Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

Ivanti and Qualys are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0, while Qualys is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9. Ivanti holds a 0.5% mindshare in PM, compared to Qualys’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Qualys users who would recommend it.
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...
Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac reviews
  • 226 Views
  • 104 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Qualys Patch Management
Read 33 Qualys Patch Management reviews
  • 825 Views
  • 363 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and Qualys Patch Management compete in patch management solutions. Users rate Ivanti higher for pricing and customer support, whereas Qualys is preferred for its features and perceived value.

Features: Ivanti is noted for its comprehensive patching capabilities across multiple OS environments, seamless integrations, and extensive automation. Qualys is recognized for its in-depth vulnerability analysis, cloud-based architecture, and automated reporting.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti could enhance its scalability, improve patching speed for larger environments, and refine user interface design. Qualys needs better offline patching support, more granular control in scheduling patches, and enhanced integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti has a straightforward deployment process and dedicated customer support leading to quicker setups and effective troubleshooting. Qualys offers a cloud-based deployment, simplifying installation but causing occasional issues with remote customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti offers competitive pricing and quicker ROI due to reasonable setup costs and efficiency gains in patch management. Qualys is more expensive but is viewed as a valuable investment for its advanced features and comprehensive coverage. Ivanti is budget-friendly, while Qualys provides high value for its cost.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Qualys Patch Management Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Qualys Patch Management
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...
Ranking in Patch Management
15th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qualys Patch Management
Ranking in Patch Management
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 4.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Mario Del Toro - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to manage the accesses for the users, provide specific permissions, and verify identities
I use the solution to manage the accesses for the users, provide specific permissions, and verify identities.  The tool is a stable product.  The tool needs to improve its visual system.  I would rate the product's stability a ten out of ten.  I would rate the solution's scalability a nine out…
Read full review
Revathi VeeraRaghavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a centralized platform for managing assets and vulnerabilities, enabling assessment, prioritization, and remediation
Qualys Patch Management system requires several improvements. Firstly, the inability to download asset patches and the lack of third-party application integration limit patch accessibility. Additionally, rollback options are unreliable, and pre-deployment patch testing is crucial. Reporting needs enhancement, particularly with group-based compliance percentages and clearer, VMDR-like reporting in the Patch Management module. Furthermore, detection speed should be improved, as patches are released 24 hours after QIDs are published. The user interface could be more functional, with dashboards for patch compliance visualization and simplified error code language. Finally, the Mac patch catalogue needs expansion, and automated workflows, policy enforcement, and testing procedures should be streamlined for seamless, user-independent operation.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to implement."
"The tool is a stable product."
"Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."
"The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The integration of Qualys Gateway Scanner is my favorite feature. The patches our downloaded to QGS in our environment and deployed, saving bandwidth. The patch logging and policies have been helpful. The dashboard shows you when the patch has been applied to your assets."
"Qualys Patch Management significantly improved our patch rates by 80 percent, scanning for vulnerabilities every four hours via the Qualys agent."
"Automated features streamline patch deployment and ensure compliance, effectively mitigating risks and bolstering organizational security."
"Qualys Patch Management streamlines our vulnerability management process by providing a single source of truth to assess, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities across all assets."
"The most valuable features of Qualys Patch Management include its ability to automate patch deployment for hundreds or thousands of assets, reducing our reliance on the IT team to perform these tasks manually."
"The consolidated report we received from the solution was very time-saving because, in the dashboard, we could get all the patch details for a particular patch and all the assets listed."
"Customer service is exceptional."
"The most valuable feature in Patch Management is the Qualys query language for set-it-and-forget-it patching for our preapproved patches, and our preapproved schedules, That is extremely helpful compared to the old days of patching."
More Qualys Patch Management pros
 

Cons

"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."
"The tool needs to improve its visual system."
"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."
"Downloading extensive vulnerability reports, especially those with millions of entries, is time-consuming. To improve efficiency, Qualys should implement faster download speeds and offer reports in Excel format in addition to the current CSV option."
"There is a limitation where Qualys may not always offer solutions for remediation, particularly for end-of-life or end-of-service applications."
"Its implementation is too recent to make any judgments about areas needing improvement. In terms of pricing, of course, it is not free. Cheaper is always better."
"A common area for improvement in Patch Management, both within our environment and others I've encountered, is the lack of built-in driver updates."
"The patch status and patch completion information should be improved. If a patch fails due to some reason, such as a Windows error, the error code that gets published should be more detailed."
"One area for improvement in Qualys Patch Management is knowing whether patches have been completely downloaded in a particular QGS appliance."
"A patch contract is a bundle of patches that we are going to roll out. I would like to reference those patches from separate jobs. They explained at a conference that it cannot be done, but that is my main complaint. I wish that the whole schema was a little bit clearer because there is a little bit of cloudiness around it."
"The pricing of the solution is slightly high compared to other tools in our field."
More Qualys Patch Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing."
"Qualys Patch Management comes as part of a bundled package with several modules, making it a cost-effective deal for us."
"Qualys Patch Management's pricing is competitive."
"The licensing cost is more than 2,000 for the whole Americas region"
"Qualys is fairly priced."
"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."
"Qualys Patch Management is expensive."
"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."
"I'm unaware of Qualys' exact price, but it's more expensive than Nessus. With technological products, you need to pay to get the best."
More Qualys Patch Management pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac?
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac?
The solution is not expensive. It is cheaper than other solutions. The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac?
The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part. Currently, on Amazon AWS, we have hosted all the websites. It is fine to migrate f...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?
Qualys Patch Management comes as part of a bundled package with several modules, making it a cost-effective deal for us. I cannot speak to the separate cost, as we have always used it as part of th...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?
I deploy patches to endpoints and servers every month. However, despite a job showing as successful, I need to examine the job in detail. For instance, if I have deployed patches to 100 endpoints, ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?
I use Qualys Patch Management as a single platform for patch management. We have Microsoft, Adobe, and various other apps. I create a scheduled task to push all the required patches to the laptops ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 24% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 15% of the time
Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 13% of the time
Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 11% of the time
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 11% of the time
More Qualys Patch Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
March 2025
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac reportDownload Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac product report
Buyer's Guide
Qualys Patch Management
March 2025
Qualys Patch Management reportDownload Qualys Patch Management product report
 

Also Known As

HEAT Patch, PatchLink
No data available
 

Overview

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, powered by Heat, swiftly detects vulnerabilities in today’s environment, from workstation to data center. And it deploys expertly pretested patches automatically, helping organizations to patch with more efficiency and efficacy.

Ivanti

Qualys Patch Management optimizes patching and vulnerability remediation through automation and intelligence insights, accelerating the process by 43% and improving patch rates by 90%. Its integration with CMDB and ITSM tools speeds up ticket closures by 60%, effectively reducing the attack surface while freeing IT and security resources. This cloud-based solution bridges the IT-security gap, making it essential for cybersecurity.

Qualys
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Qualys Patch Management
March 2025
Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Qualys Patch Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Qualys Patch Management report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.