Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ipanema IpIengine vs WAAS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Ipanema IpIengine
Ranking in WAN Optimization
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WAAS
Ranking in WAN Optimization
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the WAN Optimization category, the mindshare of Ipanema IpIengine is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WAAS is 4.0%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
WAN Optimization
 

Featured Reviews

it_user140664 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 20, 2014
We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start.
Dynamic WAN selection, Dynamic QoS Making use of two connections per site we were able to minimize expensive MPLS connections and replace them with cheap internet lines with IPsec tunnels. Business critical applications are going over MPLS, less critical via IPsec ensuring the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

IpIengine
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Dimension Data, National Rugby League
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.