Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and IBM Netezza Performance Server compete in the high-performance data warehousing category. Microsoft seems to have an advantage due to its integration benefits, whereas IBM is preferred for performance and scalability.
Features: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, flexible adaptability across environments, and powerful tools for data analytics. IBM Netezza Performance Server offers advanced analytics capabilities, high-speed processing, and robust tools for managing large datasets efficiently.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse could improve by providing more advanced analytics features, reducing initial setup complexity for non-Microsoft environments, and enhancing scalability options. IBM Netezza Performance Server may benefit from better integration with non-Linux platforms, reducing hardware dependency, and streamlining user interface options for ease of use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse facilitates smooth deployment for existing Microsoft users with comprehensive support. IBM Netezza Performance Server provides straightforward deployment and strong issue resolution, focusing on an optimized customer experience through tailored support services.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse requires a significant initial investment but is cost-effective over time due to integration and operational cost savings. IBM Netezza Performance Server tends to have higher setup costs but offers considerable ROI through efficient data processing and advanced feature sets.
Technical support is very costly for me, accounting for twenty-five to thirty percent of the product cost.
It is provided as a pre-configured box, and scaling is not an option.
I give the scalability an eight out of ten, indicating it scales well for our needs.
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is stable for us because it is built on SQL Server.
The cloud version is only available in AWS, and in the Middle East, it is not well-developed in the Azure environment.
When there are many users or many expensive queries, it can be very slow.
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is excellent but very expensive.
The ETL designing process could be optimized for better efficiency.
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is very expensive.
It operates as a high-speed data warehouse, which is essential for handling big data.
The columnstore index enhances data query performance by using less space and achieving faster performance than general indexing.
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is used in the logistics area for optimizing SQL queries related to the loading and unloading of trucks.
The interface is very user-friendly.
The traditional structured relational data warehouse was never designed to handle the volume of exponential data growth, the variety of semi-structured and unstructured data types, or the velocity of real time data processing. Microsoft's SQL Server data warehouse solution integrates your traditional data warehouse with non-relational data and it can handle data of all sizes and types, with real-time performance.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
