Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Security Network IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

IBM and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. IBM is ranked #23, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in ID, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
IBM Security Network IPS
Read 4 IBM Security Network IPS reviews
  • 328 Views
  • 245 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Read 25 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews
  • 3,368 Views
  • 2,355 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM Security Network IPS and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Network IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Network IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
23rd
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Network IPS is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 7.5%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Jacob_Koithra - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 26, 2022
User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive
Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies. XGS 7100 has an end of support for the 30th of December 2022. Many are losing support. All the products of the XGS, including XGS 3100, 4100, 5100, and 7100, support is ending in December 2022. We need to know what is the plan post that? Do we need to spend money on them? Will that be extended? There has been no communication on the website either. It's an expensive device.
Read full review
Carlos Bracamonte - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 15, 2023
Robust, reliable, simple to install and good technical support
We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection. I'm not sure what the remaining threat protection features are off the top of my head. But beyond that, we use URL filtering. We have three approved cases for using external dynamic lists that are stored in a bucket repository. Then, for each URL site that needs to be whitelisted, we add it to the external dynamic list in order to gain access to this email. I would like Wildfire to be implemented. We use the equivalent in Cisco is the integration policies. We have the Wildfire but we are not currently implementing it. We don't have the license to use it, but we are not currently implementing it until we present the use cases that the company gives some value to and they approve the use of it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is simple."
"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."
"You can scale the product."
"The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the market leader as far as security gateways and endpoint protection. Additionally, the threat database that is used is one of the best."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."
"It is a stable product."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."
"Edge protection is a valuable feature."
"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros
 

Cons

"I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."
"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud."
"I think they can use some improvement on FID."
"The organization mail security solutions could be improved. There is no mail security solution available."
"The documentation needs to be improved. I need better information about how to configure it and what the best practices are."
"Palo Alto's maintenance needs to be improved."
"The price of licenses should be lowered to make it less costly to scale our solution."
"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
"Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly."
"We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of operations is very low."
"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."
"It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."
"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."
"The pricing could be lower."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
"There is an initial, expensive investment but the return is good."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
It is a stable product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives. I would rate ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Darktrace vs IBM Security Network IPS Logo
Darktrace vs IBM Security Network IPS
Compared 100% of the time
More IBM Security Network IPS Competitors
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 15% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 12% of the time
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
Arista NDR vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Arista NDR vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
October 2024
IBM Security Network IPS reportDownload IBM Security Network IPS product report
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
October 2024
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report
 

Also Known As

Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
No data available
 

Learn More

IBM
Palo Alto Networks
 

Overview

IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

 

Sample Customers

Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
IBM Security Network IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
October 2024
Free Report: IBM Security Network IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Network IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Security Network IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.