PractiTest vs TestRail comparison

PractiTest and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. PractiTest is ranked #15, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. PractiTest holds a 2.4% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 13.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PractiTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

276 Views
211 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 21 TestRail reviews

2,194 Views
1,026 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

PractiTest

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

TestRail and PractiTest are two prominent test management tools. TestRail leads in user satisfaction regarding features and customer service, while PractiTest's pricing and deployment are generally rated higher by users.

Features: TestRail is appreciated for its extensive reporting capabilities and effective integration with other tools. PractiTest excels in its customizable dashboards and traceability features. Users find TestRail's reporting more comprehensive, but PractiTest offers better customization.

Room for Improvement: TestRail users suggest enhancements in scalability and automation features. PractiTest users express the need for better performance speed and simplified navigation. Although both have areas needing improvement, TestRail’s automation and PractiTest's performance are the focal points.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestRail shows positive feedback on its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. PractiTest’s cloud-based deployment is quick, but its customer service receives mixed reviews. Thus, TestRail is preferred for support, whereas PractiTest wins in deployment time.

Pricing and ROI: TestRail's initial setup cost is seen as higher, but users report good long-term ROI. PractiTest offers competitive pricing upfront, and users also report a satisfactory ROI. PractiTest is more cost-effective initially, while TestRail provides better long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed PractiTest vs. TestRail Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. TestRail

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)

TestRail

Ranking in Test Management Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 2.4%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 13.2%, up from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

StuartBarker

Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities

I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"The product helps us create test cases and reports."

"This is a user friendly solution."

"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."

"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that there are various test case templates and test artifact maintenance."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."

"The reports should be more user-friendly."

"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."

"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."

"Better prediction of text."

"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Healthcare Company

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?

I use the solution for test management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

TestRail should improve its pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 27% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 25% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 19% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 16% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 13% of the time

QMetry Test Management vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

SpecFlow vs TestRail

Compared 4% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

February 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

January 2025

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

No data available

TestRail by Gurock

Overview

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

IDERA

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

PractiTest vs. TestRail

January 2025

Free Report: PractiTest vs. TestRail

Find out what your peers are saying about PractiTest vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PractiTest vs. TestRail report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.