Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Integration Bus vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
IBM Integration Bus enhances ROI through effective integration, long-term value, cost savings, and sustained market readiness.
Sentiment score
7.2
Organizations benefit from SEEBURGER Suite's efficiency and automation, achieving cost savings and reduced manual tasks, boosting ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
IBM Integration Bus' customer service is generally praised but has issues with costs, response time, and varying support quality.
Sentiment score
7.3
SEEBURGER's support is responsive with quick high-severity responses, though language barriers and customization needs can occasionally delay assistance.
The support provided by SEEBURGER is excellent.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM Integration Bus offers scalable, efficient integration for enterprise applications, with strong adaptability and performance in high-volume environments.
Sentiment score
7.4
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is scalable, flexible for cloud/on-premises use, and adaptable for increased capacities and partner integrations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
IBM Integration Bus is reliable and stable, rated highly by users, despite occasional Oracle connectivity and latency issues.
Sentiment score
8.0
SEEBURGER Suite is stable and reliable, with proper setup ensuring performance amid rare, non-software-related issues and regular updates.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a very stable product, and I haven't noticed any significant drawbacks.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Integration Bus needs interface, performance, and cloud improvements, plus enhanced support, flexibility, resources, and better pricing.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite struggles with interface, monitoring, and data handling, needing enhancements in integration, support, and customization.
Acquiring training documents on a public domain for SEEBURGER is challenging.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Integration Bus pricing is competitive yet costly, varying by license, making it viable for larger enterprises.
SEEBURGER's pricing is mid-tier, flexible, yet complex, with scalability options and negotiable prices for substantial benefits.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Integration Bus offers excellent protocol support, performance, scalability, and integration capabilities with systems like SAP and Oracle.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite offers seamless EDI automation, platform independence, and user-friendly, scalable integration with SAP and complex protocols.
It comes pre-loaded with solutions, meaning it is ready to use without requiring significant development.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Integration Bus
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (1st)
SEEBURGER Business Integrat...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (6th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (14th), API Management (23rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM Integration Bus is designed for Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and holds a mindshare of 22.2%, up 20.9% compared to last year.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, on the other hand, focuses on Business-to-Business Middleware, holds 10.1% mindshare, up 7.9% since last year.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

Ashraf Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
Helpful for complex integrations because it has tools and functionality to integrate with other systems
Everything needs to be improved. As far as integration and the cloud are concerned, things are moving to the cloud side. When you use Kubernetes and similar technologies, IBM Integration Bus doesn't greatly facilitate these environments. Maybe I don't know enough about that, but I feel that when it comes to the DevOps environment, the tool needs to be deployed on production in a way that's just like pods. Cloud integration needs to be more facilitated with the DevOps environment. This IBM technology needs to adapt because in the recent world, in the real world, we see that everything is just a cloud pod. Whenever you need to scale anything, you just put some cloud and pod and improve it, make any server and deploy it. But in IBM Integration Bus, there is a problem because we can't do this as easily. In short, IBM needs to more emphasize or more integrate with the cloud environments as well, similar to DevOps. There are limitations in IBM Integration Bus when it comes to DevOps.
VARUNKUMAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Great end-to-end integration, data mapping, and communication protocols
At this moment, everything is working fine. When we are talking to them, when we are trying to bring all this mapping in-house, right now, SEEBURGER is doing everything for us. However, when we are thinking of going onto the cloud, so they are not using any of AWS or Azure which are more stable. They have their own private cloud. That's the reason we did not go ahead with managing everything by ourselves or moving into the cloud. They said that they're going to be doing it within the next two years, having access to Azure and AWS. That would be something we would like to see.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
What do you like most about IBM Integration Bus?
The message queue, like, message queue connectors. Then they have a built in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP, oracle database, and this Civil connector is there. Of course, we have thi...
What do you like most about SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
I've heard that the solution is cheaper when compared to other products in the market.
What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
The solution's documentation is not up to the mark and needs to be improved.
 

Also Known As

IBM WebSphere ESB
SEEBURGER BIS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Salesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: March 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.