Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JIRA Service Management vs TeamSupport comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Service Management
Ranking in Help Desk Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
IT Service Management (ITSM) (2nd)
TeamSupport
Ranking in Help Desk Software
47th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Help Desk Software category, the mindshare of JIRA Service Management is 10.9%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamSupport is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Help Desk Software
 

Featured Reviews

Shambuling-Doni - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, offers good stability and visibility for operational efficiency
The search function could be improved. We have to search a certain way. There is no generic search, it is more object-oriented search. The interface could also be more user-friendly. So, the interface and search could be improved. Additionally, I would like to see more accessibility. It would also be great if there was a Jira mobile app.
it_user1343835 - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, easy to install, and cost effective, but it needs better integration and data management
It needs better integration with other tools like Jira. Better reporting and better data management are also needed. I believe the way they're structured is the flat file. So it'd be better if they actually used a database for the data storage, and a more robust portal. I would like more flexible reporting.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The SLA, speed, the comments from agents' side, and the dashboard for agents are the most valuable features."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."
"Confluence is a great tool for documentation and tracking."
"I think one of the most valuable things is that it's all integrated."
"We can track, monitor, and get all the details we need from the end-user's point of view for any service request."
"The most valuable features of this solution are Incident and Request Management."
"The flow of the reports is good."
"The most valuable feature of Jira is that it is free of cost, which is a significant advantage."
"The two most valuable features are the portal and reporting."
 

Cons

"What needs to be added in Jira Service Management is the user screen. You'll find it very weird if this is your first time using the solution. The user-friendliness of its interface needs improvement."
"When you raise a ticket with Jira, there's no ability to see your other JIRA tickets."
"We have tried exporting some of the test cases into Jira from Excel. The interface for that isn't very user-friendly."
"The queries are weak and lack advanced functionality. You can do rudimentary queries, but you can't aggregate. You can't filter for a lot of things that would be useful, so you need to use plugins to write writing advanced queries. I run into problems when working with different organizations because they always have restrictions on what kind of plugins they allow."
"It would be better if it had capabilities to connect to mobile applications (e.g., Whatsapp)"
"In-built chat is missing in JIRA Service Management."
"JSD has some analytics, but it's pretty much basic and simple dashboards. There's no mobile application for JSD. It really would benefit from better implementation with other vendors. We're heavily reliant on some external marketplace applications."
"The search function could be improved. We have to search a certain way. There is no generic search; it is more object-oriented search."
"It needs better integration with other tools like Jira."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is free for us because we are an associate partner for the product."
"We need a license because we have a higher number than the free part."
"I would suggest to always buy licenses through an Atlassian partner, so you can also rely on their expertise."
"The cost has recently increased. It might be around $20 to $25 per user license."
"I price of JIRA Service Management is reasonable."
"It costs around $150 to $200 per user."
"On a scale of one to five, with one being really high and five being good, I would rate the price of this solution as a four."
"For the people like us, the lower the price, the better. But when compared to other competitors, I think it's Jira's price is okay."
"The price is approximately $70 per agent, per month."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JIRA Service Management?
JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?
While JIRA Service Management saves time, direct cost savings are challenging due to licensing fees. Currently, it costs around $150 to $200 per user, a significant expense, especially given the la...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

JIRA Service Desk
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada
Nokia, American Lung Association, Fujifilm, NBA, Comcast
Find out what your peers are saying about JIRA Service Management vs. TeamSupport and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.