Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs Qlik Replicate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Qlik Replicate improved efficiency by saving hours, reducing costs, minimizing database usage, and enhancing data analysis focus and accuracy.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
Customer service experiences with IBM InfoSphere Information Server vary, but technical support is generally praised for its promptness.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
IBM InfoSphere is flexible and scalable, though improvements in configuration and data handling are suggested by some.
Sentiment score
7.1
Qlik Replicate is favored for scalability, adaptability, and performance, suitable for different organizations despite some scaling effort.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Users praise IBM InfoSphere Information Server's stability, with minimal issues reported, notably occasional job locks due to internet speed.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

IBM InfoSphere needs better index handling, user-friendly features, enhanced cloud support, and improvements in technical support and performance.
Qlik Replicate needs interface improvements, better support, enhanced integration, pricing clarity, licensing flexibility, and optimized performance and marketing.
 

Setup Cost

Qlik Replicate is costly, core-based, with scalable benefits, favoring larger companies; pricing around $45,000 per annual subscription.
 

Valuable Features

IBM InfoSphere is valued for integration, flexibility, performance, and efficient administration, handling data changes, and partitioned databases.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Information ...
Ranking in Data Integration
32nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Metadata Management (9th)
Qlik Replicate
Ranking in Data Integration
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Server is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 3.5%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

UmeshKumar1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability
IBM InfoSphere Information Server has multiple tools in that product suite. However, we mainly use it as an integration tool I have been using IBM InfoSphere Information Server for approximately five years. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable. IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be…
KrishnaBaddam - PeerSpot reviewer
Lightweight tool, ensures that data is replicated across different systems and simplify complex tasks such as defining relationships
Qlik Compose is something that will automate user's overall data modernization. Here data modernization includes data modeling, ETL jobs, etc. But the advantage is users can automate the overall process of data engineering and data modeling through Qlik Compose. I think that's useful when users are able to manage 60% of the workload automated. That will be very useful. That's fantastic. Replicate does not have a great AI capability. AI capabilities are present in Qlik Sense. Qlik Replicate is a very light tool. It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change. So, it basically integrates with the kernel of the operating system. The way it works is that these replicate tools will integrate with the kernel of the operating system, and they will access the redo log files of the database. The redo log should have access to all the files of the structure of the schema, too. So, using that technique, they redo all the data structures, create a similar structure, and replicate the structure in the target schema, table, and database. After that is done, it will start tracing the instances that are happening. For example, if data is inserted into the table, then an insert is fired on the statement on the table. So, that particular insert is captured. And based on that insert statement, it will pull the SQL query and say, "Okay, there is an insert. I need to get that data." It will get the data from the redo log itself rather than going to a database. Then, it will just pass that transaction into the target system, where it will just insert the data. And this happens instantaneously, within a microsecond. So, if there is an insert, an update, or a delete, everything is transferred immediately. It is picked from the redo log because it comes to the redo log, and then the redo log sends it to Qlik Replicate and Replicate to the target system on which Replicate is installed.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Government
14%
Insurance Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required. In our company, we are presently in the process of doing a PoC phase since we have the solution cu...
What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Information Server?
I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking for transformation purposes.
What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?
The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...
What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?
Some features on the graphical user interface are clunky. Accessing certain functions like replicating from a table after a specific date requires obscure key combinations, which could be made more...
What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?
The primary use case is using Qlik Replicate to interface with DB2, allowing for efficient data replication from various sources into a common one or other destinations. It is particularly benefici...
 

Also Known As

InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server
Replicate, Qlik Replicate
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia
American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.