Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (2nd), Configuration Management (3rd)
Qualys Patch Management
Ranking in Patch Management
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

HuaLiu - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 6, 2023
Automatically apply patches, is stable, and scalable
The primary use case of the solution is to deploy patches, and applications, and upgrade our client operating systems Without the solution, we would have to manually install all patches and software and upgrade our operating system with the help of our support team, which would take a long time.…
Yuvaraaj Adhithya - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 20, 2024
User-friendly and scalable but needs better support and more features
The Qualys Scanning tool is one of the best tools for scanning purposes, virus detection, and vulnerability detection, whereas Qualys Patch Management is helpful only in a few cases, not in all cases. There are multiple tools for patching, such as SCCM, Intune, or Ivanti. One of the challenges that we have faced with the Patch Management tool is that you cannot patch all the things. There are some limitations, whereas, in SCCM, we can create a package and just deploy that through it. Anything is deployable through SCCM, whereas Patch Management is very selective. They should support more applications. For example, you cannot push a patch on Oracle. There is not much automation. For example, with SCCM, you can push anything, but that is not the case with Qualys. We have faced a few corruptions while patching. Even though a patch is feasible through Qualys Patch Management, when we try to push it to our servers, we face some errors or interruptions. When we push the patch, something gets blocked and the patch fails. Even if the patch is within the directory of Qualys, we cannot push it. There are some errors. The Qualys support team can be more communicative. Just sharing a knowledge-based article does not help all the clients or all people. A knowledge-based article might be useful for a technical person, but it does not help someone who is not very technical. They should have a call-based approach. Even companies like Microsoft provide an option for a call for a support case, which allows you to discuss the issue and troubleshoot it quickly. Qualys should improve their support.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"SCCM does everything from A to Z for a Windows operating system."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution."
"It is easy to install, and quick to deploy."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to learn."
"The initial setup is fairly straightforward."
"The solution has a very good set of features."
"It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer."
"The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging."
"The most valuable feature in Patch Management is the Qualys query language for set-it-and-forget-it patching for our preapproved patches, and our preapproved schedules, That is extremely helpful compared to the old days of patching."
"For a few applications, you do not need to go and download the patches from the network or somewhere else. They have the patches or the latest updates in the directory. You can just select a patch and deploy it to a server. You can create a patch job and select the patch. Everything is within the interface. You do not need to go out of it."
 

Cons

"In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."
"The App to upgrades to the server needs to be improved."
"The solution does not support remote devices so the CMG is still required."
"Could do with some cosmetic improvements on the user interface."
"With Microsoft Premier Support, you get what you pay for. There's Third Tier Support that you pay for. If you pay for that, you get excellent support, and if you don't pay for that, then you get the less experienced staff."
"Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell."
"In spite of us being a premier customer we find the support unsatisfactory."
"This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections."
"One of the challenges that we have faced with the Patch Management tool is that you cannot patch all the things. There are some limitations, whereas, in SCCM, we can create a package and just deploy that through it. Anything is deployable through SCCM, whereas Patch Management is very selective."
"A common area for improvement in Patch Management, both within our environment and others I've encountered, is the lack of built-in driver updates."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution operates on a licensing model that can be expensive."
"There is not a license needed to use the solution."
"Its licensing is quite complicated because we are getting the license not only for SCCM but for the full Microsoft package. We don't need to pay for a separate license. We need to have one license that includes everything we need, such as Windows, Microsoft 365, SCCM, encryption, and so on. So, we don't have a specific price for it. Perhaps, it is good that it includes the full suite of licensing of Microsoft. It is expensive, but we are getting a lot of features."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"As far as I know, it is an annual operating expense license."
"The price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is expensive."
"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."
"I would rate the cost as eight out of ten."
"Qualys Patch Management's pricing is competitive."
"It is affordable, but they should provide features as per the rate they are charging. We have a big infrastructure with about 80,000 licenses. We expect better support from the Qualys team. So, it is affordable, but more features should be there, and the support should be better."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
806,727 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Wholesaler/Distributor
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?
It is affordable, but they should provide features as per the rate they are charging. We have a big infrastructure with about 80,000 licenses. We expect better support from the Qualys team. So, it ...
What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?
The Qualys Scanning tool is one of the best tools for scanning purposes, virus detection, and vulnerability detection, whereas Qualys Patch Management is helpful only in a few cases, not in all cas...
What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?
Qualys has a scanning tool for viruses, vulnerability, and malware detections. They recently launched Qualys Patch Management for patching applications or server sites. We previously used tools lik...
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
806,727 professionals have used our research since 2012.