We performed a comparison between Jira and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the Burndown Chart to see work that is outstanding."
"We have around 2000 plus users, so scale wise, there are no issues. We can easily scale up with multiple users."
"Kanban board: The board is easy to use and visually impressive to non-IT users, who found it easy to relate to."
"It's a very complete product overall."
"Jira is easy to use and there are a lot of tools that are integrated with it."
"A stable solution with no unplanned downtime."
"We integrate Jira with QRadar which is helpful."
"Jira is very useful for project management for internal projects."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"For our company, we're thinking about not only project management solutions but also collaboration solutions, and maybe if Jira had a chart or quick commenting option, it would be great."
"Jira is raising their prices for the license, which is like a trap because many other providers offer services like Jira but for much cheaper."
"Although it covers the overall requirements and measurements, it'll help if they had their own test execution feature."
"The automation feature needs to be more user-friendly."
"Reporting is something Jira could work on. The reporting capabilities should have the same flexibility we see in Excel, including the ability to manipulate data and create graphs. They need to have that, so we don't need to export to a spreadsheet."
"The performance is not so good sometimes. I know that fully depends on the implementation and the IT environment of Jira or the version of Jira installed. The performance is sometimes not so good. I would like to have a better response time from the Jira server. And it fully depends on the administration side of the Jira."
"The solution can improve by including test management functionality in a native bundle without plugins."
"The solution's stability could be improved, and it could be made more robust."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
Earn 20 points
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 20th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Jira is rated 8.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our Jira vs. PractiTest report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.