IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs Qlik Replicate comparison

IBM and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qlik is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1. IBM holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

Read 7 IBM InfoSphere Information Server reviews

1,128 Views
938 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Read 17 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,369 Views
3,654 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

Qlik Replicate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and IBM InfoSphere Information Server are in the data integration domain. Qlik Replicate may seem advantageous due to its pricing and support, while IBM InfoSphere impresses with its feature set.

Features: Qlik Replicate facilitates real-time data integration, offers ease of use, and ensures high data accuracy. IBM InfoSphere excels in data governance, data quality, and comprehensive integration, catering to complex enterprise requirements.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate could enhance its AI capabilities to meet more sophisticated data needs, expand its suite of connectors, and improve its data transformation features. IBM InfoSphere might focus on simplifying its deployment process, reducing initial costs, and enhancing user interface design for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate is noted for its simple deployment and accessible customer service, minimizing operational downtime. IBM InfoSphere, though featuring a complex setup due to extensive features, offers robust support to navigate deployment challenges effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate is cost-effective with low setup costs and rapid ROI due to quick deployment. IBM InfoSphere, despite its higher initial costs, promises significant ROI for large enterprises through enhanced data management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

Ranking in Data Integration

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (7th)

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Server is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

UmeshKumar1

Business Analyst Team Lead at Accenture

Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability

IBM InfoSphere Information Server has multiple tools in that product suite. However, we mainly use it as an integration tool I have been using IBM InfoSphere Information Server for approximately five years. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable. IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be…

Read full review

KrishnaBaddam

Presales Manager at Artha Solutions

Lightweight tool, ensures that data is replicated across different systems and simplify complex tasks such as defining relationships

Qlik Compose is something that will automate user's overall data modernization. Here data modernization includes data modeling, ETL jobs, etc. But the advantage is users can automate the overall process of data engineering and data modeling through Qlik Compose. I think that's useful when users are able to manage 60% of the workload automated. That will be very useful. That's fantastic. Replicate does not have a great AI capability. AI capabilities are present in Qlik Sense. Qlik Replicate is a very light tool. It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change. So, it basically integrates with the kernel of the operating system. The way it works is that these replicate tools will integrate with the kernel of the operating system, and they will access the redo log files of the database. The redo log should have access to all the files of the structure of the schema, too. So, using that technique, they redo all the data structures, create a similar structure, and replicate the structure in the target schema, table, and database. After that is done, it will start tracing the instances that are happening. For example, if data is inserted into the table, then an insert is fired on the statement on the table. So, that particular insert is captured. And based on that insert statement, it will pull the SQL query and say, "Okay, there is an insert. I need to get that data." It will get the data from the redo log itself rather than going to a database. Then, it will just pass that transaction into the target system, where it will just insert the data. And this happens instantaneously, within a microsecond. So, if there is an insert, an update, or a delete, everything is transferred immediately. It is picked from the redo log because it comes to the redo log, and then the redo log sends it to Qlik Replicate and Replicate to the target system on which Replicate is installed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"This solution is extremely flexible and scalable."

"The integration with different technologies is the most valuable feature."

"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."

"The system is basically user-driven, mostly operating as a local platform."

"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"It's very user-friendly when it comes to settings and configuration. It also offers very detailed logging about warnings and errors."

"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"Qlik Replicate's ability to correctly map and replicate data, especially when converting complex fields like packed decimal fields into integers, stands out."

More Qlik Replicate pros

Cons

"This solution would benefit from the engine being made more lightweight."

"There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required."

"Their technical support needs improvement."

"IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be more scalable. It should have the option to change the configuration to run on a single, non-multiple node, or multi-threading processing."

"Some features on the graphical user interface are clunky."

"It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

"The solution's flexibility to work with APIs should also be improved since it is very weak in working with APIs."

"The disadvantage is people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly."

"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved."

"The UI and data version control can be improved."

"There is complexity involved in the licensing part of this system."

More Qlik Replicate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Server depends on how many users there are."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

14%

Insurance Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere Information Server?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Information Server?

There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required. In our company, we are presently in the process of doing a PoC phase since we have the solution cu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Information Server?

I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking for transformation purposes.

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

There is complexity involved in the licensing part of this system. It is a core-based licensing, which, especially in the banking industry, results in the system capacity being utilized up to a max...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

An example involving the banking project I am currently working on is for a public sector bank in India. Primarily, they are using a database, and the ultra architecture is meant to take a backup o...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 72% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 5% of the time

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 19% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 17% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 2% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2025

IBM InfoSphere Information Server report

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

February 2025

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Also Known As

InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Overview

IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a market-leading data integration platform which includes a family of products that enable you to understand, cleanse, monitor, transform, and deliver data, as well as to collaborate to bridge the gap between business and IT. InfoSphere Information Server provides massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities to deliver a highly scalable and flexible integration platform that handles a variety of data volumes (big, small, and everything in between).

IBM

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate

February 2025

Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.