IBM MobileFirst vs Temenos Quantum comparison

"IBM MobileFirst has one of the most feature-rich admin panels."

"I like Its capability for developing hybrid applications, with an ability to integrate device-native code as well"

"With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming technology. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."

"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."

"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."

"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."

"I like the complete, professional social site."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"There are issues with push notifications, especially for Windows mobile apps. JSONStore also crashes abruptly at times."

"I would like to see improved support for native device functions."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."

"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"

"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."

"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"Cost depends upon various factors. Size of the overall application and product usage matter a lot. For an enterprise-grade application, this certainly comes out as an economical solution. However, for small-scale applications, it can turn out to be on the higher side."

"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"It is expensive solution."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."