Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Melissa Data Quality comparison

Informatica and Melissa are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Informatica is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.7, while Melissa is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Informatica holds a 20.6% mindshare in DQ, compared to Melissa’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Melissa users who would recommend it.

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Read 182 Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) reviews

2,677 Views
1,853 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Melissa Data Quality

Read 40 Melissa Data Quality reviews

436 Views
229 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Melissa Data Quality

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud and Melissa Data Quality compete in the data management and quality domain. Informatica IDMC has an advantage due to its robust data integration capabilities.

Features: IDMC offers extensive data integration with a variety of connectors and automation tools, AI-driven insights, and flexible scalability. Melissa Data Quality provides precise data verification and cleansing, focusing on address validation, geocoding, and contact data verification.

Room for Improvement: IDMC could enhance its initial cost-effectiveness, simplify setup processes, and expand support for more specialized data validation features. Melissa Data Quality might improve by enhancing its integration capabilities, developing more robust cloud-based features, and offering a wider range of automated data insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IDMC supports a cloud-based approach, ensuring efficient integration with multiple platforms and offering strong customer support. Melissa Data Quality offers both on-premises and cloud options, providing personalized customer service despite potentially complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: IDMC is a higher upfront investment with long-term ROI benefits through its scalability and comprehensive features. Melissa Data Quality is more cost-effective initially, offering essential data quality functions at a lower setup cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Ranking in Data Quality

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

182

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (3rd), Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Business-to-Business Middleware (4th), API Management (8th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Data Governance (2nd), Test Data Management (3rd), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (1st), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st), Data Masking (2nd), Metadata Management (1st), Test Data Management Services (3rd), Product Information Management (PIM) (1st), Data Observability (2nd)

Melissa Data Quality

Ranking in Data Quality

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Scrubbing Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is 20.6%, down from 25.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Melissa Data Quality is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

Raj Sethupathi

Data Integration Consultant GCP/AWS at Infogrators Inc

Offers profiling and address standardization but can be complicated

Informatica Data Quality has its data warehouse, primarily using Oracle and some SQL databases. You need a database to host the data. The cleansed version of the data is stored in the data warehouse. It integrates with PowerCenter and other Informatica tools. The integration details can be complex, but a regional setup is involved in this process. Profiling smaller datasets, such as 10,000-50,000 records, worked fine. However, unexpected issues could arise with larger datasets, such as thousands of records or more, especially with tables containing many columns. Handling tables with fifty or more columns can be challenging, even in Excel. A mismatch in data types could cause the entire system to crash. Continual enhancements are being made to address these issues, which can be unique to specific industries like finance and healthcare.

Read full review

GaryM

Data Architect at World Vision

SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing

- Scalability is a limitation as it is single threaded. You can bypass this limitation by partitioning your data (say by alphabetic ranges) into multiple dataflows but even within a single dataflow the tool starts to really bog down if you are doing survivorship on a lot of columns. It's just very old technology written that's starting to show its age since it's been fundamentally the same for many years. To stay relavent they will need to replace it with either ADF or SSIS-IR compliant version. - Licensing could be greatly simplified. As soon as a license expires (which is specific to each server) the product stops functioning without prior notice and requires a new license by contacting the vendor. And updating the license is overly complicated. - The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation but that isn't true since pretty much all SSIS components are resizable except theirs! This is just an annoyance but needless impact on productivity when developing new data flows. - The tool needs to provide for incremental matching using the MatchUp for SSIS tool (they provide this for other solutions such as standalone tool and MatchUp web service). We had to code our own incremental logic to work around this. - Tool needs ability to sort mapped columns in the GUI when using advanced survivorship (only allowed when not using column-level survivorship). - It should provide an option for a procedural language (such as C# or VB) for survivor-ship expressions rather than relying on SSIS expression language. - It should provide a more sophisticated ability to concatenate groups of data fields into common blocks of data for advanced survivor-ship prioritization (we do most of this in SQL prior to feeding the data to the tool). - It should provide the ability to only do survivor-ship with no matching (matching is currently required when running data through the tool). - Tool should provide a component similar to BDD to enable the ability to split into multiple thread matches based on data partitions for matching and survivor-ship rather than requiring custom coding a parallel capable solution. We broke down customer data by first letter of last name into ranges of last names so we could run parallel data flows. - Documentation needs to be provided that is specific to MatchUp for SSIS. Most of their wiki pages were written for the web service API MatchUp Object rather than the SSIS component. - They need to update their wiki site documentation as much of it is not kept current. Its also very very basic offering very little in terms of guidelines. For example, the tool is single-threaded so getting great performance requires running multiple parallel data flows or BDD in a data flow which you can figure out on your own but many SSIS practitioners aren't familiar with those techniques. - The tool can hang or crash on rare occasions for unknown reason. Restarting the package resolves the problem. I suspect they have something to do with running on VM (vendor doesn't recommend running on VM) but have no evidence to support it. When it crashes it creates dump file with just vague message saying the executable stopped running.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."

"It's a stable product without any bugs or glitches."

"The product seems stable enough."

"The solution is easier to use compared to the other solutions."

"The features that I have found most valuable are, first of all, that it comes as part of this whole bundle of Informatica tools. So if you've been implementing Informatica MDM across a business, you'd often find it comes with it. It's been thrown in as a sweetener. The adoption of it is often the challenge because as part of your MDM project, governance is seen as something beyond the MDM and is often restrictive. So this tool actually, for the first time, when you talk to data governance teams, gives a holistic view of what a data governance team can do with this tool."

"The program is stable and scalable."

"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."

"Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) pros

"Services for all manner of data-driven organizations, no matter their size or budget."

"It saves a huge amount of time. Before using this service, we used a vendor that manually ran our lists through this NCOA list, which might have taken one to three business days to return the file. This was a huge bottleneck in our process, and the data returned was not always accurate. After switching to Melissa Data’s SmartMover, the process has been reduced to between ten minutes and three hours, depending on the amount of records sent."

"Through more accurate data, our marketing department has been able to increase delivery and conversion rates through email direct marketing initiatives."

"By validating and parsing the addresses our customers submit to us, we have reduced the number of addressing errors encountered during our processing."

"It has a straightforward, easy setup."

"SSIS integration."

"We have only been using this for about two months, but it has sped up our processing significantly. It makes data mining easy and fast. We don't have to spend an entire month gathering correct information on leads. All we need is a list of home addresses, and in minutes we have names and phone numbers to increase our chance of these leads becoming customers."

"We like having the ability to write our own utilities/software to process our records and store the final output the way we want."

More Melissa Data Quality pros

Cons

"The main issue probably has nothing to do with end users, but installation can definitely be simplified."

"The integration process is not easy."

"Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve the price by making it less expensive."

"One thing Informatica could improve is the way IPUs are used. Each customer purchases a certain amount of IPUs per month, but you can use more or less than that defined quantity. The only problem is if you don't use the all your IPUs, they don't carry over into the next month. I think customers should have the ability to transfer unused IPUs into the next month or year. This improvement could help give customers more flexibility, especially since cloud solutions need flexibility in how we use and pay for them."

"The user interface can be a bit more functionality-aligned."

"It is complicated to establish the lineage in EDC using PowerCenter mappings."

"Managing the licenses with the on-premises version was difficult."

"It would be helpful if there was a GenAI feature integrated into the system, especially regarding the data quality."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) cons

"It would be nice if it also had a user interface, as it did in years past."

"It will mix up family members at times, so we will change addresses at times that shouldn’t be changed."

"If I had multiple Excel files open and ran Listware it would crash Excel, charge the credits, and not save the results."

"Address validation and parsing in a few countries have room for improvement."

"Tech support at Melissa Data was very quick to wash their hands of an issue and say it's IT policies on my side that are causing the issue. There was no offer to try and find a work-around. Just an overwhelming attitude of "it’s not our problem.""

"Needs better email append coverage (but every vendor struggles with this)."

"We have noticed that some of the emails and addresses return with confusing or incorrect codes, but for the most part, it is accurate."

"The SSIS component setup seems a little klunky."

More Melissa Data Quality cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not sure about the most recent pricing trends, but I don't believe it's significantly different from PowerCenter. I believe it is nearly the same."

"I have no idea what the price actually is. It is probably not going to be the cheapest, but it is a pretty stable and robust platform from the backend standpoint."

"There is no doubt that it is very expensive, but the brand value comes at a cost. Other MDM solutions in the market that haven't proven themselves like Informatica are also pretty expensive. We need to understand that MDM itself is very expensive to implement. So, Informatica is also pretty expensive. I would rate it a two out of five for being pretty expensive."

"The solution is very expensive."

"The platform has a premium cost. I rate the pricing as seven out of ten."

"Informatica MDM recently changed its pricing model. It's usage-based but I don't have much insight into the current pricing."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing nine and a half out of ten."

"Informatica Axon is a costly solution. I rate Informatica Axon a four out of ten for its pricing."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is very reasonable."

"It's affordable."

"Cloud version is very cheap. On-premise version is expensive."

"Melissa pricing is competitive."

"It is affordable."

"Trial subscriptions (via cloud) are very cheap and easy to use. It’s a great way to test Listware to see if you want to go deeper with integration."

"The only complaint that I have towards it is they sell licenses based on a range of usage, and I feel those ranges are too large."

"This vendor has no equal in pricing for equivalent functionality."

More Melissa Data Quality pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?

Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...

See all answers

What are the biggest benefits of using Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

When it comes to cloud data integration, this solution can provide you with multiple benefits, including: Overhead reduction by integrating data on any cloud in various ways Effective integration ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 5% of the time

Reltio Cloud vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 4% of the time

TIBCO EBX vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 4% of the time

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Competitors

Experian Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 33% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 20% of the time

Runner Technologies Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 18% of the time

More Melissa Data Quality Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

April 2025

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) report

Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) product report

Buyer's Guide

Melissa Data Quality

April 2025

Download Melissa Data Quality product report

Also Known As

ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, BPM, Address Verification, Persistent Data Masking, Cloud Test Data Management, PIM, , Enterprise Data Catalog, Data Integration Hub, Cloud Data Integration, Data Quality, Cloud API and App Integration

No data available

Overview

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is a robust platform used by banks, financial institutions, and health sector organizations for data management, governance, and compliance.

IDMC provides comprehensive tools for data discovery, profiling, masking, and transformation. It supports Salesforce integration, real-time data streaming, and scalable data management solutions. Health organizations manage national product catalogs while financial entities focus on data protection and regulatory compliance. Its intuitive interface, flexible features, and robust tools make it valuable across sectors, though enhancements in data integration and human workflow are being sought.

What are the most important features?

Data discovery: Facilitates identifying and understanding data sources.
Data profiling: Analyzes old databases for data quality.
Data and platform masking: Ensures data protection.
Salesforce integration: Seamless connectivity with Salesforce.
Mastering data: Centralizing and standardizing data.
UI intuitiveness: User-friendly interface.
Feature map flexibility: Adapts to user needs.
Business glossary creation: Defines business terms.
Data lineage: Tracks data flow and transformations.
Automation: Streamlines data processes.
Enterprise data cataloging: Organizes extensive data assets.
Scalability: Supports expanding data requirements.
Easy setup: Quick deployment process.
Bulk upload: Efficiently handles large data volumes.
Customizable data management: Tailors data solutions.
Real-time data streaming: Manages live data streams.
Integration with Hadoop and NoSQL: Connects with big data platforms.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Regulatory compliance: Ensures adherence to regulations.
Data protection: Safeguards sensitive information.
Enhanced data quality: Improves accuracy and reliability.
Centralized data: Consolidates data for better management.
Process automation: Reduces manual tasks and errors.

Banks and financial institutions use IDMC for data masking, transformation, and compliance, while health sector organizations leverage it for national product catalogs. Industry applications focus on automating business processes, centralizing data, and managing data catalogs to meet regulatory demands and ensure data protection.

Informatica

Data Quality Components for SSIS

This suite of data transformations for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) delivers the full spectrum of data quality including data profiling, data verification, data enrichment and data matching. With an intuitive interface and drag/drop capabilities, this powerful toolkit makes it easy to unify data into a single version of the truth for Master Data Management (MDM) success.

Melissa

Sample Customers

The Travel Company, Carbonite

Boeing Co., FedEx, Ford Motor Co, Hewlett Packard, Meade-Johnson, Microsoft, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, SAAB Cars USA, Sony, Walt Disney, Weight Watchers, and Intel.

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

April 2025

Free Report: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.