Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs Icinga comparison

Icinga and IDERA are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while IDERA is ranked #106. Icinga holds a 3.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to IDERA’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDERA users who would recommend it.
Icinga
Read 17 Icinga reviews
  • 3,466 Views
  • 3,080 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews
  • 153 Views
  • 113 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Icinga and IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor are in the network monitoring category. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor has the upper hand in terms of advanced feature offerings.

Features: Icinga provides customizable alerting, open-source flexibility, and community-driven development. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor offers advanced real-time analytics, multi-platform support, and extensive enterprise visibility.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could enhance its scalability, integrate more advanced analytics, and improve cross-platform support. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor could lower its initial setup costs, provide more intuitive user interfaces, and offer better community-driven resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga is appreciated for its simple setup and reliable community support. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor offers professional deployment options and dedicated customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga is notable for low setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor has a higher initial investment but is valued for delivering superior ROI over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Icinga Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Icinga
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Icinga
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
17th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
16th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th)
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
106th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
73rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 3.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Harrison Bulley - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification
I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.
Read full review
Nafiu Garba - PeerSpot reviewer
It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices
What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."
"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."
"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."
"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."
"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."
"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."
"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."
"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."
More Icinga pros
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
 

Cons

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."
"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."
"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."
"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."
"The user interface should be improved."
"The installation and configuration are very complex."
"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."
"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."
More Icinga cons
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."
"This is an open-source solution with paid support."
"The solution is cheap."
"We're using the free version of Icinga."
"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."
"It's an open-source solution."
"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."
"The solution is free to use."
"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Icinga?
The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?
It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Icinga?
There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga Logo
Zabbix vs Icinga
Compared 46% of the time
Nagios Core vs Icinga Logo
Nagios Core vs Icinga
Compared 23% of the time
Checkmk vs Icinga Logo
Checkmk vs Icinga
Compared 10% of the time
Nagios XI vs Icinga Logo
Nagios XI vs Icinga
Compared 3% of the time
Centreon vs Icinga Logo
Centreon vs Icinga
Compared 3% of the time
More Icinga Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Icinga
April 2025
Icinga reportDownload Icinga product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
March 2025
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reportDownload IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring
IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time
 

Overview

Icinga monitors systems, network devices, infrastructure, and services, helping manage and analyze server resources. It automates ticket incidents and alerting, providing oversight of client Windows and Linux systems.

Icinga offers comprehensive monitoring of servers including CPU utilization and RAM space, facilitating automated incident management and alerting. Frequently deployed on-premises, this monitoring tool is key for managed services providers and organizations to oversee and ensure optimal performance of various environments, including applications like databases and web servers. It provides extensive features for creating custom plugins, stabilization, scalability, and high customization capabilities suitable for different infrastructure needs.

What are the key features of Icinga?
  • Event Handler: Facilitates automatic self-healing of systems.
  • Extensive Plugin Library: Offers a wide range of plugins for monitoring.
  • Ease of Use: Simplifies user experience with an intuitive interface and Icinga Director for easy configurations.
  • Open-Source Nature: Free to use, modify, and distribute.
  • Automation Capabilities: Integrates with APIs and Ansible Collections for automation.
  • Custom Plugins: Users can create and integrate their own plugins.
  • Stability and Scalability: Provides reliable performance across different scale infrastructures.
What are the benefits or ROI to look for when evaluating Icinga?
  • Critical Issue Highlighting: Effectively identifies and notifies about critical problems.
  • High Customization: Offers flexibility for diverse monitoring needs.
  • Automated Alerting: Reduces manual effort and improves response times.
  • Extensive Integration: Works seamlessly with other tools and platforms.

Icinga implementations span multiple industries, providing essential monitoring for IT infrastructure in healthcare, finance, and education. Managed services providers utilize Icinga to maintain and monitor client systems across various environments while ensuring optimal performance and compliance. It is highly valued in these sectors for its ability to customize monitoring, improving operational efficiency and reducing downtime.

Icinga

Uptime Infrastructure Monitor helps IT administrators to unify performance monitoring and optimization of IT infrastructure. Unlike its competition, it provides monitoring of a broad range of platforms and applications, ability to set service-level agreements, and support of both agent and agentless monitoring.

IDERA
 

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö
Buyer's Guide
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Icinga
April 2025
Free Report: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Icinga
Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs. Icinga report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.