Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JIRA Service Management vs NICE CXone comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
JIRA Service Management receives mixed reviews for customer support, praised for responsiveness but hampered by time zone delays.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
JIRA Service Management needs improvements in integration, customization, user experience, and affordability to better serve large organizations.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
JIRA Service Management is flexible and scalable, meeting diverse needs, though large deployments may require better infrastructure or licenses.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.8
JIRA Service Management offers competitive pricing starting at $10-$25 per user, with volume discounts but potential cost increases.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
JIRA Service Management is stable and reliable, with minimal issues, consistently rated high for efficient project handling.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
JIRA Service Management enhances task management with customization, automation, collaboration, and comprehensive reporting for small to mid-size organizations.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Service Management
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (2nd), IT Service Management (ITSM) (2nd)
NICE CXone
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Workforce Engagement Management (4th), IVR Systems (3rd), Knowledge Management Software (7th), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

JIRA Service Management and NICE CXone aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. JIRA Service Management is designed for IT Service Management (ITSM) and holds a mindshare of 11.4%, down 12.0% compared to last year.
NICE CXone, on the other hand, focuses on Workforce Engagement Management, holds 10.7% mindshare, up 8.9% since last year.
IT Service Management (ITSM)
Workforce Engagement Management
 

Featured Reviews

Shambuling-Doni - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, offers good stability and visibility for operational efficiency
The search function could be improved. We have to search a certain way. There is no generic search, it is more object-oriented search. The interface could also be more user-friendly. So, the interface and search could be improved. Additionally, I would like to see more accessibility. It would also be great if there was a Jira mobile app.
James Arvidson - PeerSpot reviewer
A software that enables centers to operate more efficiently, increase the quality of every customer interaction, create new pathways to profit, and ensure ongoing customer-centric business improvemen
One of the best aspects of CXone is its omnichannel experience. It treats all contacts, whether phone, chat, email, or SMS, through the same system, allowing for consistent reporting and a true omnichannel experience. The platform is very flexible. You can customize it to do almost anything as long as it's based on logic, which has been incredibly valuable. In terms of analytics, CXone offers consistent, accessible data across all channels. In the past, different systems like Avaya for phones or separate platforms for chat and email made it hard to compare performance across channels. With CXone, you get the same data points across all interactions, making decision-making much easier. It also allows for deeper reporting, like IVR reporting, where you can see what options people choose and create custom KPIs for better insight.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JIRA Service Management?
JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?
The pricing for Jira Service Management is reasonable and not expensive. It feels fair because there are opportunities for discounts through resellers.
What needs improvement with NICE CXone?
One area where CXone could improve is in creating a more streamlined, user-friendly interface. While the interfaces are good, they can get a bit dated over time, though NICE is usually good about u...
What is your primary use case for NICE CXone?
I chose NICE CXone because it had the best return on investment and could scale effectively. After setting it up, I was so impressed that I went to work for NICE for three years, implementing their...
What advice do you have for others considering NICE CXone?
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
 

Also Known As

JIRA Service Desk
NICE inContact, NICE CXone Workforce Optimization Pro, NICE CXOne WFO Pro, CXone Workforce Optimization, inContact Workforce Optimization, CallCopy cc: Discover, cc: Discover, VPI Empower, Brand Embassy
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada
MoneyGram, Honeywell, Radisson Hotel Group, AAA, New Balance, MattressFIRM, Teleflora, Best Buy
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in IT Service Management (ITSM). Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.