Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Policy Tester vs PractiTest comparison

IBM and PractiTest are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. IBM is ranked #30, while PractiTest is ranked #18. IBM holds a 0.5% mindshare in TMT, compared to PractiTest’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution.
IBM Rational Policy Tester
  • 53 Views
  • 30 Comparison Views
PractiTest
Read 7 PractiTest reviews
  • 255 Views
  • 175 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Policy Tester and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,600 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Policy Tester
Ranking in Test Management Tools
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PractiTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
18th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Policy Tester is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 2.6%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Rational Policy Tester?
Share your opinion
DC
Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat
It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest Logo
Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest
Compared 29% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest
Compared 29% of the time
Jira vs PractiTest Logo
Jira vs PractiTest
Compared 24% of the time
TestRail vs PractiTest Logo
TestRail vs PractiTest
Compared 19% of the time
More PractiTest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
March 2025
IBM Rational Policy Tester reportDownload IBM Rational Policy Tester product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
April 2025
PractiTest reportDownload PractiTest product report
 

Also Known As

Rational Policy Tester
No data available
 

Overview

IBM Rational Policy Tester audits websites for issues impacting compliance and effectiveness. Policy Tester drives significant cost out of the online operation by automating manual processes and identifying and prioritizing issues for immediate resolution.
IBM

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


PractiTest
 

Sample Customers

Ilmarinen, Brazilian Lymphoma and Leukemia Society, Government of South Australia Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Swiss Export Risk Insurance, The Motorists Insurance Group, Nuance Communications Inc.
Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
March 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.