JIRA Service Management and TOPdesk compete in the IT service management category. JIRA Service Management appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features and deployment flexibility.
Features: JIRA Service Management excels in customization, allowing users to tailor workflows and integrate with other systems effectively. It includes strong ticketing systems, SLA management, priority settings, and customizable dashboards. However, it lacks native asset management. In contrast, TOPdesk is highly regarded for its incident and change management capabilities and ease of use, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing straightforward ITSM solutions.
Room for Improvement: JIRA Service Management could improve its integration with email systems, user-friendliness, and reduce plugin dependency while enhancing asset management and reporting features. TOPdesk requires enhancements in reporting and chat integration and improvements in real-time functionalities. Its modularity can complicate large projects, and its system integration needs enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both JIRA Service Management and TOPdesk support on-premises and cloud deployments, but JIRA also offers hybrid cloud operations. JIRA's technical support is mixed, necessitating reliance on Atlassian partners for better service. TOPdesk provides localized support, although lacking 24/7 availability, giving JIRA an edge in deployment flexibility while TOPdesk faces challenges with regional constraints and limited global support.
Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management operates on a tiered pricing model, with costs rising as user numbers increase and can become expensive with add-ons. However, its subscription-based model offers high ROI due to efficiency gains. TOPdesk generally has lower pricing, making it appealing to smaller organizations. Its affordability and functionality ensure ROI by maintaining operational efficiencies, making it suitable for budget-conscious buyers.
We used Jira's free version for some time.
JIRA Service Management is Atlassian’s IT service management (ITSM) solution. It unlocks all teams at high velocity by:
1. Accelerating the flow of work between IT teams, development teams, and business teams
2. Empowering teams to deliver their service more quickly
3. Bringing visibility to their work
Built on JIRA, JIRA Service Management enables best practices across request, incident, problem, change, knowledge, asset, and configuration management so that teams can streamline collaboration between themselves. More than 30,000 customers of all sizes rely on JIRA Service Management to deliver service.
JIRA Service Management Features
JIRA Service Management has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
JIRA Service Management Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing JIRA Service Management. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
JIRA Service Management stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its stability, its easy customization, and its seamless integration with other solutions. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Abhishek S., a Program Lead at PureSoftware, writes of the solution, “You can scale the solution whether it is deployed to the cloud or the data center. While we might have up to 5,200 people using the solution, we do not require that many licenses, as only those dealing with the tickets are required to be licensed.”
Andrew B., a Technical Engineer at a consultancy firm, notes, “One of the valuable features is that an automatic response or action can be taken on tickets. We can have certain responses for tickets that contain keywords or are logged and tagged with certain labels.”
We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.