Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs Oracle GoldenGate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Oracle GoldenGate offers high ROI by reducing manual effort, downtime, and aiding disaster recovery, despite its substantial cost.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
Customer service experiences with IBM InfoSphere Information Server vary, but technical support is generally praised for its promptness.
Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle GoldenGate's customer service is praised for priority issues but criticized for slow response times and variable support quality.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
IBM InfoSphere is flexible and scalable, though improvements in configuration and data handling are suggested by some.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Users praise IBM InfoSphere Information Server's stability, with minimal issues reported, notably occasional job locks due to internet speed.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

IBM InfoSphere needs better index handling, user-friendly features, enhanced cloud support, and improvements in technical support and performance.
Oracle GoldenGate requires enhancements in usability, monitoring, support, pricing, integration, scalability, documentation, configuration, and real-time replication capabilities.
 

Valuable Features

IBM InfoSphere is valued for integration, flexibility, performance, and efficient administration, handling data changes, and partitioned databases.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Information ...
Ranking in Data Integration
32nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Metadata Management (9th)
Oracle GoldenGate
Ranking in Data Integration
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Server is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle GoldenGate is 4.2%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

UmeshKumar1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability
IBM InfoSphere Information Server has multiple tools in that product suite. However, we mainly use it as an integration tool I have been using IBM InfoSphere Information Server for approximately five years. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable. IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be…
Vijay Manoharan - PeerSpot reviewer
Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation
The setup with the classic GoldenGate architecture was easy. Oracle has now moved to Microservices Architecture. It is a real pain. There are a lot of new things we have to learn. I rate the ease of setup of the classic architecture a seven out of ten. For Microservices, I rate the ease of setup a three out of ten. The deployment takes a couple of hours. We need one system administrator to deploy the tool. We need to maintain the tool. We are a team of four people. We need at least three people for maintenance. The time taken for maintenance depends on how big the environment is. We spend a lot of time on maintenance because our environment is big.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user99375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2014
Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard
As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Government
14%
Insurance Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required. In our company, we are presently in the process of doing a PoC phase since we have the solution cu...
What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking for transformation purposes.
What do you like most about Oracle GoldenGate?
The product is reliable for data integrity.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle GoldenGate?
The product is expensive. Due to the high cost, we are considering alternative solutions.
What needs improvement with Oracle GoldenGate?
The solution sometimes has issues with long transactions and replication delays. Its pricing needs improvement.
 

Also Known As

InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server
GoldenGate
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia
Japan Exchange Group, Daewoo E&C, Herbalife, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, Canon, Turk Telekom
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Oracle GoldenGate and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.