Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ipanema IpIengine vs WAAS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Ipanema IpIengine's customer service is highly praised for its responsiveness, helpfulness, knowledgeable staff, and effective problem-solving.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Ipanema IpIengine needs improved stability, consistent performance, better support responsiveness, and more intuitive features for ease of use.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Ipanema IpIengine is praised for scalability, efficiency, seamless integration, robust architecture, and adaptability, though optimization tools are suggested.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
<p>Ipanema IpIengine provides flexible, cost-effective pricing with a tiered model suitable for various enterprise deployment scales and needs.</p>
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Ipanema IpIengine is praised for its stability, reliability under heavy traffic, minimal downtime, and advanced error-free functionality.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Ipanema IpIengine boosts network performance with dynamic path selection, application monitoring, load balancing, easy integration, and robust security.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Ipanema IpIengine
Ranking in WAN Optimization
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WAAS
Ranking in WAN Optimization
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the WAN Optimization category, the mindshare of Ipanema IpIengine is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WAAS is 4.0%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
WAN Optimization
 

Featured Reviews

it_user140664 - PeerSpot reviewer
We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start.
Dynamic WAN selection, Dynamic QoS Making use of two connections per site we were able to minimize expensive MPLS connections and replace them with cheap internet lines with IPsec tunnels. Business critical applications are going over MPLS, less critical via IPsec ensuring the…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

IpIengine
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Dimension Data, National Rugby League
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, HPE Aruba Networking, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.