Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Watson OpenScale vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Watson OpenScale
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
18th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Machine Lea...
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the AI Development Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM Watson OpenScale is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is 12.1%, down from 17.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Watson OpenScale?
Share your opinion
Klaus Lozie - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 22, 2024
Provides good integration and used for data labeling
We use Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to train our models and for data labeling The solution's most beneficial feature is its integration with Azure. We are an Azure-based company, and the solution's integration feature allows us to log in through Cosmos DB or Application Insights.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The platform's price is low."
"The solution operates on a pay-per-use model."
"From a developer's perspective, I find the price of this solution high."
"My team didn't deal with the licensing for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, so I'm unable to comment on pricing, but the money that was spent on the tool was worth it."
"To use MLS is fairly cheap. Even the paid account is something like $20/month, unless you are provisioning large numbers of VMs for a Hadoop cluster. The main MS makes money with this solution is forcing the user to deploy their model on REST API, and being charged each time the API is accessed. There are several pricing tiers for the API. If you do not use the API, then value of MLS is to create rapid experiments ($20/month). The resulting model is not exportable to use, thus you’ll have to recreate the algorithms in either R or Python, which is what I did. MLS results gave me a direction to work with, the actual work is mostly done in R and Python outside of MLS."
"On a scale from one to ten, with ten being overpriced, I would rate the price of this solution at six."
"There isn’t any such expensive costs and only a standard license is required."
"There is a license required for this solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?
The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure Machine Learning, MS Azure Machine Learning Studio
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

KPMG
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Schneider Electric, BP
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in AI Development Platforms. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.