Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Intel Snap vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Intel Snap
Ranking in Server Monitoring
38th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zenoss Cloud
Ranking in Server Monitoring
24th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (34th), Event Monitoring (15th), Network Monitoring Software (72nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (59th), Container Monitoring (11th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Intel Snap is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Use Intel Snap?
Share your opinion
ClaudiaChen - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 7, 2022
Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features
As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."
"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."
"It depends on the customer, what he wants."
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.