Intercede MyID vs Zilla Security comparison

Intercede and Zilla Security are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. Intercede is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while Zilla Security is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0. Intercede holds a 0.5% mindshare in IAM, compared to Zilla Security’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Intercede users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zilla Security users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Intercede MyID and Zilla Security compete in identity management, where Zilla Security is perceived as superior due to its comprehensive features offering greater value. Intercede MyID excels in pricing and support, attracting cost-sensitive organizations.

Features: Intercede MyID focuses on strong authentication management, credential issuance, and prioritizes security. Zilla Security provides rich access control capabilities, integration flexibility, and meets diverse organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Intercede MyID features straightforward deployment with strong setup support and personalized customer service. Zilla Security utilizes cloud-based deployment requiring more IT involvement, backed by extensive documentation and quick service response, aligning with dynamic environments.

Pricing and ROI: Intercede MyID has lower setup costs and favorable ROI when quick deployment and strong authentication are critical. Zilla Security's higher initial investment offers substantial long-term ROI through enhanced security and operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Intercede MyID vs. Zilla Security Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Intercede MyID vs. Zilla Security

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,960 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Omada Identity

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of Omada Identity is 3.3%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Intercede MyID is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zilla Security is 1.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Pernilla Hulth

IAM Project Manager (Independent) at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

The interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview

The cloud-based deployment was straightforward, but the on-prem deployment was in a highly complex ecosystem. Omada has matured since then. I wouldn't say that it isn't straightforward, but it depends on the customer. A standard deployment is relatively easy, but it can be more painful if you need a lot of customization. We deployed the cloud solution in around four months, nearly meeting the 12-week benchmark. The on-prem deployment took three years. It was a highly complex ecosystem that was dependent on other systems. Depending on the size of your environment, you need a product owner and some specialists for maintenance. My last customer was a university with a complex environment. They had around 12 people involved in maintenance at that organization. Typically, it's between 2-5 people.

Read full review

Robin Schechinger

Product Owner at Telekom Deutschland GmbH

A tool to encrypt and decrypt emails that can also be useful for general access management

I rate the initial setup process of Intercede MyID an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. The solution was deployed throughout the whole organization, meaning the solution was rolled out in my company, and that's it. The solution was deployed in a couple of days. Two people were required for the solution's deployment and maintenance phases.

Read full review

Hubert Hopkins

IT Compliance Analyst at The Baldwin Group

Reasonably priced, responsive support, and easy to implement access reviews

There is still no automated way to de-provision access due to a review completion, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. Right now it is just a one-way integration, importing user lists. I believe they working on it. I can pull a user list in, but when I do a review, the results get sent to a ticket which requires a person to execute. As a result of the review, there is no automation for the removal of access. They are going there, and the next step is to continue to streamline the process operationally and resource-wise. The review process is great. The scope for improvement is more at the results end. It would be great if it could systematically communicate with that end system and remove the requested access automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most is that we can always find a solution, and we can also find the cause when something goes wrong. I like that the most because everything is in one way or another traceable. That is what I like most. I like its reliability."

"Omada's user interface is elegant and easy to work with. I like Omada's ability to automatically generate accounts for new hires and allow them access to all required systems by established policies. Around 80 percent of workers can start working immediately on their first day without requesting further access."

"The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the sweet spot in the market for Omada is where things are heavy on governance."

"Surveying is a valuable feature because it allows us to import data and see who has access to what data, for example."

"User-friendly solution."

"The most valuable functionality of the solution for us is that when employees stop working for the municipality, they are automatically disabled in Active Directory. Omada controls that 100 percent. They are disabled for 30 days, and after that time Omada deletes the Active Directory account. The same type of thing happens when we employ a new person. Their information is automatically imported to Omada and they are equipped with the roles and rights so they can do their jobs."

"It has a very user-friendly interface compared to what we are used to, and it is highly configurable. In the old solution, when we needed to do something, we had to have a programmer sitting next to us, whereas, in Omada Identity, everything is configurable."

"Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process."

More Omada Identity pros

"The feature for signing documents is important to me."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the access management."

"I enjoy the ease of setup and creation of a review. Being a user of the tool or kind of an admin of the tool, the ease of setup of an access review is valuable."

"We had these spreadsheets all over the place, but now we have a library of evidence to consult when needed. Zilla keeps everything in one place. It's not scattered all over anymore."

Cons

"What I would most like to see added to the product is role management, especially enterprise or business role management, and the processes around that."

"If you find an error and you need it fixed, you have to upgrade. It's not like they say, "Okay, we'll fix this problem for you." You have to upgrade. The last time we upgraded, because there was an error in a previous version, we had to pay 150,000 Danish Krone (about $24,000 at the time of this review) to upgrade our systems... That means that we have to pay to get errors fixed that Omada has made in programming the system. I hope they change this way of looking at things."

"Omada Identity has a steep learning curve."

"The architecture of the entire system should also be less complex. The way they process the data is complex."

"I would like more training. As someone who is new to this world, I don't feel that the courses Omada provides are good enough. They should also improve the documentation. It is difficult to learn how to use the solution by yourself"

"Omada's reporting functionality is limited and could benefit from greater customization."

"They need to improve the cost for small companies."

"The security permission inside Omada needs improvement. It's tricky to set up."

More Omada Identity cons

"Reporting features would be a good addition to Intercede MyID, as it is one of the areas where the solution lacks."

"I'm not sure whether the solution has a mobile version or mobile dashboard, but that would be nice."

"Maybe this is coming with their AI module, but I would like to see a feature that performs baseline analysis of permissions that may not fit into a role, and it attempts to group them into a role. We've run into problems with applications where someone has not created a role but assigned ad hoc permissions to a user. We still need to do some manual work to identify the group that the user belongs to. It would be amazing to have Zilla streamline that."

"There is still no automated way to de-provision access as a result of a review, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. They are getting closer to that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My client deals directly with the Omada Identity team in terms of licensing. I never look at pricing, so I'm not aware of how much the solution costs, but it's worth the money. Often, when you begin to use Omada Identity and it takes a while to set up, it'll be irreversible, and you'd depend on and focus more on the functionality of the solution, rather than its price tag."

"It is not cheap. It is expensive, but compared to what we did almost three years ago, it is value for money. It is worth it."

"It is expensive. Fortunately, I had a very good procurement manager on my side, but they are expensive. The closest competitors are also very expensive. You get a full-fledged solution that can do everything you dream of, but you pay for everything."

"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high."

"The pricing is too high for SMBs."

"Being Dutch, I can only say that it is extremely expensive, but all software products are expensive. If you have 38,000 users, then even one dollar or one euro per person would amount to a significant amount of money. Because of the high number of users, anything gets expensive very fast here."

"It is not cheap. None of these solutions are cheap, but we have good pricing at least for now from a licensing perspective."

"Omada is too expensive. We are in the automotive industry. The pricing might be high because most of the other customers are in the insurance or banking sectors, but it's steep for an auto supply company."

More Omada Identity pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factors for us to purchase it at the time. It was reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

25%

Government

19%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Security Firm

31%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Omada Identity Cloud?

As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configur...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Omada Identity Cloud?

They are positioned at a good price point. They are lower than some of their competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Identity Cloud?

The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Intercede MyID?

The most valuable feature of the solution is the access management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Intercede MyID?

Reporting features would be a good addition to Intercede MyID, as it is one of the areas where the solution lacks.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Intercede MyID?

I use Intercede MyID in my company to encrypt and decrypt emails and for general access management along with identit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?

It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an iden...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zilla Security?

There is still no automated way to de-provision access due to a review completion, but they are getting there in term...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?

We use the tool for access reviews. It is mainly for our regulatory SOX compliance. That was the main use case, and w...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Omada Identity

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Omada Identity

Compared 22% of the time

Saviynt vs Omada Identity

Compared 17% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Omada Identity

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Identity Management vs Omada Identity

Compared 6% of the time

More Omada Identity Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Intercede MyID

Compared 100% of the time

More Intercede MyID Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Zilla Security

Compared 61% of the time

Veza vs Zilla Security

Compared 25% of the time

Lumos vs Zilla Security

Compared 14% of the time

More Zilla Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Omada Identity

March 2025

Download Omada Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

March 2025

Download Intercede MyID product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

March 2025

Download Zilla Security product report

Also Known As

Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud

MyID

No data available

Overview

Omada Identity is an identity governance and administration (IGA) solution designed to help organizations manage and secure digital identities and access across their IT environments. It focuses on enhancing security, compliance, and efficiency by automating identity management processes.

Omada Identity offers a robust set of features that streamline identity lifecycle management, access governance, and compliance reporting. It integrates with a wide range of IT systems, applications, and data sources, providing a centralized platform for managing user identities and access rights. The solution enables organizations to enforce security policies, ensure regulatory compliance, and reduce the risk of unauthorized access.

What are the critical features of Omada Identity?

Identity Lifecycle Management: Automates the process of creating, updating, and deactivating user identities throughout their lifecycle.
Access Governance: Ensures that users have appropriate access rights, enabling continuous monitoring and recertification of access.
Compliance Reporting: Provides comprehensive reporting capabilities to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements.
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Simplifies the assignment and management of access rights based on user roles within the organization.
Self-Service Access Requests: Empowers users to request access to resources through a user-friendly portal, reducing administrative burden.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems, applications, and data sources for unified identity and access management.

What benefits or ROI items should users look for in the reviews when evaluating Omada Identity?

Improved Security: By ensuring that only authorized users have access to sensitive information, Omada Identity enhances overall security posture.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing detailed audit trails and reporting features.
Operational Efficiency: Automates routine identity management tasks, reducing manual effort and freeing up IT resources for strategic initiatives.
User Productivity: Streamlines access management processes, enabling users to quickly obtain the resources they need to perform their jobs.
Reduced Risk: Minimizes the risk of data breaches and insider threats by enforcing strict access controls and continuous monitoring.

Omada Identity is widely adopted across various industries, including healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. In healthcare, it helps protect patient data and comply with regulations like HIPAA. In finance, it ensures compliance with SOX and other financial regulations. In manufacturing, it secures access to sensitive production data and intellectual property.

Pricing and licensing for Omada Identity are typically based on the number of users and the specific features required. Customer support is available through various channels, including online resources, support tickets, and professional services for implementation and customization.

In summary, Omada Identity is a comprehensive IGA solution that enhances security, compliance, and efficiency in managing digital identities and access.

Omada

MyID software enables PKI-based credentials to be issued and lifecycle managed across , smart cards, USB tokens, smartphones, virtual smart cards and more. Software that is trusted by governments and large enterprises to manage credentials across millions of citizens and employees using secure, seamless multi-factor authentication.

Intercede

Zilla enables you to maintain a secure and compliant posture for identity and access across your attack surface.
We bring all your digital services into one unified identity security solution – even your apps with no security APIs. We put you in control and prevent identity and access breaches.
Zilla enables you to maintain a secure and compliant posture for identity and access across your attack surface.
We bring all your digital services into one unified identity security solution – even your apps with no security APIs. We put you in control and prevent identity and access breaches.

Zilla Security

Sample Customers

Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group, BMW Group, Deutsche Leasing

Wells Fargo, Boeing, Airbus, United Health Group, U.S. Social Security Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kuwait Government

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Intercede MyID vs. Zilla Security

March 2025

Free Report: Intercede MyID vs. Zilla Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Intercede MyID vs. Zilla Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Intercede MyID vs. Zilla Security report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.