Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JIRA Service Management vs Kaseya Vorex comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Service Management
Ranking in Help Desk Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
IT Service Management (ITSM) (2nd)
Kaseya Vorex
Ranking in Help Desk Software
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Help Desk Software category, the mindshare of JIRA Service Management is 9.7%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Vorex is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Help Desk Software
 

Featured Reviews

Karim Yousef - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently track and document projects with seamless tool integration
We are a management warehouse that provides services to different customers in different sectors. Primarily, we serve the banking sector and the military sector. We manage all the software delivery projects through tools such as JIRA Service Management or TFS Confluence is a great tool for…
reviewer2338638 - PeerSpot reviewer
Generates comprehensive system status updates for trend analysis, but the customization features need enhancement
The adoption of Kaseya has significantly enhanced our IT service and delivery management compared to our previous reliance on Excel-based processes. The transition has provided us with essential reports on resource utilization. Additionally, the platform generates comprehensive status updates on open tickets and allows for trend analysis. The product does not provide automation features. We have to integrate third-party tools for automatic ticketing. Its reporting capabilities could be enhanced as well. I rate it a six out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use JIRA Service Management for tracking purposes, planning, and execution."
"It's a good experience."
"The most valuable feature of JIRA Service Management is a plugin we are using for the front end for simple user forms."
"Provides excellent management features."
"Easy to use and user-friendly."
"The centralized feature allows us to track test cases and integrate with automation and bug fixing."
"We have an Agile environment and using Jira makes it easy to adhere to Agile best practices."
"Its integration is most valuable. It is pretty open for integration."
"The platform's most valuable feature is the ability to produce daily summary reports."
 

Cons

"I think the performance can be better."
"If we can have an easier way to deploy this solution without the help of a consultant and a more reliable way of deploying procedures, it would be quite helpful."
"It should be easier to log in."
"It is difficult to navigate if you don't have any prior knowledge."
"The initial setup of JIRA Service Management can be complex for new users. There is a lot of configuration."
"The product does not have the capability to sort queued tickets by product. This would be useful in making workflows more efficient."
"The customizations in Jira could be improved by being simplified. They are currently very complex."
"JIRA Service Management could include more AI features."
"Kaseya Vorex's customization features could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is free for us because we are an associate partner for the product."
"We need a license because we have a higher number than the free part."
"It is a cheaply priced product."
"JIRA Service Desk has different pricing as it is based on agents. On average, the price is about $300 per agent."
"I rate Service Management four out of 10 for affordability. The price could be better, especially for companies using more than one Atlassian product. It's suitable for SMBs that can afford it. I don't think there's another tool that's both better and cheaper. All help desk tools are relatively expensive."
"It costs around $150 to $200 per user."
"JIRA Service Management's pricing is pretty decent compared to competitors. I rate the pricing an eight to nine on a scale of one to ten."
"On a scale of one to five, with one being really high and five being good, I would rate the price of this solution as a four."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaseya Vorex?
The platform's most valuable feature is the ability to produce daily summary reports.
What needs improvement with Kaseya Vorex?
Kaseya Vorex's customization features could be better. They could provide training programs to predict the potential issues.
What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Vorex?
The adoption of Kaseya has significantly enhanced our IT service and delivery management compared to our previous reliance on Excel-based processes. The transition has provided us with essential re...
 

Also Known As

JIRA Service Desk
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada
CROWD, GetApp, Capterra, Software Advice
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, ManageEngine and others in Help Desk Software. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.