IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

IBM and Tricentis are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #15, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIT, compared to Tricentis’s 26.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

159 Views
88 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 110 Tricentis Tosca reviews

11,659 Views
6,508 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and IBM Rational Test Workbench are tools designed to facilitate automated testing, each serving their users in different ways. Tricentis Tosca currently has the upper hand due to its superior flexibility, ease of use, straightforward deployment, and more responsive customer service.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers model-based automation, risk-based testing, and broad scripting language support. IBM Rational Test Workbench is known for its integration with other IBM tools, comprehensive protocol support, and automated test script generation.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca needs better reporting mechanisms, increased support for various test types, and a more intuitive user interface. IBM Rational Test Workbench requires a more modern feel, quicker updates, and a reduced learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. IBM Rational Test Workbench deployment is more complex, requiring significant configuration, although its integration with other IBM products is beneficial. Tricentis Tosca stands out in customer service accessibility and efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is considered a costlier option but is viewed as providing better long-term value due to its powerful features and ease of use. IBM Rational Test Workbench offers more moderate pricing but some users feel its ROI is lower because of deployment complexity and slower responsiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in API Testing Tools

15th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (19th)

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in API Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 26.6%, up from 19.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features

The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools."

"The reporting is really nice."

"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."

"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."

"The initial setup isn't too difficult."

"This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily."

"I face no challenges or stability issues."

"Object Identification Wizard."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"I would like a better user interface."

"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."

"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."

"The product needs to improve its pricing. It also needs to improve the infrastructure and DEX agent setup."

"The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic."

"I would say the reporting part of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."

"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."

"Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."

"If you are purchasing less than five licenses, then the pricing is high. On a scale from one to ten, with one being low and ten being high pricing, I would rate this solution at eight."

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

March 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

March 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

No data available

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.