IBM Storage Protect vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. IBM is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IBM Storage Protect

Read 3 IBM Storage Protect reviews

343 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,521 Views
931 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

IBM Storage Protect

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and IBM Storage Protect are enterprise-level data protection solutions. Users report being more satisfied with OpenText Data Protector's pricing and support, while IBM Storage Protect is favored for its advanced features and reliability.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is known for its easy-to-use backup and recovery features. Users value its straightforward system for managing backups, efficient data recovery processes, and user-friendly interface. IBM Storage Protect is valued for its scalability and comprehensive protection capabilities, featuring advanced data encryption, extensive integration options, and high reliability for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest OpenText Data Protector improve its reporting functionalities and user experience, addressing issues with detailed reporting accuracy, enhancing the user interface, and increasing automation options. IBM Storage Protect users recommend enhancing performance and reducing complexity, focusing on simplifying the setup process, improving system performance under load, and reducing the complexity of management tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, making it easier for businesses to implement and maintain. IBM Storage Protect, though effective, has a more complex deployment process and mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector's setup cost is generally seen as more affordable, with favorable ROI reported by users. Its initial setup and ongoing costs are budget-friendly for small to medium enterprises. IBM Storage Protect, while having higher initial costs, is viewed positively in terms of ROI, especially for organizations requiring comprehensive protection, making it a justified investment for larger-scale needs.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Storage Protect vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Storage Protect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IBM Storage Protect is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Maik Zutz

Produktverantwortlicher Storage und Backup at BITMARCK TECHNIK GmbH

A stable enterprise solution for backup and restore

New workloads are not good for storage protect like container or virtual machines. IBM acknowledges that users and partners with companies do it better and integrate it into the product. It takes too much time to implement it in old Storage Protect. It have features for big databases and big data environments. Although, the product seems to be old fashioned, but it is stable, robust and works for the most use cases where a lot of data is to be protected. It could be easier to manage client data. You have to use configuration. It is not on modern architecture. They should change it on the client area. You can achieve a better environment using Protect. IBM tapes serves as an air gap, consumes less energy, and provides a resilient, stable environment with fewer infrastructure and environmental costs. Intergrating it can help store large amounts of data more cheaper than on disk.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's backup engine is very powerful. Previously, our client finished backup with HPE product in 48 hours. IBM Storage Protect completes backup in 8 hours."

"Overall, my experience with the solution is very positive, and I rate it a 9 out of 10."

"The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future."

"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."

"The initial setup was relatively easy."

"It's user-friendly and not overly complicated to configure."

"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."

"Data Protector is quite simple and easy to deploy. The deployment is always the same. It's on a server, and the agents are deployed to the machines in a straightforward way. We have two engineers who deploy and manage all our backup solutions."

"OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers."

"Integration with HP storage is a very strong point for Micro Focus Data Protector. It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore. Zero downtime backup (ZDB) is one very important feature, which is basically the integration with the storage array. It is a very strong feature. We're using storage with snapshots with this integration."

"It's a good product that's pretty easy to use."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Protect does not work well with virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V."

"The product should improve its GUI. It should also support Windows clustering."

"The solution is expensive."

"It would be ideal if they could improve their level of support."

"If you compare the solution with the same specific features and enhancements on another solution, Data Protector is expensive. This is especially true when compared to, for example, Veeam."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."

"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"In general, you can say that Micro Focus Data Protector is behind in capabilities when compared with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, Symantec, NetBackup, but it is very strong for certain use cases such as array integration. We are using it in production even now. There should be some kind of cloud integration and archiving solutions. I think this is the area they need to focus on."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM Storage Protect is not expensive and fits the needs of all business types. The licensing is based on a capacity-based model. You can take a license for one, two, or three terabytes."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Storage Protect?

The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Storage Protect?

IBM Storage Protect is generally an expensive tool. However, with good contracts with IBM or its partners, the cost might not be so high. New customers can expect very high prices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Storage Protect?

Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Pro...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Protect vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 63% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Storage Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 14% of the time

More IBM Storage Protect Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 74% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 17% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

April 2025

Download IBM Storage Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

IBM Storage Protect is designed for data backup and recovery, ensuring protection of critical information and business continuity. It is ideal for managing large-scale datasets and offers compatibility across cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Storage Protect provides robust data backup and recovery features, supporting multiple workloads while integrating effortlessly with different platforms. It is known for reliable performance, scalability for growing storage needs, and automation of repetitive tasks. Users find it effective in protecting expansive datasets through efficient deduplication.

What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?

Data Backup and Recovery: Comprehensive data protection in diverse environments.
Integration: Seamless collaboration with various systems.
Scalability: Handles growing storage demands effectively.
Deduplication: Efficient data deduplication to optimize storage use.

What benefits or ROI should be considered when evaluating IBM Storage Protect?

Reliable Performance: Consistently protects multiple workloads.
Compatibility: Works well with cloud and on-premises systems.
Automation: Automates repetitive tasks to save time and resources.

IBM Storage Protect is implemented in various industries, supporting sectors with significant data management requirements like finance, healthcare, and retail. These industries benefit from its robust data protection, scalability, and ease of integration, making it a preferred choice for organizations with large and complex datasets.

IBM

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Storage Protect vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Storage Protect vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Storage Protect vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.