Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Watson Machine Learning vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio improved efficiency, reducing steps and errors, boosting ROI and aligning with customer expectations.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio provides varying support with strengths in consultancy and documentation, though first-line response delays exist.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is praised for its scalable cloud-based platform, efficiently supporting varying user sizes and tasks.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
IBM Watson Machine Learning is highly stable and reliable, with users reporting no downtime and minimal maintenance issues.
Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is stable and reliable, with occasional data-related hiccups and security environment concerns.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio requires better integration, enhanced features, cost clarity, improved security, and more user-friendly resources.
In future updates, I would appreciate improvements in integration and more AI features.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Watson Machine Learning pricing receives mixed reviews; it's competitive for some, costly for others, with usage-based costs.
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio pricing varies with options from free to enterprise, affecting cost-effectiveness based on usage.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Watson Machine Learning streamlines processes with automation, aiding integration, predictive analytics, decision-making, and enhancing generative AI capabilities.
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers a user-friendly, scalable platform with drag-and-drop, no-code development, and robust data integration.
Machine Learning Studio is easy to use, with a significant feature being the drag and drop interface that enhances workflow without any complaints.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Watson Machine Learning
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Machine Lea...
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the AI Development Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM Watson Machine Learning is 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is 12.1%, down from 17.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Anurag Mayank - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly efficient solution that delivers the desired results to its users
I had not considered how the solution could be improved because I was focused on how it was helping me to solve my issues. If I consider how we want to use it in our organization, certain areas of improvement can be addressed. For instance, we want to use it with Generative AI, not like ChatGPT, but in a way intended for industrial use. It would be beneficial to incorporate more AI into the solution.
Klaus Lozie - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good integration and used for data labeling
Lately, we have had some issues with the solution regarding labeling jobs. We can create a label job, but we still have to use the Azure Machine Learning REST APIs, which are not yet supported in the Python SDK version 2. Microsoft has a lot of documentation, but you can do it using the CLI, UI, or Python SDK version 2. You can have 100 ways of working, while I would like to have one way of working. It's very difficult to know what is best, according to Microsoft.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
University
13%
Educational Organization
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Watson Machine Learning?
I was particularly interested in trying the AutoML feature to see how it handles data and proposes new models. The variety of models it provides is impressive.
What needs improvement with IBM Watson Machine Learning?
Sometimes training the model is difficult. We need to have at least a few different components to evaluate and understand the behavior of different users to have a very, very high accuracy in the m...
Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?
The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure Machine Learning, MS Azure Machine Learning Studio
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Schneider Electric, BP
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Watson Machine Learning vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.