IBM Planning Analytics vs KiSSFLOW comparison

Read 12 KiSSFLOW reviews

63 Views
33 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and KiSSFLOW are competing in the digital transformation and planning space. IBM Planning Analytics has the upper hand in technical data modeling and pricing, whereas KiSSFLOW excels in process automation and usability.

Features:IBM Planning Analytics includes robust data integration, budget forecasting, and advanced analytics. It integrates well with other IBM tools, offering extensive customization options. KiSSFLOW focuses on automation, process management, and intuitive workflows, making it ideal for businesses seeking ease and speed in operations. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and processes is notable.

Room for Improvement:IBM Planning Analytics could improve its user interface to better match the intuitive appeal of competing platforms and enhance process automation capabilities. It could also benefit from reduced setup complexity. KiSSFLOW could enhance its integration capabilities with data-heavy applications, expand its custom workflow features, and improve reporting functionalities to include more advanced analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:IBM Planning Analytics involves a significant setup process but benefits from comprehensive professional support. KiSSFLOW, on the other hand, offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment with minimal setup, supported by responsive customer service that efficiently serves non-technical users.

Pricing and ROI:IBM Planning Analytics has higher initial costs, with substantial long-term ROI from advanced analytics capabilities. KiSSFLOW offers a lower entry cost, facilitating immediate process efficiencies and rapid ROI through workflow management. The differentiation stems from IBM’s complex deployment costs against KiSSFLOW’s simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. KiSSFLOW Report (Updated: April 2025).

IBM Planning Analytics vs. KiSSFLOW

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

KiSSFLOW

Ranking in Business Performance Management

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (11th), Rapid Application Development Software (14th), Low-Code Development Platforms (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 8.7%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KiSSFLOW is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Gnanavel-Chakkarapani

Junior Consultant at CMA CGM

Can easily create dashboards and helps businesses improve forecasting accuracy

The product has improved our company's forecasting accuracy since it serves as a very useful tool for our sales and controller teams as they easily get to enter the inputs using views in TM1, which gets loaded into our main database. If there are sales team members in different parts of the world, like in Hong Kong and Singapore, they may prefer to use IBM Planning Analytics, which is easy to use when compared to the Excel tool. Speaking about planning analytics and data analysis, I would say that our company used to use IBM Cognos Analytics for reporting, where we used to use Cognos Dynamic Cubes so that users can easily use its drag and drop features while getting to see the data for which the users had to wait for two to three minutes prior to its use. In our company, tons of data are loaded into the memory, and users can use Cognos Dynamic Cubes to analyze data and understand it. The AI capabilities of IBM have benefited our planning strategy as they are very useful for business. The tool allows the easy creation of dashboard reports using AI capabilities. No technical knowledge is required for business use cases. It is possible to integrate the product in scenarios where some new integrations are available. I remember that my company used Azure Data Factory to connect Azure, Oracle, and IBM WebSphere Application Server. When it comes to IBM Planning Analytics, it is complex to integrate it with LDAP and or any other authentication tool offered by Microsoft. In our company, some users like to integrate IBM Planning Analytics with the common LDAP or Microsoft AD, which we currently use for all our applications. The authentication part is difficult to configure with IBM Planning Analytics. The maintenance of the product is easy. My company has scheduled maintenance on the product every week, especially during forecast times, so that memories automatically lapse and users can freely access their servers. The use of the tool has had an impact on collaboration within our company's planning team since everyone knows how to easily access the data and publish the results. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Julius Jagdon

Business Tools at Motorola Solutions

The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver

When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user. For example, our RSN needs to approve the ticket first before it's moved to the next person rather than having them all grouped. It would be better if we could see all the tickets grouped at the same time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is flexible."

"The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized."

"The most valuable feature is that it is able to slice and dice the data."

"The scenario modeling capabilities are frequently used to create different scenarios, compare them, and see which action leads to which result."

"The product's stability is good."

"Its stability helps controllers win time in their planning processes."

"The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets"

"IBM Planning Analytics is easy to use and deploy. It is quick to develop. The calculation machine is also very fast."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

"The support team responds fast."

"The user interface is very, very good."

"The most valuable feature is the performance."

"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."

"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."

"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."

"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."

"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."

More KiSSFLOW pros

Cons

"Extracting data is a little slow."

"The new frontend Planning Analytics Workspace is not very good, it could be improved. I like the Planning Analytics functionality but it would be helpful if it could be more customizable. You can create a prediction and receive information but you cannot do feature engineering regarding the predictive models. If this was added it would be helpful."

"Scalability is quite hard to implement in TM1, largely since the on-premise installation chosen back in 2014. On a scale, I'd rate scalability at four, out of ten. It's difficult."

"Adding predefined templates could be beneficial."

"The workspace API should be improved and documented so we know better which objects are used."

"It's highly competitive right now, and all the vendors are in a race to put out new versions with additional features. IBM comes out with new versions too often, and it has an impact on quality."

"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments."

"It is a bit expensive, but it does the job."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."

"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."

"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."

"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."

"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."

"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."

"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."

"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."

More KiSSFLOW cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription."

"The product costs $15 per user per month."

"Your company must subscribe to the solution if you create a business account."

"Kissflow's licensing cost is lower than other products. However, the contract has changed with the second version they have given us, which is the low-code one."

"The license is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

43%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

TM1 is quite expensive, and I'd rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. While we do get what we want in terms of functionalities and compatibility with other IBM tools, given the product's old arc...

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

Since I'm using TM1 as an old version of Planning Analytics, it wouldn't be fair to specify what needs improvement because it's possible these issues have already been addressed in newer versions. ...

What do you like most about KiSSFLOW?

The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KiSSFLOW?

The license is very expensive. However, there are no additional costs to the standard license.

What needs improvement with KiSSFLOW?

One area where Kissflow can be improved is customization, specifically, the ability to modify the input fields, UI, and design elements. Currently, it's not possible to alter the colors or make the...

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 19% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 10% of the time

Jedox vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Cognos vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

ServiceNow vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 18% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 17% of the time

Camunda vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 11% of the time

More KiSSFLOW Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Planning Analytics

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Download KiSSFLOW product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

No data available

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

IBM

KiSSFLOW understands that you know how to solve your office chaos problems better than anyone else. That’s why they created a cloud-based platform to help business leaders create, modify, and use automated business applications. You can make each application with beautiful, easy-to-use, and modern technology. You get the functionality of high-end BPM software with no coding or complicated mapping required, so you don’t have be a programmer to create amazing applications.

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.

IBM Planning Analytics vs. KiSSFLOW