IBM Event Streams vs IBM MQ comparison

IBM Event Streams and IBM MQ are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. IBM Event Streams is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM MQ is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM Event Streams holds a 1.4% mindshare in MQ, compared to IBM MQ’s 29.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM Event Streams users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM MQ users who would recommend it.

IBM Event Streams

Read 3 IBM Event Streams reviews

225 Views
174 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM MQ

Read 163 IBM MQ reviews

7,372 Views
4,873 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

IBM Event Streams

IBM MQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Event Streams and IBM MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Event Streams vs. IBM MQ Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Event Streams vs. IBM MQ

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Event Streams

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

163

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (1st), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of IBM Event Streams is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM MQ is 29.5%, up from 26.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Ismail El-Dahshan

Digital Transformation Expert at areebah

Efficiently calculates data flow and provides ease of integration

We seamlessly integrated IBM Event Streams with real data processes by establishing data consumers. The consumers act as end-users, initiating requests and receiving responses from the data provider. The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality. It provides an easy integration, particularly in creating a platform and facilitating interactions between subscribers and service providers. I rate it an eight out of ten.

Read full review

SelvaKumar4

System Analyst at Walmart

Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method

We find it scalable for internal applications, but not so much for external integrations. It should support a wider range of protocols, not just a few specific ones. Many other products have broader protocol support, and IBM MQ is lagging in that area. IBM MQ needs to improve the UI for quicker logging. Users should also have a lot more control over logging, with a dashboard-like interface. That's something they should definitely work on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability has been good."

"The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality."

"I'm an administrator, and what I like most is the interface, the security, and the storage."

"This solution has improved and influenced the communication between different applications, then standardized that communication."

"It is stable, reliable, and scalable."

"We like IBM MQ for our synchronous communications and transactional applications that require a lot of CPS."

"This product has good security."

"The system integration is good."

"IBM MQ deals mainly with the queuing mechanism. It passes the data and it publishes it. These two abilities are the most valuable features."

"It is very robust and very scalable."

"Reliability is the most valuable feature. MQ is used to support critical business applications."

More IBM MQ pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if they could help us explain why they, as in, the customers, should use the product and the overall benefits."

"The product's interface needs improvement."

"In the next release, I would like to see the GUI allow you to configure the security section."

"It could always be more stable and secure."

"It would be an advantage if they can include streaming in IBM MQ, similar to Kafka. Kafka is used mainly for streaming purposes. This feature is clearly lacking in IBM MQ. If they add this feature to IBM MQ, it will have an edge over other products."

"The issue is that they're using a very old clustering model."

"I'm not sure that current version has event-driven mechanism requests that people go for. I would like the latest version to come with both type of event mechanisms: an email server and a POP server. If that is not there, then that would be a great addition."

"The integration capabilities could be even easier."

"I believe the stability of the product has decreased since we began using it initially."

"I would like to see message duplication included."

"It would be nice if we could use the cluster facilities because we are doing active/passive configuration use."

More IBM MQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform is averagely priced."

"The pricing needs to be improved."

"IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly."

"99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years. IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best."

"IBM's licensing model seems more reasonable than some competitors. They charge based on usage, which is good."

"The price is high."

"The pricing seems good according to the functionality that the solution provides."

"I think IBM needs to look at its pricing. The prices of IBM products should be simple. The old way of pricing should now be moving on to the cloud to be pay as you go, a plan-based kind of pricing."

"Small-scale companies may not want to buy IBM MQ because of its high cost."

"It's super expensive, so ask them if they can consolidate some other licensing costs. But, IBM is IBM, so I guess we'll pay for it."

More IBM MQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

Hospitality Company

Financial Services Firm

38%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Event Streams?

The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Event Streams?

The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Event Streams?

The product's interface needs improvement. Additionally, there could be a management console to create and manage clusters.

See all answers

What is MQ software?

Hi As someone with 45+ years of experience in the Transaction and Message Processing world, I have seen many "MQ" solutions that have come into the market place. From my perspective, while each pro...

See all answers

What are the differences between Apache Kafka and IBM MQ?

Apache Kafka is open source and can be used for free. It has very good log management and has a way to store the data used for analytics. Apache Kafka is very good if you have a high number of user...

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Kafka vs IBM Event Streams

Compared 53% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs IBM Event Streams

Compared 47% of the time

More IBM Event Streams Competitors

ActiveMQ vs IBM MQ

Compared 39% of the time

Apache Kafka vs IBM MQ

Compared 13% of the time

PubSub+ Platform vs IBM MQ

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs IBM MQ

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM MQ

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM MQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

December 2024

Download IBM Event Streams product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM MQ

December 2024

Download IBM MQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

WebSphere MQ

Learn More

IBM

Overview

Built on open source Apache Kafka, IBM Event Streams is an event-streaming platform that helps you build smart applications that can react to events as they happen. IBM Event Streams is based on years of operational expertise IBM has gained from running Apache Kafka event streams for enterprises

IBM MQ is a middleware product used to send or exchange messages across multiple platforms, including applications, systems, files, and services via MQs (messaging queues). This solution helps simplify the creation of business applications, and also makes them easier to maintain. IBM MQ is security-rich, has high performance, and provides a universal messaging backbone with robust connectivity. In addition, it also integrates easily with existing IT assets by using an SOA (service oriented architecture).

IBM MQ can be deployed:

On-premises
In the cloud
Hybrid cloud

IBM MQ supports the following APIs:

MQI (Message Queue Interface)
REST
.NET
MQTT
JMS
IBM MQ Light

IBM MQ Features

Some of the most powerful IBM MQ features include:

High availability
Stability and scalability
Flexible deployment options
Uniform clusters
Automated and intelligent workload balancing
Broad language, API, and messaging protocol support
Administrative features that simplify messaging management
Open standards development tools
Simple management tools

IBM MQ Benefits

Some of the benefits of using IBM MQ include:

Multi-style messaging: IBM MQ supports simple multi-style messaging, making it easy to connect diverse systems with support for message queuing, transactions, and more.
Reduced risk: With IBM MQ you will never lose a message, and messages are never delivered more than once.
Cloud-native: Because IBM MQ has a minimal infrastructure, it is suitable to be cloud-native, and therefore has the capability to always remain on.
Available anywhere: Using IBM MQ, you have access to secure messaging anywhere, at any time.
Secure: IBM MQ makes sure to keep your data safe by using TLS secured communications, providing access identity management, message-level security, and more measures to protect your information.
Easy for application programmers: To use IBM MQ, application programmers do not need to have any knowledge of communications programming.
Technical support: IBM MQ has a large user community and also provides support 24/7 as needed.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by IBM MQ users who are currently using the solution.

PeerSpot user Sunil S., a manager at a financial services firm, explains that they never lose messages are never lost in transit, mentioning that he can store messages and forward them as required: "Whenever payments are happening, such as incoming payments to the bank, we need to notify the customer. With MQ we can actually do that asynchronously. We don't want to notify the customer for each and every payment but, rather, more like once a day. That kind of thing can be enabled with the help of MQ."

Another PeerSpot reviewer, Luis L. who is a solutions director at Thesys Technologies, says that IBM MQ is a valuable solution and is "A stable and reliable software that offers good integration between different systems."

The head of operations at a financial services firm notes that "I have found the solution to be very robust. It has a strong reputation, is easy to use, simple to configure in our enterprise software, and supports all the protocols that we use."

In addition, a Software Engineer at a financial services firm praises the security benefits of it and states that “it has the most security features I've seen in a communication solution. Security is the most important thing for our purposes."

Sample Customers

American Airlines, UBank, Bitly, Eurobits, Active International, Bison, Contextor, Constance Hotels, Resorts & Golf, Creval, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, FaceMe, FacePhi, Fitzsoft, Fuga Technologies, Guardio, Honeywell, Japanese airline, Jenzabar, KONE

Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation

Buyer's Guide

IBM Event Streams vs. IBM MQ

December 2024

Free Report: IBM Event Streams vs. IBM MQ

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Event Streams vs. IBM MQ and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Event Streams vs. IBM MQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.