IBM MobileFirst vs Temenos Quantum comparison

"I like Its capability for developing hybrid applications, with an ability to integrate device-native code as well"

"IBM MobileFirst has one of the most feature-rich admin panels."

"With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming technology. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product."

"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."

"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."

"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."

"There are issues with push notifications, especially for Windows mobile apps. JSONStore also crashes abruptly at times."

"I would like to see improved support for native device functions."

"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."

"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"

"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."

"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."

"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."

"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."

"Cost depends upon various factors. Size of the overall application and product usage matter a lot. For an enterprise-grade application, this certainly comes out as an economical solution. However, for small-scale applications, it can turn out to be on the higher side."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"It is expensive solution."

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."