We performed a comparison between Inedo BuildMaster and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"We really appreciate that this solution is plug and play. When coding in the version control system, this product completes the build process automatically."
"Jenkins can be used for elastic management, if you have any sensitive data or credentials you can use them across the environment. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and can be used across multiple use cases."
"The automated elements are easy to use and you can put them into your server."
"Jenkins is very stable."
"We can schedule anything with Jenkins, which is useful for deployment or anything that requires scheduling. It also has multiple plugins we can use for Maven, JUnit, etc."
"The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its open source."
"There are a large number of plugins available for integration with third party systems."
"I like that you can find a wide range of plugins for Jenkins."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
"It could be cheaper."
"Jenkins could have better cloud functionality. Currently, we are using the existing legacy model, but we are moving toward the cloud, so it would be great if they could improve in that area. In the future, I would like more cloud features and related training materials, like a video tutorial."
"The scriptwriting process could be improved in this solution in the future."
"Jenkins could improve by allowing more scripting languages. We need to use Groovy scripting and it is difficult to debug and it is not ideal for creating file scripts. We tried to search for assistance but we did not find much help."
"The documentation is not helpful, as it is not user-friendly."
"It would be better if there were an option to remove its Java dependency. This would make it more compatible with other software, and it could be much better. At present, we have to depend on Java whenever we want to deploy agents."
"Logging could be improved to offer a clearer view."
"I would like to see even more integrations included in the next release."
Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review while Jenkins is ranked 2nd in Build Automation with 83 reviews. Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0, while Jenkins is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jenkins writes "A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment". Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with , whereas Jenkins is most compared with GitLab, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, IBM Rational Build Forge and Tekton.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.