We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"The most valuable feature is how it scanned and detected through its database to let us know exactly what fixes we needed to put in place for the vulnerabilities. It detects and it also gives you the way to fix it."
"The automatic scanner and scheduler are pretty cool."
"I find the features that are most valuable are the policies that help us identify the vulnerabilities. These policies are then used for scanning instabilities and then identifying the particular vulnerabilities."
"The product's most valuable features are vulnerability and asset management. It can define the rules and validate the configuration."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the dashboard. They are convenient to use."
"The results are not that bad, but the key selling point is that it is an affordable tool set."
"Tenable Nessus is cheap and flexible."
"The most valuable features of Tenable Nessus are the scanning option. Advanced scanning is highly useful. The offline config audits and application assessments are useful."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"The scalability of Tenable Nessus is good. However, it could be more flexible."
"Tenable Nessus could improve the price."
"The problems I faced with Tenable Nessus were related to its dashboard's customization capabilities and its ability to provide data to third-party sources."
"This is still a maturing product. Tenable is only a scanner for one ability, while other solutions like Rapid7 have more tools for verification. We still have to manually verify to see if the vulnerability is a false positive or not."
"It would be a good idea if they have a simulation of attacks or a use case for finding a new vulnerability or dealing with a zero-day attack."
"The price and scalability of the solution could improve."
"We feel the solution's technical support to be very bad."
"Lacks some penetration testing-related services."
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 45th in Vulnerability Management while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM and Brinqa, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Security Center and Pentera.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.