Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Users praise IBM Rational Test Workbench's responsive, knowledgeable support, though some mention occasional delays; overall satisfaction is high.
Sentiment score
7.1
Tricentis Tosca's customer service is praised for responsiveness but criticized for delays and inconsistent resolution times.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
IBM Rational Test Workbench needs better integration, improved reporting, enhanced performance, increased stability, simplified setup, and more comprehensive documentation.
Sentiment score
3.4
Tricentis Tosca needs improvements in integrations, performance, UI testing, AI features, mobile support, and better customer support.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
IBM Rational Test Workbench is efficient for large-scale testing, praised for automation, adaptability, and strong integration capabilities despite setup complexity.
Sentiment score
7.7
Tricentis Tosca is highly scalable for various applications, though there are some infrastructure and licensing cost challenges.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM Rational Test Workbench offers flexible, potentially costly pricing, appreciated for features but expensive compared to alternatives, with volume licensing available.
No sentiment score available
Tricentis Tosca's high licensing costs and complexity are often prohibitive for smaller organizations but beneficial for large enterprises.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Users praise IBM Rational Test Workbench for its reliability, robustness, and integration, but some report occasional glitches needing attention.
Sentiment score
6.7
Tricentis Tosca is stable, reliable, and highly rated, despite occasional minor issues with environment, network, and cloud storage.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
IBM Rational Test Workbench is favored for its integration, automation, comprehensive test coverage, and performance in continuous integration and delivery processes.
Sentiment score
7.4
Tricentis Tosca excels in scriptless automation, model-based testing, and ease of use, making it ideal for comprehensive testing.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench
Ranking in API Testing Tools
12th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
34th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (18th)
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in API Testing Tools
1st
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 27.1%, up from 20.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing
It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.
Antonio Oteri - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation
From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
 

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.