Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.6
Oracle Cloud enhances ROI by saving costs, improving accuracy, accelerating processes, and boosting decision-making in financial operations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
IBM Planning Analytics support is generally effective but can be slow, requiring escalation for complex issues and delays occasionally.
Sentiment score
5.3
Oracle's support varies; domestic service is praised, overseas sees delays, but escalation often improves user satisfaction.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
IBM Planning Analytics is adaptable, scalable, efficiently supports growth, and handles large user numbers, depending on sufficient RAM.
Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud excels in scalability, integration, and adaptability, outperforming competitors like OneStream in organizational growth.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM Planning Analytics is praised for stability and performance, though configuration issues and vendor support delays are noted.
Sentiment score
7.4
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is stable and effective, with minor setup issues but improved reliability over previous solutions.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Planning Analytics needs integration, usability enhancements, AI features, improved templates, and simplified pricing for better competitiveness.
Oracle Planning Cloud requires improved performance, integration, and customization for enhanced user experience and functionality.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Planning Analytics costs include licensing and setup fees, with benefits varying by user type and company size.
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud costs about $40,000 yearly, with pricing factors including size, users, and data volume.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Planning Analytics provides flexible modeling, real-time calculations, Excel integration, and advanced features for efficient budgeting and forecasting.
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud delivers advanced budgeting, customization, and integration features, enhancing flexibility and performance over competitors.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics
Ranking in Business Performance Management
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Planning and Budgeti...
Ranking in Business Performance Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Financial Performance and Strategy Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 9.5%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is 6.3%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management
 

Featured Reviews

Gnanavel-Chakkarapani - PeerSpot reviewer
Can easily create dashboards and helps businesses improve forecasting accuracy
The product has improved our company's forecasting accuracy since it serves as a very useful tool for our sales and controller teams as they easily get to enter the inputs using views in TM1, which gets loaded into our main database. If there are sales team members in different parts of the world, like in Hong Kong and Singapore, they may prefer to use IBM Planning Analytics, which is easy to use when compared to the Excel tool. Speaking about planning analytics and data analysis, I would say that our company used to use IBM Cognos Analytics for reporting, where we used to use Cognos Dynamic Cubes so that users can easily use its drag and drop features while getting to see the data for which the users had to wait for two to three minutes prior to its use. In our company, tons of data are loaded into the memory, and users can use Cognos Dynamic Cubes to analyze data and understand it. The AI capabilities of IBM have benefited our planning strategy as they are very useful for business. The tool allows the easy creation of dashboard reports using AI capabilities. No technical knowledge is required for business use cases. It is possible to integrate the product in scenarios where some new integrations are available. I remember that my company used Azure Data Factory to connect Azure, Oracle, and IBM WebSphere Application Server. When it comes to IBM Planning Analytics, it is complex to integrate it with LDAP and or any other authentication tool offered by Microsoft. In our company, some users like to integrate IBM Planning Analytics with the common LDAP or Microsoft AD, which we currently use for all our applications. The authentication part is difficult to configure with IBM Planning Analytics. The maintenance of the product is easy. My company has scheduled maintenance on the product every week, especially during forecast times, so that memories automatically lapse and users can freely access their servers. The use of the tool has had an impact on collaboration within our company's planning team since everyone knows how to easily access the data and publish the results. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
Prithwish Kumar Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Budgeting scenarios and versions helps us migrate data, visualize data, and do variant reporting
The best thing about the tool is the budgeting scenarios and versions. It helps us migrate data, visualize data, and do variant reporting. There are approval processes that allow users to submit data, whether for budgeting or forecasting. When they submit, it goes up in the hierarchy for approval. If the data looks good to the manager, they can approve it. This is a very unique feature that we get. The approval process is a back-and-forth process; it doesn't get finalized in one go. Another feature is the business rules, where we can give users the flexibility to run calculations on demand. We can set runtime prompts for them, so they can run the calculation for whichever year or factors they want. They just need to know the value they want. Everything else can be set up by the admins. These are the flexibilities that we can give the user.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
48%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?
The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?
The cost of IBM Planning Analytics is not cheap, considering the amount of money involved. However, it offers good ROI for customers.
What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?
The workspace API should be improved and documented so we know better which objects and tier-one objects are used.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
While cloud pricing may initially appear more expensive due to the absence of infrastructure expenses, it is fair. There's no need for physical servers or infrastructure management. The licensing i...
What needs improvement with Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
Oracle made a mistake by forcing HFM users to transition to FCCS before the solution was mature enough. It caused many clients to opt for OneStream due to its similarity with HFM. FCCS initially la...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
I have implemented Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud in many industries, such as manufacturing, banks, construction, and health business. It's an amazing software. In the past, Oracle was the mai...
 

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1
Oracle PBCS, Oracle Enterprise Business Planning
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services
Australian Finance Group Ltd., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., TBS Group, Delaware Life Insurance, Shelf Drilling Ltd., Abu Dhabi Department of Finance, Fugro Norway AS, Drake & Scull International PJSC (DSI), Racepoint Global, Edgewater Technology Inc., King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Communications Test Design Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.