INTELLIBOT vs Microsoft Power Automate comparison

"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."

"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."

"There's a helpful community available through the portal."

"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."

"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."

"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."

"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."

"Power Automate is not complex and is very easy-to-use in deploying most development projects."

"It helps with the feedback mechanism, where we need to determine the relevant team and obtain their email addresses."

"The solution is very easy to use. It's a code three platform that works very easily with documents to create custom automations."

"The connectors are a very good feature."

"It's not hard to learn, which means we'll be able to make more workflows in the future."

"It makes work easier."

"It servers our purposes in bringing together all types of applications, being able to automate them with the right intelligent output from the data that we plugin."

"The solution is relatively easy to use and cost-effective."

"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."

"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."

"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."

"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."

"The trigger actions need to be more robust."

"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."

"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."

"It should work better for Angular websites, as it has a lot of problems."

"Sometimes, Microsoft changes the game rules, and the free tools are no longer free, which makes it too hard to explain to customers. It is a SaaS service, so the cost is calculated based on the execution hours. However, we don't know the background of this cost because we cannot touch the infrastructure. They can be more open to developers or customers about this. The infrastructure part must be open for the customers."

"Sometimes it can be difficult to share flows for multiple users to edit."

"Better support is needed for building custom components on top of ProcessRobot."

"They should include a custom plugin feature so that we can add our custom connections."

"Automatic selectors that allow me to select parts of a website could be more adaptable."

"There are some bugs or intermittent behavior in the Excel activities that require using workarounds."

"When comparing with Automation Anywhere, there are a couple of things that this product doesn't have. One of the major things is the key management system. It would be great if they improve this. Its documentation can also be improved."

"It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year."

"The solution requires a license and we purchased one annually. We were satisfied with the price."

"INTELLIBOT with the DPA costs approximately $1,500 USD."

"At the time, one license was $5,000 USD. If we needed to negotiate for more licenses, we could negotiate a bit on the price."

"I give the cost a three out of ten."

"There is flexibility in pricing."

"Its licensing cost is comparatively less as compared to Automation Anywhere. We have bought a two-year license agreement."

"Microsoft is providing an automatic license with a cost of $20 million per month, which is reasonable."

"Due to the pricing model, the solution is more convenient than any other tools."

"The licensing cost for us at this time is between $8 and $20 per user, per month."

"This is a cost-effective product and now that it has been acquired by Microsoft, we don't expect the cost to increase with the next release."

"My company switched to a monthly payment for the WinAutomation by Softomotive license. I don't have the exact figure, but it roughly amounts to 500 Euros a year which isn't bad."