Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs Qlik Replicate comparison

IBM and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qlik is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 1.1% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.
IBM InfoSphere Information ...
Read 7 IBM InfoSphere Information Server reviews
  • 1,151 Views
  • 965 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Qlik Replicate
Read 16 Qlik Replicate reviews
  • 4,490 Views
  • 3,809 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and IBM InfoSphere Information Server are in the data integration domain. Qlik Replicate may seem advantageous due to its pricing and support, while IBM InfoSphere impresses with its feature set.

Features: Qlik Replicate facilitates real-time data integration, offers ease of use, and ensures high data accuracy. IBM InfoSphere excels in data governance, data quality, and comprehensive integration, catering to complex enterprise requirements.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate could enhance its AI capabilities to meet more sophisticated data needs, expand its suite of connectors, and improve its data transformation features. IBM InfoSphere might focus on simplifying its deployment process, reducing initial costs, and enhancing user interface design for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate is noted for its simple deployment and accessible customer service, minimizing operational downtime. IBM InfoSphere, though featuring a complex setup due to extensive features, offers robust support to navigate deployment challenges effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate is cost-effective with low setup costs and rapid ROI due to quick deployment. IBM InfoSphere, despite its higher initial costs, promises significant ROI for large enterprises through enhanced data management capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Information ...
Ranking in Data Integration
33rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Metadata Management (7th)
Qlik Replicate
Ranking in Data Integration
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Server is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 3.6%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

UmeshKumar1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability
IBM InfoSphere Information Server has multiple tools in that product suite. However, we mainly use it as an integration tool I have been using IBM InfoSphere Information Server for approximately five years. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable. IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be…
Read full review
KrishnaBaddam - PeerSpot reviewer
Lightweight tool, ensures that data is replicated across different systems and simplify complex tasks such as defining relationships
Qlik Compose is something that will automate user's overall data modernization. Here data modernization includes data modeling, ETL jobs, etc. But the advantage is users can automate the overall process of data engineering and data modeling through Qlik Compose. I think that's useful when users are able to manage 60% of the workload automated. That will be very useful. That's fantastic. Replicate does not have a great AI capability. AI capabilities are present in Qlik Sense. Qlik Replicate is a very light tool. It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change. So, it basically integrates with the kernel of the operating system. The way it works is that these replicate tools will integrate with the kernel of the operating system, and they will access the redo log files of the database. The redo log should have access to all the files of the structure of the schema, too. So, using that technique, they redo all the data structures, create a similar structure, and replicate the structure in the target schema, table, and database. After that is done, it will start tracing the instances that are happening. For example, if data is inserted into the table, then an insert is fired on the statement on the table. So, that particular insert is captured. And based on that insert statement, it will pull the SQL query and say, "Okay, there is an insert. I need to get that data." It will get the data from the redo log itself rather than going to a database. Then, it will just pass that transaction into the target system, where it will just insert the data. And this happens instantaneously, within a microsecond. So, if there is an insert, an update, or a delete, everything is transferred immediately. It is picked from the redo log because it comes to the redo log, and then the redo log sends it to Qlik Replicate and Replicate to the target system on which Replicate is installed.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable."
"The integration with different technologies is the most valuable feature."
"This solution is extremely flexible and scalable."
"Low-priced reporting and analytics solution, with good scalability and stability. It has on-premises and cloud versions that are cohesive and can integrate well."
"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."
"Support has been great."
"Great with replicating and updating records."
"Qlik Replicate's ability to correctly map and replicate data, especially when converting complex fields like packed decimal fields into integers, stands out."
"The most valuable features of Qlik Replicate are its CDC performance and trigger functions. CDC feature is important to the financial industry."
"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."
"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."
More Qlik Replicate pros
 

Cons

"IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be more scalable. It should have the option to change the configuration to run on a single, non-multiple node, or multi-threading processing."
"There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required."
"This solution would benefit from the engine being made more lightweight."
"Their technical support needs improvement."
"The UI and data version control can be improved."
"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."
"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."
"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."
"The product should improve its licensing limitation."
"In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst."
"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes. We set up the EC2, to allow them to go to the server and click on the Replicate icon, it just opens up and just sits there. At that point, we have to go into the EC2 and then reboot the server. This should be fixed, it is frustrating."
"It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious."
More Qlik Replicate cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Server depends on how many users there are."
"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."
"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."
"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."
"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."
"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Government
15%
Insurance Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required. In our company, we are presently in the process of doing a PoC phase since we have the solution cu...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking for transformation purposes.
See all answers
What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?
The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?
Some features on the graphical user interface are clunky. Accessing certain functions like replicating from a table after a specific date requires obscure key combinations, which could be made more...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?
The primary use case is using Qlik Replicate to interface with DB2, allowing for efficient data replication from various sources into a common one or other destinations. It is particularly benefici...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Compared 73% of the time
Oracle GoldenGate vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server Logo
Oracle GoldenGate vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server Logo
IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Compared 6% of the time
Alation Data Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server Logo
Alation Data Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Compared 4% of the time
More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Competitors
Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate
Compared 18% of the time
AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate Logo
AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate
Compared 17% of the time
Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate
Compared 12% of the time
Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Replicate
Compared 10% of the time
Precisely Connect vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Precisely Connect vs Qlik Replicate
Compared 2% of the time
More Qlik Replicate Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Data Integration
January 2025
IBM InfoSphere Information Server reportDownload IBM InfoSphere Information Server product report
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Replicate
January 2025
Qlik Replicate reportDownload Qlik Replicate product report
 

Also Known As

InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server
Replicate, Qlik Replicate
 

Learn More

Video not available
IBM
Qlik
 

Overview

IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a market-leading data integration platform which includes a family of products that enable you to understand, cleanse, monitor, transform, and deliver data, as well as to collaborate to bridge the gap between business and IT. InfoSphere Information Server provides massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities to deliver a highly scalable and flexible integration platform that handles a variety of data volumes (big, small, and everything in between).

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support. 

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

 

Sample Customers

Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia
American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare
Buyer's Guide
IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate
January 2025
Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.