IBM Storage Protect vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery comparison

IBM and Infrascale are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. IBM is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.5, while Infrascale is ranked #64. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in BRS, compared to Infrascale’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Infrascale users who would recommend it.

IBM Storage Protect

Read 3 IBM Storage Protect reviews

343 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infrascale Backup & Disaste...

Read 13 Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery reviews

507 Views
332 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Storage Protect

Infrascale Backup & Disaste...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery and IBM Storage Protect both offer robust backup and disaster recovery solutions. Based on user reviews, IBM Storage Protect has the upper hand due to its extensive features and reliability, despite its higher cost.

Features: Users find Infrascale to be simple and intuitive, making backup management straightforward. Key features include user-friendly interface, easy setup, and solid customer support. IBM Storage Protect is known for its flexibility, advanced data protection, and extensive scalability options. The main difference is IBM's superior feature set, which appeals to enterprises with complex needs.

Room for Improvement: Infrascale users suggest enhancements in scalability, better integration with other tools, and more robust analytics. IBM Storage Protect users indicate a need for a more user-friendly approach, quicker setup processes, and simplified management interfaces. The primary difference is that Infrascale users look for improvements in scale, while IBM users desire easier usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infrascale is noted for its smooth deployment process and responsive customer service, making it accessible for smaller teams. IBM Storage Protect requires more time for deployment due to its complex nature, but its customer service is well-regarded for its expertise. The significant difference is Infrascale’s simpler deployment versus IBM’s complexity, balanced by expert support.

Pricing and ROI: Infrascale is cost-effective, providing solid ROI for small to mid-sized businesses. IBM Storage Protect, despite its higher initial setup costs, offers substantial ROI due to its advanced capabilities tailored for larger enterprises. The key distinction is affordability for smaller businesses with Infrascale versus the justified premium pricing for IBM's extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Storage Protect vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Storage Protect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infrascale Backup & Disaste...

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

64th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (48th), Disaster Recovery as a Service (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (28th), SaaS Backup (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IBM Storage Protect is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Maik Zutz

Produktverantwortlicher Storage und Backup at BITMARCK TECHNIK GmbH

A stable enterprise solution for backup and restore

New workloads are not good for storage protect like container or virtual machines. IBM acknowledges that users and partners with companies do it better and integrate it into the product. It takes too much time to implement it in old Storage Protect. It have features for big databases and big data environments. Although, the product seems to be old fashioned, but it is stable, robust and works for the most use cases where a lot of data is to be protected. It could be easier to manage client data. You have to use configuration. It is not on modern architecture. They should change it on the client area. You can achieve a better environment using Protect. IBM tapes serves as an air gap, consumes less energy, and provides a resilient, stable environment with fewer infrastructure and environmental costs. Intergrating it can help store large amounts of data more cheaper than on disk.

Read full review

Harry Vining

Owner at Vtek Systems

The overall ease of use and ease of management using the dashboard is excellent

I can't really think of anything that really needs to be improved from my perspective, because I only use the backup. Maybe someone who is using something else might have a different opinion on that. But for the online backup and recovery tool, I'm not going to say there's anything that needs improvement. They can always improve stuff. But from the top of my head, I can't think of anything. It does what it needs to do. That's it. It doesn't need to do anything more than what it does and nothing less than what it's doing. The Infrascale dashboard when it comes to centralized deployment and configuration is excellent. I have no problems with the solution. They could always make it better. They can always make the GUI a little bit nicer, the interface level a bit better. There's always room for improvement, but there's nothing on the top of my head that's saying, "Hey, this is what needs to be fixed." But, the programmers are probably working on their own things. So, there's always room for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future."

"The tool's backup engine is very powerful. Previously, our client finished backup with HPE product in 48 hours. IBM Storage Protect completes backup in 8 hours."

"Overall, my experience with the solution is very positive, and I rate it a 9 out of 10."

"The ease of use is valuable. It is user-friendly. Performing backup and recovery can be done very intuitively with the solution and the interface that is part of the solution."

"The overall ease of use and ease of management of the solution using the Infrascale dashboard is excellent. I'd rate it 10 out of 10 because the dashboard is very simple to use. For someone with a technical background, it's a wonderful piece of software to be using in a cloud environment. But if you're not technical, then it might be a problem. It could be confusing for non-technical people. If you don't know what you're doing, you could kind of screw it up. Any human with two brain cells can do it. It's like anything else. So, once you train a human, they're good. Anybody can do it. Anybody with a competent brain can use it and go with a little bit of technical skill. It might be confusing in the beginning, but once you're trained up and you've used it a little bit, like anything else in your life, it'll be easy. They'll come as normal."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to boot locally, as well as in Infrascale's cloud. This means that we can either do on-site failover or failover to their cloud."

"What I like the most about it is that backups and restores are simple, straightforward, and clean. It does not require six people to get involved in order to do a restore or perform a backup."

"For this particular client, the solution’s Critical Server Insurance feature that protects physical and virtual servers including Windows, Linux, VMware, and Hyper-V, was a very big factor as well. They have a bunch of physical servers, as well as virtual. The mix is predominantly virtual. They also have some NAS boxes that we back up using Infrascale."

"Given that we are in the hurricane belt, the spin-up of replicated servers in the cloud is among the most valuable features. If our site goes down we can just connect to the cloud appliance, spin up the servers, and we are good to go."

"Its Critical Server Insurance feature for protecting physical and virtual servers, including Windows, Linux, VMware, and Hyper-V is mandatory for me and it makes me happy. If I had a backup solution that didn't do that, it would not be a backup solution and would not be any good."

"The initial setup was straightforward and we received support from the manufacturer."

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery pros

Cons

"The product should improve its GUI. It should also support Windows clustering."

"The solution is expensive."

"Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Protect does not work well with virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V."

"When you are ordering hardware appliances, they have to be delivered from America. In the past, hard drives on the appliance have been simple SSD drives that are installed. However, they don't have a local supply for the SSD drives in the UK. They have to be exported from the US, arrive, and then I have to go and install them. Then, they will rebuild it from their side of things. However, I could order that same SSD drive online and get it the next day. So, I have to wait days for things to come when I could get the exact same drive the next day in the UK, if I wanted to. That causes a bit of a problem. I don't know how many businesses they have in the UK, but I do think that having to import stuff from the US is a time-consuming problem. If there was a holding in the UK, then we wouldn't have that delay in time."

"Having options to replicate between their data centers, once the data is offsite, would be an improvement that they could make."

"One of the significant drawbacks of it is due to the fact that we're using two devices to manage the same vCenter, or virtualization environment, and they don't talk to each other. That means I can't easily see what VMs are already being protected. If I'm on Infrascale device "A" and I have protected these VMs, when I go over to device "B," I can't see that those VMs are already covered."

"In terms of what I would like to see, it would be to make the solution available across multiple clouds."

"When the product works, there is really nothing to fix, but they can allow different types of backups, such as differential or incremental backups."

"They set me up as a vendor, not as a client. So sometimes I end up in the wrong portal and I'm doing vendor things instead of client things, and I didn't realize that right away. Once I figured it out I just changed my favorites on my desktop to go to the client-side."

"There is room for improvement by making the interface a little more intuitive when navigating to recover flat files or an old server."

"I would like to be able to limit the bandwidth in cases, for example, where we are uploading the backup."

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM Storage Protect is not expensive and fits the needs of all business types. The licensing is based on a capacity-based model. You can take a license for one, two, or three terabytes."

"They are incredibly fair and willing to work with their partners to make their pricing work for both partners and the end users."

"The pricing is fair, and they are interested in working with MSPs as part of their market."

"The pricing is pretty good and competitive with the market. The per-terabyte pricing is very competitive compared to the others."

"Our licensing fees are billed every four months."

"The licensing is based on how much data you have plus what appliances you need."

"You get unlimited clients and buy a bucket of space. In addition to the standard fees there were setup fees."

"It is super competitive. It is worth taking a look at it from a licensing and pricing perspective."

"The appliances have different prices because of storage, size, and memory. For example, the older machines support more virtual machines, whereas the new one only supports one virtual machine. As we have purchased the later appliances, they have probably been a little bit more expensive because they have to be good enough to keep the business running if the physical server goes down. We learned our lesson from the one that went down when we tried to run products and it wasn't quick enough."

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

16%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Storage Protect?

The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Storage Protect?

IBM Storage Protect is generally an expensive tool. However, with good contracts with IBM or its partners, the cost might not be so high. New customers can expect very high prices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Storage Protect?

Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infrascale Platform?

They are incredibly fair and willing to work with their partners to make their pricing work for both partners and the end users. To someone considering Infrascale but is concerned about the price, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infrascale Platform?

When the product works, there is really nothing to fix, but they can allow different types of backups, such as differential or incremental backups.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infrascale Platform?

We use their online backup, their cloud-based backup, and their cloud-based Office 365 backup.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Protect vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 62% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Storage Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 14% of the time

More IBM Storage Protect Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 59% of the time

Zerto vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 22% of the time

Atempo Live Navigator vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Compared 19% of the time

More Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

March 2025

Download IBM Storage Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

April 2025

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery report

Download Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

Infrascale Platform

Overview

IBM Storage Protect is designed for data backup and recovery, ensuring protection of critical information and business continuity. It is ideal for managing large-scale datasets and offers compatibility across cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Storage Protect provides robust data backup and recovery features, supporting multiple workloads while integrating effortlessly with different platforms. It is known for reliable performance, scalability for growing storage needs, and automation of repetitive tasks. Users find it effective in protecting expansive datasets through efficient deduplication.

What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?

Data Backup and Recovery: Comprehensive data protection in diverse environments.
Integration: Seamless collaboration with various systems.
Scalability: Handles growing storage demands effectively.
Deduplication: Efficient data deduplication to optimize storage use.

What benefits or ROI should be considered when evaluating IBM Storage Protect?

Reliable Performance: Consistently protects multiple workloads.
Compatibility: Works well with cloud and on-premises systems.
Automation: Automates repetitive tasks to save time and resources.

IBM Storage Protect is implemented in various industries, supporting sectors with significant data management requirements like finance, healthcare, and retail. These industries benefit from its robust data protection, scalability, and ease of integration, making it a preferred choice for organizations with large and complex datasets.

IBM

Infrascale overcomes the complexity of creating backup and disaster recovery solutions without sacrificing performance and reliability. We provide fast, secure recovery that enables customers to feel confident that their data is fully protected from any type of disaster, whether it be operational, environmental, or malicious. Infrascale provides data protection for SaaS applications, endpoints, and servers.

SaaS BACKUP

Protect Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Box, Dropbox, and Salesforce data from accidental deletion and malicious attacks. Infrascale Cloud Application Backup (ICAB) provides customers with essential data protection that isn’t included in their SaaS provider’s limited retention policies. It also protects the broadest set of SaaS applications and delivers ease of use and ease of deployment.

ENDPOINT BACKUP

Direct-to-cloud backup and recovery solution for endpoints. Infrascale Cloud Backup (ICB) provides unlimited retention and version history, MSI installer and single pane of glass management, and ransomware anomaly detection. This delivers ease of use, ease of management, and protection from cybersecurity threats.

SERVER BACKUP AND DISASTER RECOVERY

Boot ready in minutes to run your systems when they go down due to any reason including server crashes, ransomware attacks, or natural disasters. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery (IBDR) provides boot-ready time for failover that averages 2 minutes as well as unlimited disaster recovery and failover testing. In order to eliminate downtime and data loss, IBDR also provides a centrally managed Infrascale Management Dashboard.

Infrascale

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MSPs servicing small and mid-size companies VARs servicing mid-sized companies Direct SMB or mid-sized companies

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Storage Protect vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Storage Protect vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Storage Protect vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors, best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors, and best SaaS Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.