo
Jira vs Codebeamer
Compared 14% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer
Compared 13% of the time
Rally Software vs Codebeamer Logo
Rally Software vs Codebeamer
Compared 1% of the time
More Codebeamer Competitors
Jira vs OpenText ALM Octane Logo
Jira vs OpenText ALM Octane
Compared 51% of the time
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText ALM Octane Logo
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText ALM Octane
Compared 28% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM Octane Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM Octane
Compared 11% of the time
TFS vs OpenText ALM Octane Logo
TFS vs OpenText ALM Octane
Compared 2% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText ALM Octane Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText ALM Octane
Compared 2% of the time
More OpenText ALM Octane Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Codebeamer
December 2024
Codebeamer reportDownload Codebeamer product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM Octane
December 2024
OpenText ALM Octane reportDownload OpenText ALM Octane product report
 

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM
Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
 

Learn More

PTC
OpenText
 

Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.

ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.

 

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Buyer's Guide
Codebeamer vs. OpenText ALM Octane
December 2024
Free Report: Codebeamer vs. OpenText ALM Octane
Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. OpenText ALM Octane and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Codebeamer vs. OpenText ALM Octane report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.