Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

Microsoft and Qualys are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Qualys is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qualys users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 80 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 4,919 Views
  • 3,894 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
Qualys Patch Management
Read 24 Qualys Patch Management reviews
  • 410 Views
  • 252 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Qualys Patch Management compete in system and patch management. Microsoft Configuration Manager seems to have an upper hand in centralized management, while Qualys Patch Management is stronger in automation and real-time updates.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers software and application deployment, integrated Microsoft patching with WSUS, OS deployment, and a centralized system management console. Users can manage mobile devices and benefit from remote control capabilities. Qualys Patch Management is highly valued for its automation capabilities in patching both first-party and third-party applications, comprehensive vulnerability management features, and real-time information updates.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could improve CPU and memory usage, integration with multiple Intune subscriptions, and patching for non-Microsoft products. Users desire more intuitive troubleshooting and reporting. Qualys Patch Management could benefit from integrating driver updates, enhancing support for virtualized environments, and providing more detailed reporting and quicker resolutions for zero-day vulnerabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager is primarily deployed on-premises and offers comprehensive documentation, though users report mixed experiences with technical support, citing both high quality and slow, tiered assistance. Qualys Patch Management supports cloud and hybrid models and generally receives positive feedback for its customer service, though it can be expensive with calls for better support and broader application compatibility.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager is seen as costly, mainly due to licensing and infrastructure needs, but often provides good ROI through its integration within Microsoft ecosystems and automation benefits. Qualys Patch Management is also viewed as expensive compared to competitors, although its pricing becomes more competitive at scale, with users wishing for expanded features and improved support.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (3rd), Configuration Management (3rd)
Qualys Patch Management
Ranking in Patch Management
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Abul Fazal - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable
The initial setup for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is simple. However, the configuration and management are not simple. Most of my clients are using the on-premise configuration. Cloud deployment is cumbersome because It requires lots of system communication to open from the cloud, and every client has to communicate with the cloud. We follow the Microsoft best practices procedure and white papers for implementation. Which includes single and multiple server deployments. The time it takes for deployment depends on the client's environment, such as the configuration and customization needed. However, the process can typically take two to three weeks to complete.
Read full review
Brad Mathis - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps simplify patching, integrates well, and reduces costs
A common area for improvement in Patch Management, both within our environment and others I've encountered, is the lack of built-in driver updates. Ideally, the system would handle updates for network interface cards, video cards, and other components, eliminating the need to rely on manufacturer-specific tools like Dell Update or HP Update. Integrating these patching options would significantly improve the overall functionality. Qualys Patch Management primarily updates operating systems, third-party software including Adobe products and many more, leaving video card drivers and firmware updates to other tools. This focus on core software is understandable, as driver and firmware updates can be more complex. The price has room for improvement.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system."
"It's helped us solve problems surrounding patching, installing, and reporting different patches, etc., on the virtual machines."
"The product is very stable compared to older versions."
"The solution is stable."
"The scalability to deploy the package."
"Automation of operating system, application, and update deployments massively reduces IT operations effort."
"This solution captures all the devices in our infrastructure."
"The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
"We have all the information on one page. The dashboard provides comprehensive information on one page, making it easy to apply patches and monitor pending updates."
"The integration of Qualys Gateway Scanner is my favorite feature. The patches our downloaded to QGS in our environment and deployed, saving bandwidth. The patch logging and policies have been helpful. The dashboard shows you when the patch has been applied to your assets."
"Patch Management, if configured correctly, works effectively without requiring further action."
"Qualys Patch Management helps reduce our client's organizational risk by 50 percent."
"Compared to other tools, Qualys is better due to its automation capabilities, which allow us to achieve high compliance rates."
"Qualys Patch Management streamlines our vulnerability management process by providing a single source of truth to assess, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities across all assets."
"The most valuable features are the ease of managing both first-party and third-party patching, the generation of dashboards, and the provision of real-time information."
"Patch Management's most valuable feature is the ability to search for vulnerabilities using their QID."
More Qualys Patch Management pros
 

Cons

"There is no asset management package included."
"The reports are too busy. They could be simpler. I'm a technician, so I don't care how pretty the reports look. They should be easy to read. I'm designing this for production folks. They need to read the reports quickly when they're patching in the middle of the night."
"The App to upgrades to the server needs to be improved."
"It would be better if reporting were more user-friendly. I would like to see an upgrade in the reporting structure in the next release. At the moment, you have to use an SQL query or configure it to pull reports through the graphical user interface. Their updates could be more regular. I think Mircosoft updates it every six months. They are also moving many things to Intune, and Microsoft decided to move the deployment solution there. I think SCCM is getting old, and Intune is new."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."
"The cost of the product can be improved."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could improve the integration."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
"Qualys's current response time for releasing solutions to zero-day vulnerabilities, which takes approximately 12 to 16 hours, needs improvement."
"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch."
"Downloading extensive vulnerability reports, especially those with millions of entries, is time-consuming."
"Currently, there are limitations in downloading patch jobs to view all associated assets and patch statuses."
"The GUI has areas that need improvement, particularly in the accuracy of results when adding dashboards and running queries."
"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch. It is not intuitive, and there should be clearer indicators or buttons to access this information easily."
"There are certain integration parts that could be improved. Sometimes, legacy operating systems are not supported by Qualys Patch Management, which is an issue."
"Qualys could improve its randomized download feature and provide more detailed information about patch failures, including the reason for failure."
More Qualys Patch Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is not a license needed to use the solution."
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
"Microsoft provides a steep price for their enterprise products, but they offer very competitive pricing for their legacy customers."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for."
"There is an annual license needed to use the solution."
"Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing."
"The price could be better."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
"Compared to other tools, the price of Qualys Patch Management is reasonable."
"Its price is competitive in the market. Compared to other solutions like Rapid7, Qualys offers a favorable price point and robust features."
"From what I have heard, Qualys Patch Management is pricey, which is a main barrier to entry. Another aspect that I do not like about Qualys is that they do not add new patch management functionalities to the existing package. It is a separate SKU, so you have to pay more money."
"Qualys is fairly priced."
"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."
"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."
"The pricing is reasonable and less expensive than the previous tool."
"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."
More Qualys Patch Management pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?
Pricing is on the higher side. We found it costly compared to other vendors.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?
It would be beneficial to have more efficiently scheduled task deployments that are tailored to specific asset types or deployment needs.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?
We use Qualys Patch Management to detect open vulnerabilities and manage patches.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 8% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 6% of the time
AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 30% of the time
Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 13% of the time
Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 12% of the time
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Qualys Patch Management Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Qualys Patch Management
Compared 8% of the time
More Qualys Patch Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
December 2024
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Qualys Patch Management
November 2024
Qualys Patch Management reportDownload Qualys Patch Management product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
No data available
 

Learn More

Microsoft
Qualys
 

Overview

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

Qualys Patch Management optimizes patching and vulnerability remediation through automation and intelligence insights, accelerating the process by 43% and improving patch rates by 90%. Its integration with CMDB and ITSM tools speeds up ticket closures by 60%, effectively reducing the attack surface while freeing IT and security resources. This cloud-based solution bridges the IT-security gap, making it essential for cybersecurity.

 

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management
December 2024
Free Report: Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.